On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:21 +, Adrian Barker wrote:
We recently moved all our users from the Washington IMAP server to
Dovecot. There has been a substantial improvement in performance, but
some users are reporting duplicate messages, and we see 'Stale NFS file
handle' errors in the
Hi
My 2p
dbox plans, could be implemented for v1.2:
Interesting to see this as production ready product. Could be very
interesting if it adds performance and new features.
v2.0 master/config rewrite
--
It's mostly working already. One of the larger problems
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 21:08 +0100, Jost Krieger wrote:
We have dropped dovecot in place of UW-IMAP for about 4 users
and have solved our immediate problem: disk I/O overload, mainly
from people doing POP3 and leave mail on server. Thank you!
Now i got loads of dovecot error messages in
We have dropped dovecot in place of UW-IMAP for about 4 users
and have solved our immediate problem: disk I/O overload, mainly
from people doing POP3 and leave mail on server. Thank you!
Now i got loads of dovecot error messages in the logs and don't know
if there is any significance. Here
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 23:05 -0600, Darren McLaughlin wrote:
There's a ringing endorsement of Verio. They told me that the server
had agroup mail file and all the users had their mail stored
together. If I installed Dovecot, they said it would split the
mailboxes up into individual files, and
Hi Timo,
Dovecot was running on FC7 while the file server is running
on FC4.
- Joe
May the force be with you..
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:56 +, Ed W wrote:
dbox plans, could be implemented for v1.2:
Interesting to see this as production ready product. Could be very
interesting if it adds performance and new features.
It should be production ready in v1.1 already. Or at least I don't see
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 11:29 +, Adrian Barker wrote:
Nov 29 00:49:47 imap-e.ucl.ac.uk dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error]
IMAP(ccaazzz): close() failed with index
file /home/ccaazzz/imap-mail/.imap/mbox/dovecot.index: Stale NFS file
handle
..
Thanks for replying. I have read the wiki page
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 14:02 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
You mention some problems like unique ID's. This is actually pretty
simple - just use some GUID type process. All you need is something
guaranteed unique on each server, combinations of time, something unique
per server and some
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 14:56 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Currently deliver only logs the message id. A user would never
ask for this (especially if he asks where certain mails were
stored/discarded), he would ask for the sender's name/email or
subject. Is the contents of the log file
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:11 -0500, Sacha Bernstein wrote:
I would like to develop a new mailbox format for a very specialized
application. Can anyone point me in the appropriate direction to get
started writing a plugin?
More detail for anyone interested:
I need to store mail in a format
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:17:22PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Deliver / LMTP server
-
Currently deliver parses dovecot.conf using its own parser. This has
caused all kinds of problems. v2.0's master rewrite helps with this,
because deliver can then just ask the
I would like to develop a new mailbox format for a very specialized
application. Can anyone point me in the appropriate direction to get
started writing a plugin?
More detail for anyone interested:
I need to store mail in a format that's quickly accessible and
modifiable to an external process.
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:20:12AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 21:08 +0100, Jost Krieger wrote:
The most common event is:
2007-12-06 16:00:17.837654500 dovecot: Error: IMAP(): FETCH for
mailbox UCE-TMP UID 1547 got too little data: 5176 vs 5184
2007-12-06
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 22:20 +0100, Jost Krieger wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:20:12AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 21:08 +0100, Jost Krieger wrote:
The most common event is:
2007-12-06 16:00:17.837654500 dovecot: Error: IMAP(): FETCH for
mailbox
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Peter Hessler wrote:
There are a couple of jerks that are tying to dictionary attack my
email server, and one of the vectors is pop3/imap logins. Something I
would like to do in dovecot, but can't seem to find, is the ability to
disconnect after a certain number of errors.
On 9.12.2007, at 0.16, Peter Hessler wrote:
There are a couple of jerks that are tying to dictionary attack my
email server, and one of the vectors is pop3/imap logins. Something I
would like to do in dovecot, but can't seem to find, is the ability to
disconnect after a certain number of
On 2007 Dec 09 (Sun) at 00:20:11 +0200 (+0200), Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.12.2007, at 0.16, Peter Hessler wrote:
There are a couple of jerks that are tying to dictionary attack my
email server, and one of the vectors is pop3/imap logins. Something I
would like to do in dovecot, but can't
On 9.12.2007, at 0.23, Peter Hessler wrote:
On 2007 Dec 09 (Sun) at 00:20:11 +0200 (+0200), Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.12.2007, at 0.16, Peter Hessler wrote:
There are a couple of jerks that are tying to dictionary attack my
email server, and one of the vectors is pop3/imap logins.
At 11:05 PM -0600 12/7/07, Darren McLaughlin wrote:
Bill,
There's a ringing endorsement of Verio.
And maybe not quite fair, since your first paraphrasing came across
as further from reality than the second...
They told me that the
server had agroup mail file and all the users had their
Hmm. Maybe a feature packed v1.2 would be a good idea after all. It
wouldn't have any huge underlying changes, so most likely it could be
released only a few months after v1.1.
Implemented, but slightly buggy so not included in v1.1 (yet):
- Mailbox list indexes
- THREAD REFERENCES
Bill,
Thanks for your detailed explanation. I apologize for using incorrect
terminology, but I am operating a little out of my depth as I have only 2
servers with Verio. I started with them years ago, as websites are a small
part of my consulting, and as email has evolved so have the server
22 matches
Mail list logo
