I saw some past chatter on this in the list archives, but here is
another stab and another rational.
This patch follows a similar patch to openssh in that it allows any
key in the specified keytab to match the incoming host key. This is
necessary for multihomed hosts. See:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 11, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 11, 2008, at 8:23 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
If an IPv4 address is specified as 'host', a dovecot proxy is created
for clients connecting using IPv6 to this server, and symmetrically
if the proxy is specified as
I was afraid somebody was going to say that. Thanks for your reply, I'll
try that sometime later this week. I'll report back how it all went.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Koekkoek
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Aria Stewart
Sent: Monday, August
I cooked this up while trying to figure out why thunderbird on Windows
w/ SSPI was not working, but it turned out thunderbird does not use
it, so I haven't been able to test it yet. I'm presenting it for
discussion only, unless someone else can try it :)
Modern versions of MIT kerberos support
If anyone's interested, especially client developers. It's been a bit
quiet there after the initial rush.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Randall Gellens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: August 1, 2008 5:08:39 AM EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [MORG] IMAP5 List
At the MORG BOF,
Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 8/11/2008, Mathieu Kretchner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So here is my next environment :
how many mailbox ?
5000
with adequate hardware/RAM, no problem
how many users ?
6000
again - with adequate hardware/RAM, no problem
Ok it seems to be great, but wath do
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On Aug 11, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
High Performance without hacking conf files !
http://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning lists some of the things you
can tune, but the defaults should be pretty good (although some default
settings prefer
On Aug 12, 2008, at 3:41 AM, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Database user ?
LDAP
Here is an other problem : we don't have uid/gid stored in our LDAP
database. Do we have to configure dovecot with a dovecot specific
user/group ?
Yes, one or more (for one you have mail_uid/gid settings with
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 8/11/2008, Mathieu Kretchner ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
So here is my next environment :
how many mailbox ?
5000
with adequate hardware/RAM, no problem
how many users ?
6000
again - with adequate hardware/RAM, no problem
Ok it
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
I cooked this up while trying to figure out why thunderbird on Windows
w/ SSPI was not working, but it turned out thunderbird does not use
it, so I haven't been able to test it yet. I'm presenting it for
discussion only, unless someone else can try it :)
thunderbird does
--On Tuesday, August 12, 2008 3:17 AM -0400 Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If anyone's interested, especially client developers. It's been a bit
quiet there after the initial rush.
Very interesting. Thanks for the forward. I'll send this on to the Mulberry
developer list.
One
Hi all,
I have a dovecot setup with virtual users and a passwd-file passdb. All
users have the same uid and gid. Recently I got my public folders
working using namespaces and they work great. However, now I'm trying
to share a folder between a limited number of users and so far I failed
I am using this simple sieve script to do vacation:
require [fileinto, vacation];
if exists X-Spam-Flag {
stop;
}
vacation
:days 1
:subject Out of office reply
:addresses [email address hidden, email address hidden ]
I am on vacation until 2008-08-07.
If you have something urgent, please
Am 12.08.2008 13:32 schrieb Josef Liška:
…
But it sends vacation messages with null envelope sender, which is in my
opinion undesirable, because many vacation messages are caught in spam
filters.
I think there could be same sender on envelope.
In dovecot-sieve/src/sieve-cmu.c around
Josef Liška schreef:
But it sends vacation messages with null envelope sender, which is in
my opinion undesirable, because many vacation messages are caught in
spam filters.
I think there could be same sender on envelope.
In dovecot-sieve/src/sieve-cmu.c around line 380 is a call to
On 8/12/2008, Josef Liaka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
But it sends vacation messages with null envelope sender, which is in
my opinion undesirable,
It is not only desirable, as Stephan already pointed out to someone
else, it is per the spec:
This behavior is implemented as such on purpose.
And I wish to deity. that the IMAP protocol had feedback elements to inform the
user of appropriate usage of IT resources, such as green/yellow/red indicators
denoting info on the size of messages about to be sent, quotas, etc.
Oh, yes, and that the imap alert, part of UWIMAP be made part of
Hi,
we are providing Mail-Service (POP3, IMAP; either TLS or SSL) to 22000
students here at my university.
There are 2 machines running as active-passive cluster with DRBD to sync
the maildata. Each box is a 4 core Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5160 @ 3.00GHz
with 8 gigs RAM.
After a tuneup for
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
PS : awesome mailing list... so reactive !
Welcome to dovecot. :-)
What i may say - you should try a dovecot and 99% of your question will
expire.
P.S. Please tune your mail client to make reply-to field to
dovecot@dovecot.org then you write a message here.
Thanks for everyone's input. I was already sudoed to root before
running any of the operations so it wasn't that. May have been that
--with-storages error I'd made. I tried your config John, with mods
for my system and besides having to add the dovecot user/group
manually it seems to be running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan,
Thank you. I understand what you are saying in trying to keep a
vicious cycle of auto-replies responding to each other. But in our
environment I don't have any choice as our central virus/spam email
gateway will can any message without a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josef,
This is exactly same situation in our environment as well. I had to
make the same change as you stated. Our central virus/spam email
gateway also cans any message with out a valid from address in the mail
headers. I would think most
Hi
I'm using dovecot imap with ldap accounts. User management interface is
phamm. Internal clients connect directly using imap client. External
clients must use webmail (squirrelmail). But not everyone is supposed to
use webmail. Is there any way to control who is allowed to log in from a
On Aug 12, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
One thing I'd like to see is the ability of the server to notify the
client of updates on any folder, not just subscribed or open ones.
