To some users happens this assertion failure while deleting a message.
dovecot: Mar 10 08:40:44 Panic: IMAP(user): file index-sync.c: line 39
(index_mailbox_set_recent_uid): assertion failed: (seq_range_exists
(ibox-recent_flags, uid))
dovecot: Mar 10 08:40:44 Error: IMAP(user): Raw backtrace:
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 10:05 +0100, Jeremie Bouttier wrote:
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
How about just setting /var/mail 01777?
I believe this allows any user to create /var/mail/anotheruser if it
does not exist yet. We have several hundred accounts and new ones
regularly created, so this is
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
How about just setting /var/mail 01777?
I believe this allows any user to create /var/mail/anotheruser if it
does not exist yet. We have several hundred accounts and new ones
regularly created, so this is a risk (that could perhaps be mitigated by
creating the inbox
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:44:21 -0800,
Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried to set this up (multiple certs for multiple
hostnames) with something like stunnel wrapper for SSL instead of
using dovecot's SSL?
Yes. Try something like this:
stunnel -p /path/to/cert.pem -d thisimapdIP:993
Hi,
Im testing with 1.1RC1. I read here:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/Maildir
If you configure quota limits in Dovecot (e.g.
quota=maildir:storage=102400(kilobytes)), Dovecot makes sure that this
header is kept up to date. If the file does not exist, it's simply
rebuilt.
This is my query:
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 13:39 +0100, Jan van den Berg wrote:
concat('maildir:storage=', quota, 'M:ignore=Spam\ e\-mail') AS
userdb_quotarule,
'Trash:storage=20M' as userdb_quota_rule2
Almost, but userdb_quota_rule, not userdb_quotarule.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Right...
I made a typo:
userdb_quotarule instead of userdb_quota_rule (weird that Dovecot
doesn't complain about this).
But now I get this error:
Mar 10 13:52:29 mx01 dovecot: IMAP(roka-05): Quota rule: root=
mailbox=maildir bytes=10485760 messages=0
Mar 10 13:52:29 mx01 dovecot: IMAP(roka-05):
Of course the rule is wrong:
:ignore=Spam\ e\-mail shouldn't be in there.
I fixed it.
But still; why isn't the maildirsize being recreated when it's not
there?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Jan van den Berg
Verzonden:
Ok so basically I have two problems:
1. I dont understand why the maildirsize file isn't automatically
created when it's not there.
2. I have set a quota limit of 10MB and (extra) 8MB on the Trash folder.
Mar 10 16:09:46 mx01 dovecot: auth(default): master out: USER 4
roka-05 uid=1001
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:45 +, Daniel Watts wrote:
I feel there is an error in the logic of the sort by From column. If you
sort by this column, the messages are re-ordered in alphabetical order
using the *email address* as the sorted word.
However most people these
On 3/10/2008, Jan van den Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
2. I have set a quota limit of 10MB and (extra) 8MB on the Trash
folder.
? Why on earth would you set such ridiculously low quotas?
--
Best regards,
Charles
Wow,
Formulating the problem for the maillist really helps my find the answer
myself :)
quota_rule=maildir:storage=10M
quota_rule2=Trash:storage=8M
should be
quota_rule=*:storage=10M
quota_rule2=Trash:storage=8M
Now it works!
(Also maildirsize gets created automatically now).
Cheers,
Jan
Warning: mail_extra_groups setting was often used insecurely so it is
now deprecated, use mail_access_groups or mail_privileged_group instead
I use the following:
mail_extra_groups = mail nogroup
Because I have the real and virtual accounts.
What's the correct way to
Hi!
I have a config like this (globalsieverc):
require fileinto;
if address :domain :is to domain.de {
if header :matches X-Spam-Level \\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\* {
#discard;
fileinto spamdir;
}
}
else {
# The rest goes into INBOX
# default is implicit
Hello,
but i think that solution will have problems with TLS (TLS going
through 143 port).
2008/3/10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:44:21 -0800,
Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried to set this up (multiple certs for multiple
hostnames) with
Asheesh,
Sorry about the long delay. I tried upgrading to version 1.0.12,
which I understood to be the newest release for CentOS 5.I am
still experiencing the problem. What should I try next?
Thanks,
Ben
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Ben Julian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just read
* Timo Sirainen dovecot@dovecot.org:
So far so good. Now just in case... could I tell dovecot to read the
OpenLDAP client settings from a non default configuration file e.g.
/etc/dovecot/ldaprc.
I know Cyrus SASL can do this with the ldapdb plugin and I'd be interested
if this is
This is 1.0.13, the processes crashed a few seconds apart from each
other:
GNU gdb 6.7.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is
Hello,
Well... thanks to the input of all of you I have my dovecot-ldap
connection working for almost all of my clients, however...
on outlook, a message for certificates being trusted comes up, the user
clicks yes and connection fails.
Questions:
Do I have to get an ssl certificate to
Hello all,
I've got an issue I'm almost positive is not related to Dovecot, but was
wondering whether anyone else has had similar problems or could
duplicate my results. Please accept my apologies if this is considered
off-topic or this issue is actually just a symptom of my own ignorance.
I'm moving to IMAP and trying to understand all the details of where to
save email. The system is CentOS running sendmail - procmail which
delivers as:
DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
I'm trying also to use Usermin as the webmail client. I can get mail to
deliver to $HOME/Maildir/ and I can get
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:12:37PM -0400, Peter Tripp wrote:
Hello all,
I've got an issue I'm almost positive is not related to Dovecot, but was
wondering whether anyone else has had similar problems or could duplicate
Me: SYN
Paradox: SYN, ACK
Me: ACK
Me: Client Hello
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 13:02 -0300, Dâniel Fraga wrote:
Warning: mail_extra_groups setting was often used insecurely so it is
now deprecated, use mail_access_groups or mail_privileged_group instead
I use the following:
mail_extra_groups = mail nogroup
Because I have the real
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:04:19PM -0700, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Joseph Norris wrote:
Questions:
Do I have to get an ssl certificate to make it work? ( cost ouch!)
Is there a way around this using my own self-signed certificates?
Is there a cheaper ssl certificate
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 15:17 -0500, Ben Julian wrote:
Mar 3 10:37:00 servername dovecot: POP3(user): mbox sync: UID
inserted in the middle of mailbox /var/mail/user (84873 84872,
seq=2, idx_msgs=3)
This is the main problem, these shouldn't happen. Can the user access
the mailboxes directly?
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:14:13 +0200
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It depends on what you use the mail and nogroup for. The
mail_privileged_group is used for creating dotlocks to directories where
you normally don't have write access (/var/mail). mail_access_groups
gives the process
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 23:10 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
#0 0x080a2754 in imap_bodystructure_write (part=0x80fc7b0, dest=0x80fcb60,
extended=true) at imap-bodystructure.c:344
344 text = data-content_type == NULL ||
#0 0x080a2754 in imap_bodystructure_write
27 matches
Mail list logo
