On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 00:34 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Squat-like 4 byte substrings (but can answer 1-3 char queries also):
Indexing a 1,4GB Linux kernel mailing list mbox with 367919 messages:
UID count: 367919
Index time: 129.86 CPU seconds (10.43MB/CPUs), 132.47 seconds
(10.23MB/s)
Memory:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :)
Timo Sirainen wrote:
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :)
Congratulations. You and all contributors have made a great job.
Congratulations Timo,
great software. 1.0.0 up and running.
Aiko
--
Aiko Barz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.haeckser.de
pgpAxgqfrw1nF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:04:23PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready.
Good job, Timo! Congratulations with the very solid 1.0 release.
It's in
Woohoo, this is like Finland winning the Euro Song Contest, we thought
it would never happen!
Congrats.
Lund
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not
Oh no!!! We never run version 1.0 of any software! Now I'm stuck
at rc32 forever! Arrrgh
Just kidding. :) Great job, great software.
Jeff Earickson
Colby College
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:04:23 +0300
From: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 11:28 +0200, Samuel HAMEAU wrote:
I didn't really understand where you're forwarding the mail to. Is
Dovecot also running there?
I was forwarding a mail comming from a user of the same domain (we
are
running dovecot/maildir), to
Congratulations, thanks for great job! :)
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug just
hi...
¿dovecot uses imap4?
can anybody explain diferences between imap4 and imap.
--
Salu2 ;)
On Fri, April 13, 2007 14:04, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
Hi,
a new version of the sql split patch attached, should be smaller, cleaner,
better.
--
Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.
--- dovecot-1.0.rc32/src/dict/main.c.split 2007-02-22 15:32:11.0
+0100
+++ dovecot-1.0.rc32/src/dict/main.c2007-04-13 13:56:55.0 +0200
aza zel wrote:
hi...
¿dovecot uses imap4?
can anybody explain diferences between imap4 and imap.
Are you serious?
Google is your friend...
IMAP4rev1 is simply the current version of the IMAP specification.
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International
i change the question because dovecot support imap4: ¿how can i enable imap4
in dovecot?
Salu2
2007/4/13, aza zel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi...
¿dovecot uses imap4?
can anybody explain diferences between imap4 and imap.
--
Salu2 ;)
--
Salu2 ;)
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug just waiting for v1.0 to be
Are you serious?
sorry
IMAP4rev1 is simply the current version of the IMAP specification.
ok, ignore my previus post
Salu2 ;)
On 4/13/2007 aza zel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
i change the question because dovecot support imap4: ¿how can i
enable imap4 in dovecot?
Read the docs?
IMAP = IMAP4 = IMAP4rev1 in dovecot (and most other IMAP servers).
I'm sorry - but such a basic question just isn't reasonable. If you are
Where do we send the case of champagne?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:07:58 +0300
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gzip compression makes the uidlist still 25% smaller (total space
19,50%). It'd have to be used to compress the file in smaller blocks
because zlib doesn't support quickly seeking inside the file. That would
probably
Re-reading these posts...
Maybe there was a language issue?
I'm sorry if I came off mean...
I had a long night, and should know better than to participate in mail
list discussions when I'm grumpy...
My apologies...
aza zel wrote:
sorry :(
2007/4/13, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On
On 4/13/07, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:04:23PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
Congratulations on the big one-oh! (oh)
And thanks,
mm
Hello all,
Definitely congrats on the 1.0.0 release!
Anyway, I'm having a problem, that may or may not be related to
Dovecot. Specifically, duplicate (and sometimes triplicate) emails are
appearing. These emails have exactly the same queue ID, so its not that
they were sent multiple times.
When this happens with sendmail, it can be that the queue handler
doesn't finish before a new queue handler is kicked off, so each
successive queue handler/runner ends up sending the same mail.
Background: sendmail, and perhaps postfix, is configured to a) toss
stuff it can't handle right away
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:04:23 +0300
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's
Hmm. Thats interesting. The thing is, its only happening for one user
that I'm aware of. Also, I probably should of mentioned that I'm using
Maildir ... I'm sure that changes things :)
-Phillip
Stewart Dean wrote:
When this happens with sendmail, it can be that the queue handler
doesn't
It happened, it really happened!