From what I understand, the client must poll all unsubscribed
folders, which can be expensive. If one
CJ Keist escreveu:
Stephan,
Thank you. I understand what you are saying in trying to keep a
vicious cycle of auto-replies responding to each other. But in our
environment I don't have any choice as our central virus/spam email
gateway will can any message without a valid from address in the
I've seen a number of posts discussing NFS based storage and issues with
Dovecot. When the term NFS is used - does this exclusively refer to
the Linux NFS network file system, or is it a generic reference to any
network file system? I don't recall seeing any posts referencing issues
with
On Aug 12, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I've seen a number of posts discussing NFS based storage and issues
with Dovecot. When the term NFS is used - does this exclusively
refer to the Linux NFS network file system, or is it a generic
reference to any network file system? I
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:26:28AM -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
I understand the concept of having the from empty, namely to keep
It's not just a concept but a rule set by some RFCs.
another automated system from replying back to your vacation reply, but
what do we do to keep our vacation
On 8/12/2008, CJ Keist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I understand what you are saying in trying to keep a
vicious cycle of auto-replies responding to each other. But in our
environment I don't have any choice as our central virus/spam email
gateway will can any message without a valid from address
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:27:40AM +0200, Angel Marin wrote:
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
I cooked this up while trying to figure out why thunderbird on Windows
w/ SSPI was not working, but it turned out thunderbird does not use
it, so I haven't been able to test it yet. I'm presenting it for
On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:44 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
This is how the SPNEGO works in libapache-mod-auth-kerb-5.3 which
simply passes SPNEGO packets directly to gssapi if the library is new
enough. There is even a configure feature test for the gssapi library
in that packages configure script.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 01:11:47PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:44 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
This is how the SPNEGO works in libapache-mod-auth-kerb-5.3 which
simply passes SPNEGO packets directly to gssapi if the library is new
enough. There is even a configure feature
Hi there,
I have the problem that the antispam filter is looking in a different
subdirectory (I think is the domain subfolder) than the actuallly used i.e.,
The following error message is constant:
~
Aug 12 12:07:58 mail dspam[4540]: Unable to
On Aug 8, 2008, at 3:55 AM, Hodges wrote:
Just installed dovecot 1.1.2. downloaded from dovecot.org. Seemed to
compile and install OK but I get the following error when I try to
start it
child 28410 (auth) returned error 89 (fatal failure)
This shows that dovecot-auth process exited.
On Aug 8, 2008, at 2:01 AM, Pavel Shirov wrote:
Recently my network was scanned. Various services was scanned, and
checking
the logs of mail server the following string draw my attention:
mail dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected: user=ttejmgpfip,
method=PLAIN,
rip=87.228.15.180, lip=x.x.x.x
On Aug 8, 2008, at 1:17 AM, John Wood wrote:
Can you still reproduce this crash? http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html
lists some things about how to get a core dump.
I changed things to try to get a core and, of course, for nearly a 2
weeks got nothing at all. Figures. After you released 1.1.2
On Aug 8, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
Dovecot is crashing on a certain user inbox which is in mbox format as
well as one of the users other mbox files. The crash doesn't exactly
match what is listed in the aforementioned wiki page, so I thought
their
might be some other
On Aug 8, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Stephen Feyrer wrote:
Thanks, I will persevere. I would like to point out that I'm only
using PAM as it seems the best way to get email to system users. I
am open to another method that might work.
Anything that allows you to log in without password checking.
On Aug 8, 2008, at 9:59 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
I see these errors more often than I'd like from Dovecot-1.1.2 on
Mac OS X 10.5.4 (names and numbers elided):
One or more users?
Corrupted index cache file %s: Corrupted virtual size for uid=%d:
%d != %d
Corrupted index cache file %s: Broken
On Aug 8, 2008, at 10:30 PM, Jeff Koch wrote:
We're using dovecot with qmail and vpopmail and are having problems
with major inaccuracies in the mail quota usage maintained in the
maildirsize file. Although the file starts off accurate after we
delete it and force a rebuild it quickly
On Aug 12, 2008, at 6:07 AM, Andrew Von Cid wrote:
I have a dovecot setup with virtual users and a passwd-file passdb.
All users have the same uid and gid. Recently I got my public
folders working using namespaces and they work great. However, now
I'm trying to share a folder between a
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Jan wrote:
I'm using dovecot imap with ldap accounts. User management interface
is phamm. Internal clients connect directly using imap client.
