Henrique Fernandes put forth on 1/21/2011 1:38 AM:
We are out of ideias to make it faster. We only came up making more ocfs2
cluster with smaller disks. With this we are gettng better performance. We
have now 2 cluster one with 4 TB other with 1 TB and are migrating some os
emails form 4TB to
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 01:08:09AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 23:50 +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
But this woun´t work if the maildir has been modified outside of
dovecot (i.e. webmail usage). Are there any simple interface I can use
in this short snippet for
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-20 4:06 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
I've been reading
a bit, and I think the issue is that postfix adds X-Original-To when
delivering to a mailbox - which delivery via smtp/lmtp isn't.
I'm not sure if postfix should be adding it - postfix applies
Hello, Timo.
You wrote 21 января 2011 г., 0:10:12:
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:21 +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Jan 20 12:19:25 lmtp(38939, l...@domain.com): Error: mkdir(./cur) in
directory /var/run/dovecot failed: Permission denied (euid=3(v-mail)
egid=3(v-mail) missing +w perm: .,
On 21.1.2011, at 10.47, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
doveadm mailbox status unseen inbox
This sounds great, but I'm struggeling to get it working... It complains
about:
$ doveadm -v mailbox status -u u...@example.com unseen inbox
doveadm(u...@example.com): Error: userdb lookup:
On 2011-01-21 4:30 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-20 4:06 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
I've been reading
a bit, and I think the issue is that postfix adds X-Original-To when
delivering to a mailbox - which delivery via smtp/lmtp isn't.
I'm not sure if postfix should be
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:08:26PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
$ doveadm -v mailbox status -u u...@example.com unseen inbox
doveadm(u...@example.com): Error: userdb lookup:
connect(/usr/local/dovecot-2.0.9/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb) failed: No
such file or directory
Then you'll
Seriously, isn't it time this thread died a peaceful death. It has long
since failed to to have any real relevance to Dovecot, except in the
most extreme sense. It has evolved into a few testosterone poisoned
individuals attempting to make this forum a theater for some mating
ritual. If they
Jan-Frode Myklebust put forth on 1/21/2011 5:49 AM:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:14:42PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Have you considered SGI CXFS? It's the fastest cluster FS on the planet by
an
order of magnitude. It uses dedicated metadata servers instead of a DLM,
which
is why it's so
Jerry put forth on 1/21/2011 7:53 AM:
Seriously, isn't it time this thread died a peaceful death. It has long
since failed to to have any real relevance to Dovecot, except in the
most extreme sense. It has evolved into a few testosterone poisoned
individuals attempting to make this forum a
Hi there,
I'm currently evaluating the idea of a multi-master setup where each
node shall hold a full copy of the mailboxes. Basically the idea is
to use NFS and dsync to keep those copies in sync. So I did some
tests with dsync and ran into a problem. Consider the following
scenario:
1)
On 2011-01-20 6:51 PM, Alex Cherniak wrote:
I'd like to allow a user to move messages between his folders on Dovecot
IMAP account, but prevent move/copy from different accounts (Exchange in
particular).
Outlook uses xx UID COPY 1 folder and then xx UID STORE 1 +FLAGS
(\Deleted \Seen) for
On 2011-01-20 6:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 23:50 +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
But this woun´t work if the maildir has been modified outside of
dovecot (i.e. webmail usage). Are there any simple interface I can use
in this short snippet for noticing that the index is
[]'sf.rique
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.comwrote:
Henrique Fernandes put forth on 1/21/2011 1:38 AM:
We are out of ideias to make it faster. We only came up making more ocfs2
cluster with smaller disks. With this we are gettng better performance.
We
On 20/01/2011 16:20, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
Same question!
I have about 1TB used and it takes 22 hrs to backup maildirs!
I have problens with ocfs2 in fouding the file!
Just an idea, but have you evaluated performance of mdbox (new dovecot
format) on your storage devices? It appears to
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 23:14 +, Ed W wrote:
- Zlib enabled
- COMPRESS initiated in the connection
- 30,000 messages in a single maildir folder
- IMAP SEARCH SINCE requested
- Dovecot 2.0.7 hangs without sending the closing stanza of the SEARCH
Fixed:
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:15 +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
1) Location1 and Location2 are in sync
2) A mail gets deleted on Location1 (via IMAP)
Via Dovecot v2.0 IMAP? What mailbox format? You haven't disabled index
files, right?
3) dsync mirror run to sync the two locations
Expected
I have considered the idea, but we just change from mbox to maildir about 4
months ago, and we have many problens with some accouts. We were using dsync
to migrate.
