Timo,
I was wondering If I can help you in spotting the cause of this
assertion failure (got this morning with rc5)
adding some i_info/debug and other seq_range_exists tests.
This morning all assertion failures were caused by users that deleted
with thunderbird many emails from inbox and
hello,
I'm quite new to dovecot. My instalation is working good
Debian Etch
- exim: 4.63-17
- dovecot: 1.0.rc15
I'm using virtual user setup, with LDA delivery method. There is no database
backend at this
time.
Is there any way to configure exim to reject
Hi.
What does the warning Inotify instance limit for user exceeded,
disabling. mean, and how do I get rid of it? I assume that I have to
change a limit somewhere?
Regards,
Anders.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc5.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc5.tar.gz.sig
I have updated the ManageSieve patch to apply cleanly against the new
Dovecot 1.1.rc5 release:
Anders wrote:
What does the warning Inotify instance limit for user exceeded,
disabling. mean, and how do I get rid of it? I assume that I have to
change a limit somewhere?
Okay, reading the source has me think that this is an OS limit, so I
increased /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches
Is
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 18:13 -0700, David Jonas wrote:
Upon upgrading from 1.0.2 to 1.1rc4 I see this error for many of our users:
Getting size of message UID=1 failed
Couldn't init INBOX: Can't sync mailbox: Messages keep getting expunged
Logging in with IMAP I
Mateusz Kijowski schreef:
Hi,
I was wondering - are there any plans on switching the sieve plug-in to use
libsieve (http://libsieve.sourceforge.net/)? The rationale of using this
library is simple - cmusieve codebase seems stagnant and libsieve promises to
implement some new sieve rfc
On May 5, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Anders wrote:
Anders wrote:
What does the warning Inotify instance limit for user exceeded,
disabling. mean, and how do I get rid of it? I assume that I have to
change a limit somewhere?
Okay, reading the source has me think that this is an OS limit, so I
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Apr 4, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Michal Soltys wrote:
Could you try if this works:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/9edaf878bb96
Both global and per-user chroot settings work fine with that patch.
Thanks !
/ I'm testing a new setup of postfix using deliver to put the messages
into the user's maildir, and am curious if there is a way to make
deliver create custom maildirs when it delivers to a valid user without
a maildir?
Right now it only creates the inbox, I'd like it to create the .sent/
.Trash/
Timo Sirainen wrote:
They're added when IDLE command is run. Only one IDLE command can be
running at a time per each connection. With maildir it listens for two
directories. But there is only one instance created per process.
So each process has one inotify instance with just two watches. I
on 5-4-2008 2:05 AM Neal Becker spake the following:
I'd like to mirror my dovecot server (which only serves myself). I'm
thinking to use gmail. Problem is, I don't want all my mail going to gmail
in plain text. I'd like to gpg+mime encrypt each mail using my public key.
Any thoughts on how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'd suggest to change the default value of log_timestamp to something with
complete date and time. Currently the string is missing the year. Maybe,
%F (ISO date) would fit best.
Bye,
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Steve Roemen wrote:
/ I'm testing a new setup of postfix using deliver to put the messages
into the user's maildir, and am curious if there is a way to make
deliver create custom maildirs when it delivers to a valid user without
a maildir?
I don't know as far as deliver,
Hello list.
I'm using dovecot as a local server, where I'm the only user (or so), and I
appreciate using icedove searching functionality to roam through the whole inbox
in search of some specific string in the body of my emails.
Unfortunately, recently, such a search has become impossible, since
On 5/5/2008, Asheesh Laroia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I don't know as far as deliver, but what I do is put the mailboxes I
want to be sure exist in my /etc/skel. That way, on user creation,
the directories are already there.
That only works for system users, not for virtual users...
--
Perhaps the autocreate plugin can do this.
2008/5/5 Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 5/5/2008, Asheesh Laroia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I don't know as far as deliver, but what I do is put the mailboxes I want
to be sure exist in my /etc/skel. That way, on user creation, the
On May 5, 2008, at 9:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list.
I'm using dovecot as a local server, where I'm the only user (or
so), and I
appreciate using icedove searching functionality to roam through the
whole inbox
in search of some specific string in the body of my emails.
On 5/5/2008, Juan Asensio Sánchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Perhaps the autocreate plugin can do this.
Well... sounds perfect, but where would I look for this?
Its not on the 'Plugins' page anywhere:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins
--
Best regards,
Charles
Here: http://dovecot.org/patches/1.1/
How to compile (in spanish ;)):
http://wiki.nutum.es/linux/samba/samba_ldap_mds/compilacion_paquetes_dovecot
Regards
2008/5/5 Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 5/5/2008, Juan Asensio Sánchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Perhaps the autocreate plugin
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 22:28 +0100, Ed W wrote:
Ed W wrote:
I have also had one report from a customer who thought he had 600
messages to download (based on the feedback from OE), but his inbox
would only have had a couple of messages in it - not sure that this is
related though...
I finally figured out what's happening:
v1.0 writes expunges as plain expunged records to dovecot.index.log
file. v1.1 treats such records as expunge requests, while the actual
expunging is done by writing another expunged (ext) record.
With v1.1 dovecot.index file isn't always required, because
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I finally figured out what's happening:
v1.0 writes expunges as plain expunged records to dovecot.index.log
file. v1.1 treats such records as expunge requests, while the actual
expunging is done by writing another expunged (ext) record.
With v1.1 dovecot.index file isn't
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I finally figured out what's happening:
v1.0 writes expunges as plain expunged records to dovecot.index.log
file. v1.1 treats such records as expunge requests, while the actual
expunging is done by writing another expunged (ext) record.
With v1.1 dovecot.index file isn't
One more thing came to my mind:
On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 05:04 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
5. dbox support
- Message text can't just be written to a file and renamed. At minimum
some dbox metadata needs to be written to it.
- Files can't be shared between mailboxes by hard linking like they
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:46 -0700, David Jonas wrote:
Anyway, this fixes the problem:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/b776f2b8d827
Well, it looked good but pop3 processes started accumulating and pretty
soon the load was over 50. No errors were getting logged. strace showed
some
Not sure about 1.0, I don't run it anymore :) But a few users discovered
for a small issue that only affects a very small portion of my userbase
where instructional correction will suffice. I guess I am reporting it
in the interest of getting it out there, and I can live with it if not
fixed
On May 6, 2008, at 4:20 AM, Adam McDougall wrote:
Not sure about 1.0, I don't run it anymore :) But a few users
discovered for a small issue that only affects a very small portion
of my userbase where instructional correction will suffice. I guess
I am reporting it in the interest of
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:46 -0700, David Jonas wrote:
Anyway, this fixes the problem:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/b776f2b8d827
Well, it looked good but pop3 processes started accumulating and pretty
soon the load was over 50. No errors were getting logged. strace
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 00:17 -0500, Adam McDougall wrote:
$3 = {offset = 40896, stream_errno = 70, last_failed_errno = 70, overflow
= 0, closed = 1,
real_stream = 0x678500}
Ah, 70 = Stale NFS handle in FreeBSD. Linux used something else. Squat
still needs some
Bump :)
Adam McDougall wrote:
In the past I dabbled with the imap quota plugin with the fs backend
because I wanted
to report usage to my users (not limit them). At the time, the quota
plugin would make
dovecot crash when trying to write to a folder (I can bring up this
report if needed).
This happened a while back, I was running 1.1rc3 up until today so I have no
idea
if it would have an effect. Sorry if its something that has been fixed. The
error below was repeated many many times, I deleted the index so the user would
stop getting disconnected (although I didn't hear any
32 matches
Mail list logo
