dovecot/imap [blocking on log write]

Hi, My dovecot process seam blocked on dovecot/imap [blocking on log write], only restart fix it. How solve that's? Cheers, -- alpha_one_x86/BRULE Herman Main developer of Supercopier/Ultracopier/CatchChallenger, Esourcing and server management IT, OS, technologies, research &

Re: Percent character in mail_crypt_private_password not possible

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, July 4, 2019 11:18 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > It depends. You can use either one, seehttps://wiki2.dovecot.org/Variables > > I think the safest option would be setup LDAP so that the private > password would be only readable by self, and

Re: Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive.

Hi all, The guidance provided so far has been really helpful, and has helped a great deal to bringing down wasted energy on finding and executing a viable path. I am now at the final due action to complete our Dovecot application to our use-case, but am stuck on an issue that I cannot find any

Re: Percent character in mail_crypt_private_password not possible

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, July 4, 2019 3:10 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > I am also not sure about sha512 hash because the Dovecot Variable wiki page > > does not mention sha512 but only sha256. Is sha512 also available? > > Yes Thank you Aki for confirming. I tried it out and

Re: Percent character in mail_crypt_private_password not possible

On 4.7.2019 16.05, mabi via dovecot wrote: > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Thursday, July 4, 2019 11:18 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot > wrote: > >> It depends. You can use either one, seehttps://wiki2.dovecot.org/Variables >> >> I think the safest option would be setup LDAP so that the

Re: mail_crypt: multiple keypairs

On 4.7.2019 15.35, mabi via dovecot wrote: > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Thursday, July 4, 2019 11:17 AM, @lbutlr via dovecot > wrote: > >>> Is it possible to delete the inactive keypair? if yes how? >> Wouldn’t you then be unable to *unencrypt* previous emails? > That's also what I

Re: mail_crypt: multiple keypairs

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, July 4, 2019 11:17 AM, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > > Is it possible to delete the inactive keypair? if yes how? > > Wouldn’t you then be unable to *unencrypt* previous emails? That's also what I thought but based on my understand and on the

Email encryption and key protection

I was reading through Dovecot mail-crypt plugin documentation and I'm wondering what is the benefit of turning the encryption on if private and public keys are both stored on the server? What are the benefits and how the key can be protected (apart from file permissions). Cheers, Chris

Re: solr vs fts

Am Donnerstag, den 04.07.2019, 12:27 +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > On 4.7.2019 12.22, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote: > > Hi > > So you're advised to use a solr or something else? > > > > Using any FTS is advisable, currently suitable ones would be SOLR or > Xapian (see

Re: solr vs fts

Hi, Is Clucene no longer prefered/developed indexer? Thanks. Dave. On 7/4/19, Felix Zielcke via dovecot wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 04.07.2019, 12:27 +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi via > dovecot: >> On 4.7.2019 12.22, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote: >> > Hi >> > So you're advised to use

fts_lucene

Hi everybody... I've inherited 2 servers with dovecot and fts_lucene enabled, which I plan to switch to fts-solr instead. My plan is to disable lucene in dovecot.conf, delete all cache associated files, and start configuring the fts plugin from scratch. I need to make sure that I don't mess

dsync not replicatiing .dovecot.sieve

There was a post on this topic to the list Aug 06, 2018 to which Aki replied "Thank you for reporting this, we'll take a look at this.". But its not clear what (if anything) has happened since ? The problem still seems to exist in 2.3.3 (original report by previous poster was for 2.3.2.1) The

Re: Sieve question

On 3 Jul 2019, at 01:28, Stephan Bosch via dovecot wrote: > On 03/07/2019 04:44, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: >> I have the following in my active sieve file, and there are no errors logged. >> >> >> if header :contains "to" "+root" { >>setflag "\\Seen"; >>fileinto :create "root"; >>

Re: Dovecot 2.3.0 TLS

On 3 Jul 2019, at 02:55, Peter Kahl via dovecot wrote: > I failed to disclose that the described problem occurs on iOS 13.0 beta. > > After trying again and again, it appears that a bug in iOS 13.0 beta is the > likely culprit. I am reading on Reddit that there is some bug in iOS with >

Re: Dovecot 2.3.0 TLS

On 4.7.2019 12.14, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > On 3 Jul 2019, at 02:55, Peter Kahl via dovecot wrote: >> I failed to disclose that the described problem occurs on iOS 13.0 beta. >> >> After trying again and again, it appears that a bug in iOS 13.0 beta is the >> likely culprit. I am

Re: mail_crypt: multiple keypairs

On 3 Jul 2019, at 06:38, mabi via dovecot wrote: > Is it possible to delete the inactive keypair? if yes how? Wouldn’t you then be unable to encrypt previous emails?

Re: solr vs fts

>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail >> >> I thinking about use solr like: >>  fts = solr >>  fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) >> >> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ? >> What is the difference in performance? >> > Hi! > > Dovecot indexes

Re: solr vs fts

On 4.7.2019 12.22, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote: >>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail >>> >>> I thinking about use solr like: >>>  fts = solr >>>  fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) >>> >>> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ?

solr vs fts

Hi I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via /home/us/usern...@domain.ltd/MAILDIR/ I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk (/var/dovecot_indexes%h) A few clients have 25K and more e-mail I thinking about use solr like:  fts

Re: solr vs fts

On 4.7.2019 12.14, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote: > Hi > I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x > > Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via > /home/us/usern...@domain.ltd/MAILDIR/ > I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk > (/var/dovecot_indexes%h)

Re: mail_crypt: multiple keypairs

On 4 Jul 2019, at 03:17, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > On 3 Jul 2019, at 06:38, mabi via dovecot wrote: >> Is it possible to delete the inactive keypair? if yes how? > > Wouldn’t you then be unable to encrypt previous emails? UNencrypt, of course.

Re: dsync not replicatiing .dovecot.sieve

On 4.7.2019 9.45, Laura Smith via dovecot wrote: > There was a post on this topic to the list Aug 06, 2018 to which Aki replied > "Thank you for reporting this, we'll take a look at this.". > > But its not clear what (if anything) has happened since ? The problem still > seems to exist in 2.3.3

Re: Percent character in mail_crypt_private_password not possible

On 2.7.2019 23.27, mabi wrote: > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Tuesday, July 2, 2019 6:32 PM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot > wrote: > >> I don't actually recommend using password directly from user as password for >> private keys, I recommend running them thru some hash / pkcs5 before that.