-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:38:50PM -0300, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote:
Hello All,
[...]
It is well known that preforking is a good pratice if you want to
achieve a higher performance.
When I was asked about it I readily answered: of course it does.
Timo Sirainen escreveu:
I've heard that imapproxy isn't all that useful with Dovecot once auth
cache is enabled and set large enough. It'll then just basically
replace Dovecot's process fork(s) with the overhead of its own.
If I understand Dovecot's auth caching, it will save DB lookups (or
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 8/13/2008, Daniel Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The more I use Thunderbird the more I find it totally insane.
Did you file a bug report? I imagine this is something that could use
some fixing, and there is a much higher chance that the TBird devs will
listen than
I am installing Dovecot for the sole purpose of maintaining a local mail
store that I could 1) manage with any client; 2) keep duplicated on
several machines, using Unison; 3) hopefully, index using Spotlight
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mh-e.user/1308 ...). In particular,
I have no
On Aug 15, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Timo Sirainen escreveu:
I've heard that imapproxy isn't all that useful with Dovecot once
auth cache is enabled and set large enough. It'll then just
basically replace Dovecot's process fork(s) with the overhead of
its own.
If I
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 15, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
If I understand Dovecot's auth caching, it will save DB lookups (or
sequential passwd-file lookups, etc), but it will still need to spawn
a new imap process for each connection the webmail does.
With imapproxy, the
On Thursday, August 14, 2008 3:46 PM -0400 Mike Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd like to use maildir with all my new users, but I'd like to be able to
continue using mbox for my old users and slowly convert them as I get
time.
I did this a week ago for about a dozen users and the system
A patch has been proposed for SpamAssassin to process Maildir folders of
spam:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3003
Is this patch compatible with Dovecot's implementation of Maildir? For
example, is anything needed to avoid stepping on Dovecot's metadata?
The master process exec's the mail process (imap or pop3) after fork.
gpg
2008/8/15 Sebastien Tandel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
It is well known that preforking is a good pratice if you want to
achieve a higher performance.
When I was asked about it I readily answered: of course it does. For
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A patch has been proposed for SpamAssassin to process Maildir folders of
spam:
Nothing on the disk looks modified by the code change, sa-learn is
just reading from the disk fand altering the sa-storage as instructed
by
I'm seeing strings of failed POP3 login attempts with obvious bogus
usernames coming from different IP addresses. Today's originated from
216.31.146.19 (which resolves to neovisionlabs.com). This looks like a
botnet attack. I got a similar probe a couple days ago. Is anyone else
seeing these?
On 8/15/2008, Kenneth Porter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm seeing strings of failed POP3 login attempts with obvious bogus
usernames coming from different IP addresses. Today's originated from
216.31.146.19 (which resolves to neovisionlabs.com). This looks like
a botnet attack. I got a
Charles Marcus wrote:
Dictionary attacks are a fact of life these days.
Just install some kind of blocking on your firewall (fail2ban is a good
one), and let it take care of the worst of it..
I wonder what they want by cracking a POP3 server. Read the user's
mails? It's true POP3 passwords
nervous_darting_eyes Hi Everyone. /nervous_darting_eyes
Ooops I just broke my dovecot install.
I've looked through the mailing list archives and not found anything
relevant.
When I try to connect to my mail server I get this message.
Could not connect to mail server chen.home.org;
On Aug 15, 2008, at 5:39 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
You're kidding, right?
Dictionary attacks are a fact of life these days.
Just install some kind of blocking on your firewall (fail2ban is a
good
one), and let it take care of the worst of it...
fail2ban will not work for this as the
Stephen Feyrer wrote:
nervous_darting_eyes Hi Everyone. /nervous_darting_eyes
Ooops I just broke my dovecot install.
I've looked through the mailing list archives and not found anything
relevant.
When I try to connect to my mail server I get this message.
Could not connect to mail server
On Friday, August 15, 2008 5:39 PM -0400 Charles Marcus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just install some kind of blocking on your firewall (fail2ban is a good
one), and let it take care of the worst of it...
Thanks, researching it now
Looks like an RPM might be available for CentOS 5. There's
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
Dictionary attacks are a fact of life these days.
Just install some kind of blocking on your firewall (fail2ban is a good
one), and let it take care of the worst of it..
I wonder what they want by cracking a POP3 server. Read the user's
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Stephen Feyrer wrote:
nervous_darting_eyes Hi Everyone. /nervous_darting_eyes
Ooops I just broke my dovecot install.
I've looked through the mailing list archives and not found anything
relevant.
When I try to connect to my mail server I get this message.
Could not
--On Friday, August 15, 2008 5:51 PM -0400 Bruce Bodger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fail2ban will not work for this as the incoming ip addresses are
spoofed. fail2ban would end up blocking legitimate servers.
How do you spoof a source address on a TCP connection? I was unaware that
was
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 06:43:30PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
Dictionary attacks are a fact of life these days.
Just install some kind of blocking on your firewall (fail2ban is a good
one), and let it take care of the worst of it..
I wonder what they want
Hello!
I'm running squirrelmail 1.4.8 (I know this is not the latest version) and
know I'm having troubles with:
1.) Folder list view
2.) Save to sent or Drafts folder.
Configuration worked well. I think it has to do with the upgrade from
dovecot 1.0 to 1.1 and the LIST command.
Stephen Feyrer wrote:
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Stephen Feyrer wrote:
nervous_darting_eyes Hi Everyone. /nervous_darting_eyes
Ooops I just broke my dovecot install.
I've looked through the mailing list archives and not found anything
relevant.
When I try to connect to my mail server I get
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Friday, August 15, 2008 5:51 PM -0400 Bruce Bodger
bruce.bodger at demval.com wrote:
fail2ban will not work for this as the incoming ip addresses are
spoofed. fail2ban would end up blocking legitimate servers.
How do you spoof a source address on a TCP connection?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 03:37:53PM -0300, Sebastien Tandel wrote:
[...]
[fork is fast]
OK, it measures the fork instruction. But fork is using a copy-on-write
mechanism ... It means that *none* of the parent's memory pages are copied.
Each
25 matches
Mail list logo