Many thanks Timo and contribs for all the great work!
Dovecot is an excellent piece of software, congrats!!!
Lets celebrate ...
Oliver
Timo Sirainen wrote:
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon,
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 10:26 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
Is it time to update the Wikipedia entry for Timo Sirainen? :)
I don't know. People shouldn't update their own entries there ;)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
* Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-13 14:05]:
[...]
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :)
Hooray! :-D
Thanks Timo, I owe you a beer (of
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 09:10 -0500, Phillip T. George wrote:
Anyway, I'm having a problem, that may or may not be related to
Dovecot. Specifically, duplicate (and sometimes triplicate) emails are
appearing. These emails have exactly the same queue ID, so its not that
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 11:58 -0400, Stewart Dean wrote:
A lot of this has to do with design philosophy, best practices that
those with broader vision, experience and wisdom can communicate to
those on the ground. Yes, RTFM and Use the Source, Luke, but there a
lot more to skillful means
It will be interesting to see if there were people who were holding out
for version 1.0 to start using it. I'm wondering if there will be a
surge of new users.
Congrats Timo. I'm sure there will be a 1.01. Software is never finished.
Congratulations !
Now let's get 1.0.1 quckly ;)
On April 13, 2007 3:04:23 PM +0300 Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon,
famous last words!
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug just waiting for v1.0 to
Timo Sirainen wrote:
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :)
Congratulations Timo!
Well done and thanks for this fantastic piece of software ...
On Thursday 12 April 2007 21:18, Marc Perkel wrote:
Remember even if you don't get everything right by tomorrow there's
always version 1.01. There will always be bugs and new features to add.
1.01 is a bad version designation. Version strings are no floating-point
numbers!
--
Magnus Holmgren
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:04:23PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :)
Happy zeroth birthday :)
--
Axel.Thimm at
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug just waiting for v1.0 to be
On 4/14/07, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
bug just waiting for v1.0 to be
quote who=Daniel L. Miller
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
Congratulations Mr. Sirainen. Tell the Fedora folks to make an RPM
update for FC6.
Stewart Dean schrieb:
When this happens with sendmail, it can be that the queue handler
doesn't finish before a new queue handler is kicked off, so each
successive queue handler/runner ends up sending the same mail.
Background: sendmail, and perhaps postfix, is configured to a) toss
stuff it
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 01:47:57PM -0700, Tim Alberts wrote:
Congratulations Mr. Sirainen. Tell the Fedora folks to make an RPM
update for FC6.
The Fedora folks are listening and will issue an update soon. They put it into
rawhide in today's morning and I suppose they could put it into
Phillip T. George schrieb:
Here's a snippet from the procmail log file:
procmail: Assigning
LASTFOLDER=/home/domain.com/homes/user/Maildir/new/1176426436.9170_1.east.domain.com
procmail: Notified comsat:
[EMAIL
On Apr 13, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
Tomas Janousek wrote:
The Fedora folks are listening and will issue an update soon. They put it into
rawhide in today's morning and I suppose they could put it into FC6 within a
few days. ;)
Hi Tomas, if you want to feed this back upstream based on the work I've
done with Axel:
Tomas Janousek:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 01:47:57PM -0700, Tim Alberts wrote:
Congratulations Mr. Sirainen. Tell the Fedora folks to make an RPM
update for FC6.
The Fedora folks are listening and will issue an update soon. They put it into
rawhide in today's morning and I suppose
Hi Georgie
Just testing!
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it.
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
Timo - you are a champion
The many word of appreciation here are well deserved, and I was just
thinking that the number of people who must unknowingly use Dovecot
everyday would have to be in the millions!! Those people who don't even
know what Dovecot is - I'm sure they are the most
Hi all
It's morning and I haven't had coffee but has anyone else noticed that
the Wiki seems to have changed languages from English to Russian in
sections?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/FrontPage
It appears a user has made some edits to a couple of the pages and
'translated' them.
Regards
52 matches
Mail list logo