External clients must use webmail (squirrelmail). But not everyone
is supposed to use webmail. Is there any way to
Am 12.08.2008 16:35 schrieb Jan:
Hi
I'm using dovecot imap with ldap accounts. User management interface is
phamm. Internal clients connect directly using imap client. External
clients must use webmail (squirrelmail). But not everyone is supposed to
use webmail. Is there any way to
On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Pascal Volk wrote:
Am 12.08.2008 16:35 schrieb Jan:
Hi
I'm using dovecot imap with ldap accounts. User management
interface is
phamm. Internal clients connect directly using imap client. External
clients must use webmail (squirrelmail). But not everyone is
On Aug 7, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Thursday, August 07, 2008 3:37 PM -0400 Timo Sirainen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you used Dovecot's deliver, the deny passwd should have worked,
but
I've no idea about procmail.
I'll note that I'm using procmail because of the
http://dovecot.org/patches/1.1/listescape-plugin.c should help. I also
committed a couple of fixes to hg to fix the error message.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:27:40AM +0200, Angel Marin wrote:
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
I cooked this up while trying to figure out why thunderbird on Windows
w/ SSPI was not working, but it turned out thunderbird does not use
it, so I haven't been able to test it yet. I'm
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:23:19PM +0200, Angel Marin wrote:
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:27:40AM +0200, Angel Marin wrote:
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
I cooked this up while trying to figure out why thunderbird on Windows
w/ SSPI was not working, but it turned out
I'll note that I'm using procmail because of the ability to filter
and run SpamAssassin from it.
Typically you'd run SpamAssassin first and Dovecot deliver after
that.
Is anyone here doing this for virtual users who could describe what
they did?
Bonus points for actual configuration files
On Jul 26, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jul 26, 2008, at 10:05 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
I think the imap-login processes will hang around if there are SSL
or
proxy connections through them (but perhaps they shouldn't be
listen-ing for new connections?).
It would be
Jordan Hayes wrote:
I'll note that I'm using procmail because of the ability to filter
and run SpamAssassin from it.
Typically you'd run SpamAssassin first and Dovecot deliver after that.
Is anyone here doing this for virtual users who could describe what
they did?
Bonus points for actual
On Jul 24, 2008, at 3:10 PM, aledr wrote:
Is It possible to integrate this patch into next dovecot's releases?
It implements the -w ( disable webmail [IMAP from localhost*] access
) option when using vpopmail.
I'd rather not hardcode 127.0.0.1 address. Could you try if this patch
works:
On Jul 29, 2008, at 12:20 AM, Alexey Gorbov wrote:
I have this messages in log:
Jul 29 00:02:56 10.0.4.16 dovecot: imap-login: Can\'t connect to
auth server
at default: Resource temporarily unavailable
Has this happened more than once?
In this way users can't connect top pop3, imap
On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Dario Ale wrote:
But, if I configure a high global quota and a small quota for INBOX,
sent a mail that is more big that quota for INBOX, then quota is not
applied and the mail is delivered to INBOX.
The quota configuration doesn't really work the way you think
On Aug 5, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Dean Brooks wrote:
Is there a way to implement a --without-bzlib style option so people
can disable compilation of some of these plugins?
Added: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/0dd6386cbc93
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
How do we start troubleshooting this?
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Aug 12 18:27:19 Error: Sendmail process
terminated abnormally, exit status 70
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Aug 12 18:27:19 Info: sieve runtime error:
Vacation: Error sending mail
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Aug 12 18:27:19
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you all for the input and the rfc url. To my surprise the central
IT dept. is going to make the change to allow the envelope from to be
empty! I'm pretty sure it was the rfc url I gave them to help my cause.
So I'm reverting the code back to
Hello, a bit of a problem with Dovecot. Version is 1.0.15 and is a
default install (no changes to config) from FC8 repository... except
that Dovecot is configured to use Maildir
I have a user on the system who uses the tags in Thunderbird (Important,
Personal etc). When she tags the messages
Typically you'd run SpamAssassin first and Dovecot deliver after
that.
Is anyone here doing this for virtual users who could describe what
they did?
Bonus points for actual configuration files :-)
What SMTP server are you running?
Sendmail.
Timo,
Thanks for bringing it up.
I dealt with i18n MUA. I would love to see i18n from IMAPEXT
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5255.txt) be part of IMAP5, the mechanism,
not all language translations, of course :)
And I guess no MUA needs to 'ENABLE' anything in IMAP5.
Joseph
PS. I had
On 11 Aug 2008 at 8:24, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
How are you calling deliver in postfix? Do you see in postfix's logs the
messages being handled to deliver?
Hmm, oddly enough, adding a .forward in the users home dir with
| /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
Then everything works. Any
Hello!
You can use sendmail/MailScanner/Spamassassin/deliver/procmail.
Maybe you find my procmail patch usefull.
http://markmail.org/message/v4gga3ba75xqemra
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-March/020787.html
If you need any help just let me know it.
BTW: Timo please fix the bugs
On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:52 PM, Joseph Yee wrote:
Timo,
Thanks for bringing it up.
I dealt with i18n MUA. I would love to see i18n from IMAPEXT (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5255.txt
) be part of IMAP5, the mechanism, not all language translations, of
course :)
Dovecot v1.1+ currently
63 matches
Mail list logo
