On 11/05/2007 15:57, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 14:00 +0100, John Robinson wrote:
I'm trying to add "virtual" mailboxes to a system. Real users with
different uids own domains. Each domain has a passwd-file passdb. I
don't want to use this passwd-file for the userdb, because I w
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:45:31AM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, M1 wrote:
>
> I glanced over the current Sieve library (CMU):
>
> >1) 3 global scripts, 1 execute before user script, 1 execute after user
> >script, 1 execute only if there is no user script.
>
> I didn't
I'm trying to use Dovecot to make administering ASSP a bit easier. I've
created a mailbox with a number of subfolders (Spam, Ham, etc.) and have
ASSP setup to save mail in the appropriate folder e.g.
/var/mail/ASSP/.INBOX.Ham/new. But I'm having problems with ASSP
complaining about the newly
Stewart Dean wrote:
a) a VIP has multiple secretaries accessing a single mailbox (actually,
they are professional enough to have figured the realities of
conflicting access and rarely have a problem),
b) somebody leaving their machine on at home and coming in and firing up
their work computer
c
Duh. I thought I'd tried that and just found that it killed the
process...indeed it does the job of refreshing. Sorry.
Charles Marcus wrote:
If I've made configuration changes, is there a way to
refresh...without killing and restartingDovecot?
> kill -HUP
>
> =or=
>
> killall -HUP dove
My production imap is currently UWIMAP with mbox.. One of the problems
commonly observed is mailbox lock loss, which happens when:
a) a VIP has multiple secretaries accessing a single mailbox (actually,
they are professional enough to have figured the realities of
conflicting access and rarely h
If I've made configuration changes, is there a way to
refresh...without killing and restartingDovecot?
> kill -HUP
>
> =or=
>
> killall -HUP dovecot
Postfix has a reload option... May I suggest the same for dovecot?
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers Internation
kill -HUP
=or=
killall -HUP dovecot
On May 14, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Stewart Dean wrote:
If I've made configuration changes, is there a way to
refresh...without killing and restartingDovecot?
--
Stewart Dean, Unix System Admin, Henderson Computer Resources
Center of Bard College,
If I've made configuration changes, is there a way to refresh...without
killing and restartingDovecot?
--
Stewart Dean, Unix System Admin, Henderson Computer Resources
Center of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York 12504
[EMAIL PROTECTED] voice: 845-758-7475, fax: 845-758-70
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 14:03 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > I thought I'd try benchmarking with dbmail (v2.2.4) to see how much
> > slower a SQL backend could actually be. Skip to bottom for the
> > conclusions.
> >
> > Originally I ran the tests with the databases being i
Quoting Andy Shellam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Eric,
SSH tunnelling requires an SSH login though, right?
No. SSH tunneling connects to a service, and that service can require
authentication if it so desires. SSH tunneling is just port forwarding
via SSH. It can be used to tunnel (and hence e
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I thought I'd try benchmarking with dbmail (v2.2.4) to see how much
slower a SQL backend could actually be. Skip to bottom for the
conclusions.
Originally I ran the tests with the databases being in XFS filesystem.
MySQL's performance was horrible. It went 3-7x faster wit
Hi Eric,
SSH tunnelling requires an SSH login though, right? Even if that's via
PAM or other authentication method, it's another set of authentication
to set up, why not keep it all in the same system (i.e. Dovecot?) I
wouldn't allow SSH access connections to a public-facing server, mainly
Could someone please update the dbmail wikipedia page with this info ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBMail_IMAP_and_POP3_server
I suppose what would be nicer would be to extend the dovecot entry and
reference that from the dbmail entry ;)
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 03:16:05AM +0300, Timo Sirainen
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:41:53PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> - Get the rewritten Squat full text search index working. It probably
> needs a name change, since it's not all that close to Cyrus Squat
> anymore. Suggestions? Could of course be just "fts_dovecot".
"squatimo" ? (or squatmo)
Mr.
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I disagree about SSH.
Good for you.
Firstly, how do virtual users fit into your proposed setup?
You can setup a ssh tunnel on the server on any port. The user then
sets up to connect to that port. The authentication can be done anyway
you want, or not at all.
dovecot version 1.0.0, compile from the sources.
- snip
# /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
listen: *:10143
ssl_listen: *:10943
ssl_cert_file: /etc/ssl/certs/postamt.pem
ssl_key_file: /etc/ssl/private/postamt.key
disable_plaintext_auth: no
login_dir: /usr/local/var/run/dovecot/login
log
I disagree about SSH.
Firstly, how do virtual users fit into your proposed setup?
Secondly, as a service provider to the general public, the absolute LAST thing
I want to be doing is opening up SSH access to my servers.
Mark has a valid point in that you have to connect to the server via IMAP to
dovecot 1.0.0; Free BSD 6.2; x86; UFS; no NFS
IMAP not uses at all, POP3 only
Problem description:
POP3 client can't fetch second e-mail message from Maildir if first POP3
connect occurs before any message placed in Maildir.
Details:
1. POP3-client first time tries to receive mail:
May 14 16:
Vulpes Velox wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2007 06:55:59 -0700
Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's some thoughts I'd like to throw out there. I know it's not
standard IMAP protocol but someone has to try new ideas first and I
want to see what people (Timo) think of this.
IMAP establish
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 06:55 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Here's some thoughts I'd like to throw out there. I know it's not
> standard IMAP protocol but someone has to try new ideas first and I want
> to see what people (Timo) think of this.
>
> IMAP establishes a connection between the client an
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:07:12PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 14:11 +0200, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
> > location =
> > mbox:/var/mail/shared:CONTROL=/var/mail/shared/.control:INDEX=/var/mail/shared/.index
>
> mbox has no CONTROL directory.
I've got this line from an Exam
Hello Timo,
On 2007-05-11, 16:18, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 12:49 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote:
> > | Apr 24 11:42:08 smtp2 postfix/qmgr[6176]: 05BAE3B67E: from=<>, size=3055,
> > nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> > | Apr 24 11:42:08 smtp2 postfix/qmgr[6176]: 05BAE3B67E:
> > to=, relay=n
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 22:30 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I just figured out that O_APPEND is pretty great. If the operating
> system updates seek position after writing to a file opened with
> O_APPEND, writes to Dovecot's transaction log file can be made
> lockless.
Well, almost. Log rotat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Since I can't think of any other modes,
I'm going to look into adding LMTP to deliver ;-)
sendmail supports LMTP even for a spawned LDA rather than a LMTP deamon.
However, I don't know what to prefer.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
+ putenv("DEBUG"); /* BTW this is a short living fork
+ of deliver */
putenv() without '=' in the string isn't a standard, so I didn't want to
use that when I wrote
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 22:16 +0200, Rainer Sigl wrote:
no, I don't use NFS but it may be a permission problem.
I have virtual users so all the directories belong a artificial user
'exim' and also group 'exim'. Additionally I saw now that the file
dovecot-uidlist has the
27 matches
Mail list logo
