On April 16, 2007 3:20:10 PM +0300 Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 23:40 -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
I've configured the lazy_expunge plugin exactly like it says on the wiki.
I can't seem to configure Mulberry to find the new namespaces. Any
hints?
I notice that
On 17.4.2007, at 9.06, Frank Cusack wrote:
Your problem anyway is that hidden=yes makes the namespaces
invisible to
clients. I'll go remove them.
Sure, I realize that. But in the Display Hierarchy dialog,
Mulberry has
a part to enter additional hierarchies (I guess this is
namespaces),
On 17.4.2007, at 7.01, 黃家俊 wrote:
By the way, can I specify a timeout value for it?
#define LOG_DOTLOCK_TIMEOUT 60 in src/lib-index/mail-transaction-
log.c. So not without modifying the sources. But lowering that will
simply make it fail earlier.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a
On 17.4.2007, at 0.11, Phillip T. George wrote:
Oh..hmm. I may have left an important part of the log file
out...it was previously grepped, but here it is, with the delete
line in the middle:
Apr 16 12:51:45 east dovecot: IMAP(user.domain.com), IP
(70.177.64.93): copy - Spam: uid=718,
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 02:14 -0700, Joakim Ryden wrote:
I've been trying to research how to (or if possible at all) implement public
folders using the namespace feature on a server with multiple virtual domains.
After about an hour of looking around I'm a little confused. :)
Did you read this?
On Tue, April 17, 2007 2:29 am, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 02:14 -0700, Joakim Ryden wrote:
I've been trying to research how to (or if possible at all) implement public
folders using the namespace feature on a server with multiple virtual
domains.
After about an hour of
On Tue, April 17, 2007 3:48 am, Joakim Ryden wrote:
On Tue, April 17, 2007 2:29 am, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 02:14 -0700, Joakim Ryden wrote:
I've been trying to research how to (or if possible at all) implement public
folders using the namespace feature on a server with
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 03:48 -0700, Joakim Ryden wrote:
With this, Public Folders shows up (testing with Thunderbird) but
not as an
italic special folder (does that make sense?) as it does on all other
accounts I
have on other servers which support public folders.
I think I heard that
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Justin McAleer wrote:
I have the source mail spools on NFS as well.
Just asking - not looking for a flame war. I had a miserable time
trying to get NFS working with just my simple LAN - I've had much
better results via Samba with either SMBFS or CIFS. Off-topic - but
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 03:48 -0700, Joakim Ryden wrote:
With this, Public Folders shows up (testing with Thunderbird) but
not as an
italic special folder (does that make sense?) as it does on all other
accounts I
have on other servers which support public folders.
I
Chaos Engine wrote:
Of course my onboard clock is constantly off by more than 5 secs.
I don't want
to abandon time synchronization and I want to use dovecot. Maybe a
-HUP signal would do? What do you propose?
Not too long ago there was a similar question. You can simply recompile
dovecot
I previously asked about this problem with pam on IBM's AIX Unix
I get the errmsg:
auth|security:err|error dovecot-auth PAM: load_modules: can not open
module /usr/lib/security/pam_prohibit
FWIW, it turned out that the default PAM libraries are 32 bit, while I
had compiled DC at 64bit.
The
Justin McAleer wrote:
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Justin McAleer wrote:
I have the source mail spools on NFS as well.
Just asking - not looking for a flame war. I had a miserable time
trying to get NFS working with just my simple LAN - I've had much
better results via Samba with either SMBFS or
On 09/04/2007 03:24, Sean Kamath wrote:
On Apr 8, 2007, at 2:20 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
It is important for people to understand how much simpler it is now to
run basically functional and non-abusive NTP than it was even 5 years
ago. The work put into making pool.ntp.org usable has essentially
I think I won't do any actual releases until it's mostly feature
complete. Then maybe v1.1.alpha1 or v1.1.beta1. So if you want to test
it before then, use CVS or the nightly snapshots.