But once we choose mdbox we are sticky to dovecot, or gona have to migrate
all users again if we choose to use another imap server.
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:03 +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Jan 21 14:01:36 lmtp(17650, l...@domain.com): Error: (LEV-ADDITION) Replace
home (/) with chroot (/usr/home/hosted/v-mail/domain.com/lev)
Jan 21 14:01:36 lmtp(17650, l...@domain.com): Error: (LEV-ADDITION) Set
mail_home to
Hi
I have considered the idea, but we just change from mbox to maildir
about 4 months ago, and we have many problens with some accouts. We
were using dsync to migrate.
Out of curiousity - how did the backup times change between mbox vs
maildir? I would suggest that this gives you a
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:36:11AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
Easiest would be to just use a webmail app that talks IMAP and let it
talk directly to dovecot... ?
Yes, we want to implement that as soon as possible. Looking forward to
getting everything all maildirs completely managed by
Hi all, anyone having any problems with restarting the director? Every time I
bring down 1 of the director servers, reboot it, or just restart it for
whatever reason, im seeing all kinds of problems. Dovecot generally always
gives me this error:
Jan 20 22:49:55 imapdirector3 dovecot: director:
[]'sf.rique
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
Hi
I have considered the idea, but we just change from mbox to maildir about
4 months ago, and we have many problens with some accouts. We were using
dsync to migrate.
Out of curiousity - how did the backup
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 19:59 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I can take a look at it, but it would help if you were able to reproduce
the problem.
More clearly: Reliably reproduce this in a test setup :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 13:42 -0400, Cor Bosman wrote:
Hi all, anyone having any problems with restarting the director? Every
time I bring down 1 of the director servers, reboot it, or just
restart it for whatever reason, im seeing all kinds of problems.
Dovecot generally always gives me this
Henrique Fernandes put forth on 1/21/2011 9:50 AM:
Let me try explain better.
We have 3 virtual machines with this set up:
/dev/sda1 3.6T 2.4T 1.3T 66% /A
/dev/sdb1 1.0T 36G 989G 4% /B
/dev/sdc1 1.0T 3.3G 1021G 1% /C
/dev/sda1 on /A type
On 21/01/2011 17:50, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
I don't know if i got your question right, but before, while using
mbox, we had less users and much less quota, it was only 200MB now is
about 1GB. And before we did not have a good backup system, had many
problens.
We pretty much change to
[]'sf.rique
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
On 21/01/2011 17:50, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
I don't know if i got your question right, but before, while using mbox,
we had less users and much less quota, it was only 200MB now is about 1GB.
And before we
Jan 17 12:06:20 server dovecot: imap(@YYY): Panic: file
imap-client.c: line 570 (client_continue_pending_input): assertion failed:
(!client-handling_input)
I can reproduce this every time by sending any data in the same packet after
the tag IDLECRLF. For instance using nc:
$ nc
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:56 -0600, Mike Abbott wrote:
Jan 17 12:06:20 server dovecot: imap(@YYY): Panic: file
imap-client.c: line 570 (client_continue_pending_input): assertion
failed: (!client-handling_input)
I can reproduce this every time by sending any data in the same packet
Hi,
thanks for the quick response.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:21:44PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:15 +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
1) Location1 and Location2 are in sync
2) A mail gets deleted on Location1 (via IMAP)
Via Dovecot v2.0 IMAP?
Yes.
What
Henrique Fernandes put forth on 1/21/2011 12:53 PM:
But you asked before about haardware.
I asked about the hardware.
It is an EMC CX4, linked with ONE 1gbE to ONE dlink ( i am not sure but i
guess if full Gbit ) and from this dlink it conects to 4 XEN machines at
1gbit and in the virtual
Henrique Fernandes put forth on 1/21/2011 12:53 PM:
We think it is the ocfs2 and the size of the partition, becasue. We can
write an big file in a accetable speed. But if we try to delete or create or
read lots of small files the speed is horrible. We think is an DLM problem
in propagate the
I can't think of why any client would send IDLE+DONE in the same TCP packet.
Maybe not in the same packet, but network congestion or server overloading
could cause the IDLE and DONE to queue up together.
Oh, that's nice.
Glad to help.
Fixed now:
Hi.
I am running dovecot 1.2.9 here, allowing users to filter their mails
with the sieve plugin, and am using sieve to move mail tagged as
probably spam into the spam folder.
I'm now looking to get the expire plugin working as well. It does work
as described in the wiki: Once I manually
35 matches
Mail list logo
