I think a few people have complained about this combination being somewhat
broken, resulting in bogus "cached message size wrong" errors sometimes. This
fixes it:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/9b2931607063
On 24.1.2012, at 0.19, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:56:49PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>> No way to disable it without modifying code. I think SOGo should fix it
>> anyway..
>>
>
> Ok, thanks. SOGo will get fixed. I was just looking for a quick
> workaround while
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:56:49PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> No way to disable it without modifying code. I think SOGo should fix it
> anyway..
>
Ok, thanks. SOGo will get fixed. I was just looking for a quick
workaround while we wait for updated sogo.
-jf
On 23.1.2012, at 23.48, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> We have an imap-client (SOGo) that doesn't handle this status output while
> searching:
>
> * OK Searched 76% of the mailbox, ETA 0:50
>
> Is there any way to disable this output on the dovecot-side?
No way to disable it without modifyi
We have an imap-client (SOGo) that doesn't handle this status output while
searching:
* OK Searched 76% of the mailbox, ETA 0:50
Is there any way to disable this output on the dovecot-side?
-jf
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23.1.2012, at 21.13, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one
>> related to the other:
>>
>> 1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn't be
>> exceeded? That is, even if t
Timo Sirainen schreef op vr 20-01-2012 om 21:34 [+0200]:
> On 20.1.2012, at 0.30, Harm Weites wrote:
>
> > we want to use dovecot LMTP for efficient mail delivery from our MX
> > servers (running postfix 2.8) to our storage servers (dovecot 2.0.17).
> > However, the one problem we see is the lack
On 23.1.2012, at 21.13, Mark Moseley wrote:
> In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one
> related to the other:
>
> 1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn't be
> exceeded? That is, even if technically possible, that I shouldn't go
> over?
There's no de
In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one
related to the other:
1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn't be
exceeded? That is, even if technically possible, that I shouldn't go
over? Since we're 100% NFS, we've scaled servers horizontally quite a
bit. At
On 1/23/2012 8:38 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
> And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
>
You can't randomly change the port you receive mail on because
external MTAs have no way to find what port you're using. They will
*always* use port 25 and nothing else.
If your problem
Il giorno Mer 18 Gen 2012 15:56:41 CET, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
[...]
> You're using SQL only for passdb lookup.
[...]
> user_query isn't used, because you aren't using userdb sql.
Hi Timo,
thank you, I confirm everything you wrote. In order to help someone with
the same problem, when using virt
On 2012-01-23 14:50, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-23 9:41 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 2012-01-23 14:38, Amira Othman wrote:
And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Mail_Transfer_Protocol
Well, not precisely correct...
No
On 2012-01-23 9:41 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 2012-01-23 14:38, Amira Othman wrote:
And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Mail_Transfer_Protocol
Well, not precisely correct...
You *could* use a router that does port transl
On 2012-01-23 14:38, Amira Othman wrote:
And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Mail_Transfer_Protocol
And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
> Hi all
>
> I am using postfix 2.8 with dovecot-1.2.17-0_116.el5 on cento 5.7 server .
> when I changed smtp port from 25 to 587 from postfix configuration my mail
> server stops to receive emails.
That's normal.
> I think it s
* Amira Othman :
> Hi all
>
> I am using postfix 2.8 with dovecot-1.2.17-0_116.el5 on cento 5.7 server .
> when I changed smtp port from 25 to 587 from postfix configuration my mail
> server stops to receive emails.
That's normal.
> I think it sounds strange and I don't understand why this happe
On 2012-01-23 14:30, Amira Othman wrote:
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8 with dovecot-1.2.17-0_116.el5 on cento 5.7
server .
when I changed smtp port from 25 to 587 from postfix configuration my
mail
server stops to receive emails. I think it sounds strange and I don't
understand why this happe
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8 with dovecot-1.2.17-0_116.el5 on cento 5.7 server .
when I changed smtp port from 25 to 587 from postfix configuration my mail
server stops to receive emails. I think it sounds strange and I don't
understand why this happen any one can help me
Regards
Anyone?
W dniu 2012-01-10 10:34, l.chelchowski napisał(a):
>
Hi!
>
> Please help me with this.
> The problem exists when
quota-warning is executing:
>
> LOG:
> Jan 10 10:15:06 lmtp(85973):
Debug: none: root=, index=, control=,
> inbox=, alt=
> Jan 10 10:15:06
lmtp(85973): Info: Connect fr
Hi again, Timo:
On Viernes, 20 de Enero de 2012 20:16:01 Timo Sirainen escribió:
> On 01/20/2012 06:24 PM, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> > I'm having problems on a maildir due to dovecot returning an UID 0 to an
> > UID THREAD REFS command:
[...]
> Could you instead send me such a mailbox where you
20 matches
Mail list logo