I'm planning on keeping v1.1 almost completely compatible with v1.0.
There could be some minor configuration
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Features that I'm planning on implementing:
- Fully supported shared mailboxes and IMAP ACL extension
- Replace Squat FTS indexes with my new design
- Case-insensitive searches with non-ASCII text as well
- Maybe add support for all kinds of IMAP extensions that can be
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 15:41 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
In my testing of using sql dictionary for quota, it appears pretty
buggy. Are you aware of such problems? Either way, would you consider
reliable dictionary quota support a target for 1.1?
Actually I think I did it today. The
In the 1.1 plans
(http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-April/021974.html) I don't see
any mention of sieve... is this intentional? Sieve support is a
priority for me... I'm going to have to see if I can get it via exim's
support if dovecot's not going to add it in 1.1.
Cheers,
David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
I think I won't do any actual releases until it's mostly feature
complete. Then maybe v1.1.alpha1 or v1.1.beta1. So if you want to test
it before then, use CVS or the nightly snapshots.
I'm planning on keeping v1.1 almost
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:30:38 +0100
David Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the 1.1 plans
(http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-April/021974.html) I don't see
any mention of sieve... is this intentional? Sieve support is a
priority for me... I'm going to have to see if I can get it via
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 23:32 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
will you include some quota warn code to lda like maildrop does ?
There's already a patch for that in v1.0. So yes, I'll most likely
include that to v1.1 once it gets ported.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On April 17, 2007 11:21:14 AM +0300 Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17.4.2007, at 9.06, Frank Cusack wrote:
Your problem anyway is that hidden=yes makes the namespaces
invisible to
clients. I'll go remove them.
Sure, I realize that. But in the Display Hierarchy dialog,
Mulberry
I'd like dovecot to have option '-e' to edit configs like postfix has.
I understand dovecot configs are much more complex and have nested blocks.
But may be double-colon notation to qualify identifiers by block names
will work, like:
---
dovecot -e 'socket
On Tuesday 17 Apr 2007, Brad wrote:
Dovecot has had Sieve support for quite some time. It is mentioned on
the download page.
Download Sieve plugin v1.0.1 for Dovecot's local delivery agent.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve
Sorry... I know about and am using the sieve plugin... I should
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 22:59 +0100, David Anderson wrote:
Sorry... I know about and am using the sieve plugin... I should have
said MANAGESIEVE. I realise there's a patch for that, but I was
wondering if something's going to make it into 1.1.
I don't think so. I want to distribute it with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 23:32 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
will you include some quota warn code to lda like maildrop does ?
There's already a patch for that in v1.0. So yes, I'll most likely
include that to v1.1 once it
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 21:46 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I'm planning on keeping v1.1 almost completely compatible with v1.0.
There could be some minor configuration file changes, but for most
people v1.0's dovecot.conf should work with v1.1.
Please, this needs to be Everyone's v1.0
I want to update index file handling to use less locks and
update dovecot.index file less often. The file formats would
still stay backwards compatible with v1.0. After this I'm
hoping to get index files working well with NFS even with
attribute cache enabled.
Music to my ears - as im
Hey,
This may be a dumb question... I'm trying to set up 1.0 with a static
userdb, and I'm getting stuck. I have:
userdb static {
args = uid=500 gid=500 home=/domains/%d/%n
}
When I attempt to log in as, say, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (via telnet, so
I *know* I'm logging in as that
On Tuesday, April 17 at 05:58 PM, quoth Sergey:
I'd like dovecot to have option '-e' to edit configs like postfix has.
I understand dovecot configs are much more complex and have nested blocks.
But may be double-colon notation to qualify identifiers by block names
will work, like:
---
dovecot -e
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 22:59 +0100, David Anderson wrote:
MANAGESIEVE
I don't think so.
In the meantime you can use pysieved. The 1.0 release should be out any day
now.
http://woozle.org/~neale/src/pysieved
Neale
31 matches
Mail list logo
