Re: Multiple backends with NFSv4.1 (supports file locking): should work without Director, right?

On 22/05/2023 22:33, Marc wrote: used director. real (hardware) load balancers are actually smart and exponentially more reliable and robust than server based :) because there runs no software on it, right this statement here, shows what a clueless newbie you are -- Regards, Noel

Re: Multiple backends with NFSv4.1 (supports file locking): should work without Director, right?

On 22/05/2023 22:36, Marc wrote: On EMC Unity there is a NAS server parameter that can be changed to Maybe a bit to much of topic, but why EMC and not something like ceph? You rarely see any interesting comparisons on line (except of course the stupid ones listing features) there is a

Re: Multiple backends with NFSv4.1 (supports file locking): should work without Director, right?

On EMC Unity there is a NAS server parameter that can be changed to disable NFSv4 delegations using the following command, svc_nas -param -facility nfsv4 -modify delegationsEnabled -value 0 On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 7:34 AM Noel Butler wrote: > > NFSv4, a dozen front ends to an EMC backend,

Re: bug report: fd-util.c: line 102 (fd_set_nonblock): assertion failed: (fd > -1)

Hi Aki, > Do you have `noreplicate` used anywhere? It seems this could > potentially cause the crash. Yes, noreplicate was set. But removing it (*) doesn't change anything. The stack trace is identical. *) - removed default_fields = noreplicate:protected=true in conf.d/auth-system.conf.ext -

RE: Multiple backends with NFSv4.1 (supports file locking): should work without Director, right?

> used director. real (hardware) load balancers are actually smart and > exponentially more reliable and robust than server based :) > because there runs no software on it, right ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send

RE: Multiple backends with NFSv4.1 (supports file locking): should work without Director, right?

> > On EMC Unity there is a NAS server parameter that can be changed to Maybe a bit to much of topic, but why EMC and not something like ceph? You rarely see any interesting comparisons on line (except of course the stupid ones listing features)

Re: LDAP olcAccess for auth_bind

Hi, I reviewed your guidelines and focused only on how olcAccess works to block anonymous users. I installed a blank native Debian and interestingly, the default Debian rules also allow anonymous reading of the LDAP directory. olcAccess by Debian olcAccess: {0} to attrs=userPassword by self

Re: Multiple backends with NFSv4.1 (supports file locking): should work without Director, right?

Nice to know, similar option doesn't exist on VNX's though On 22/05/2023 17:30, Adrian M wrote: On EMC Unity there is a NAS server parameter that can be changed to disable NFSv4 delegations using the following command, svc_nas -param -facility nfsv4 -modify delegationsEnabled -value 0 On

Outlook fails to connect to Dovecot submission server

Have you tried adding the line below to your submision config? submission_client_workarounds = whitespace-before-path___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

Re: Outlook fails to connect to Dovecot submission server

Hi Nikolaos, Am 22.05.23 um 15:25 schrieb Nikolaos Pyrgiotis: Have you tried adding the line below to your submision config? submission_client_workarounds = whitespace-before-path I tried, also with all other workarounds, unfortunately that (alone) does not help :( Ralf -- Ralf Becker