-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Joshua, C.S. Chen wrote:
Now today the server loading is highly reduced because of the pop3
session impact is low. But users have the following problems:
They leave the messages on the server :(
For outlook express users,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, M1 wrote:
When a user enable vacation in sieve deliver die and the mail lost.
The script is fine and is working for me, but I'm using v1.0.1 currently.
I had some problems with core dumps some time ago, because Dovecot
On Aug 12, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Michael Guntsche wrote:
Running Dovecot 1.0.3 on OS X 10.4.10 here. Which --with-notify
compile time option would you suggest? dnotify, inotify, kqueue,
or none.
You should use kqueue under macosx since dnotify and inotify are
linux only.
Thanks for that,
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 17:20 +0200, Michael Guntsche wrote:
So my question is can I check that dovecot is actually using inotify?
You can strace it or put a few print statements into the code.
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Timo,
Is the dovecot index cache stored only standard header
fields (from, to, cc, subject, content-type... )? What
happen if there is non standard header, will it be cached?
- Joe
May the force be with you..
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 17:20 +0200, Michael Guntsche wrote:
Hi,
I recently switched from courier imap to dovecot. With courier I had
a working IDLE setup that informed me immediately when new mail
arrived. With Dovecot it is different, sometimes i get an immediate
result but most of
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 19:24 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
Hi Timo,
Is the dovecot index cache stored only standard header
fields (from, to, cc, subject, content-type... )? What
happen if there is non standard header, will it be cached?
Yes. Dovecot caches the headers that a client fetches. No more
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha3.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha3.tar.gz.sig
All kinds of fixes and API changes. Previous alphas had some problems
with index handling, now I didn't get any errors after almost 24h of
stress testing.
As a new
On Aug 13, 2007, at 13:49, Timo Sirainen wrote:
What IMAP client do you use? Currently Dovecot works like:
- IDLE starts
- if maildir changes, the new changes are reported immediately
- if client doesn't break from IDLE, continue..
- if maildir changes before maildir_idle_check_interval
Nicolas Boullis, on 8/11/2007 5:49 PM, said the following:
Hi,
Long ago (more than 2 month ago), I told about a pipe plugin I had
written to perform some spam/ham learning (see the attached message).
I'm now proud to say that I can make it available for use by anyone.
You can get it from
Hi,
Charles Marcus wrote:
This looks interesting - how does it differ from the DSPAM plug-in?
Maybe a generic plug-in could be created that would allow it to be used
with any anti-spa, solution (I prefer ASSP myself)...
This plugin has nothing spamassassin-specific. Although I don't know
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:10:53 +0300 Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha3.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha3.tar.gz.sig
Replaced 1.0.3 by 1.1.alpha3 but got many error messages
Aug 13 14:59:09 seymour dovecot: Dovecot
After upgrading my server I have found that Im not able to use plain auth
for clients conecting from outside server. localhost clients (pine,
webmail) works fine, but if I use Thunderbird I got an error saying that
server requires TLS or SSL. But if I enable TLS or SSL I got more errors.
I have
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 15:14 +0200, Frank Elsner wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:10:53 +0300 Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha3.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha3.tar.gz.sig
Replaced 1.0.3 by 1.1.alpha3 but got many error
Hi Timo,
I see. So, if the client fetch the From field at the first time and then
fetch the subject field at the second time, the index.cache file will be
updated twice?
- Joe
- Original Message -
From: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joe Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Hi Timo,
Not necessarily. It goes like this:
1. mailbox is newly created
2. a new mail arrives
3. Client does FETCH 1 (BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (From)])
-- Dovecot caches From header
4. Client does FETCH 1 (BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (Subject)])
-- Dovecot caches Subject header
5. a new mail
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 06:06:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So Dovecot remembers what fields client is interested of and when header
is being parsed it caches everything that it knows the client wants.
For how long does dovecot remember which headers? e.g. what happens if a
user switches to
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 23:18 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
Hi Timo,
Not necessarily. It goes like this:
1. mailbox is newly created
2. a new mail arrives
3. Client does FETCH 1 (BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (From)])
-- Dovecot caches From header
4. Client does FETCH 1 (BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 22:22 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
Hi Timo,
I see. So, if the client fetch the From field at the first time and then
fetch the subject field at the second time, the index.cache file will be
updated twice?
Not necessarily. It goes like this:
1. mailbox is newly created
2.
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 17:23 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 06:06:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So Dovecot remembers what fields client is interested of and when header
is being parsed it caches everything that it knows the client wants.
For how long does dovecot
I attach a patch that adds some informational logging for the vacation
outcome in a similar style as the 'notify', 'redirect' and 'reject' cases.
I considered adding logging for the not-willing-to-respond case since I
think that would greatly assist testing/debugging vacation responses, but
Hello Timo,
On Aug 13, 2007, at 14:15, Michael Guntsche wrote:
Maybe this can be changed that it does not take the interval into
account of it uses inotify, dnotify or kqueue.
My workaround for now is to set the timeout to 1.
I thought about a simple way to implement this.
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 23:24 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.08.13.2259 +0200]:
Memory use seems to be O(n) in the size of the folder. On the folder
with 70k messages, dovecot seems to allocate 280m of memory, which
I just saw in the logs:
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 22:59 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
The way offlineimap reads may is by FETCHing metadata, then
APPENDing new local mail, SEARCHing for the UIDs of each uploaded
mail, and finally FETCHing new remote mail.
What exactly do you mean by FETCHing metadata? Something like
Trying to do a little (cosmetic) tweak to my configuration and just don't
seem to be able to come up with a set of options that works.
My POP/IMAP configuration is working just fine in terms of mail retrieval,
etc. What I'm seeing in the logs now is...
Aug 13 18:15:17 test2 dovecot:
25 matches
Mail list logo
