On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:44:33PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
additionally you should install imapproxy on the webserver
wehre your webmail is running and configure the webmail for
using 127.0.0.1 - so only one connection per user is
persistent instead make a new one for each
wehre your webmail is running and configure the webmail for
using 127.0.0.1 - so only one connection per user is
persistent instead make a new one for each ajax-request
Someone benchmarked Dovecot a while ago in this list with and without imapproxy
and the results showed that imapproxy simply
The only draw back I see with maildir is one file per message. This
it is mostly adventage.
makes it resilient to corruption that mbox sees (if a message gets
corrupted, you erase one message and that corruption won't propagate
even if you leave it in place). In many setups this also leads to
Hi,
I've just tried to add managesieve to our director server, and when I
try to connect they fail with
Jun 26 12:28:13 director2 dovecot: auth: Debug: client in:
On 26.6.2012, at 17.16, Joseba Torre wrote:
I've just tried to add managesieve to our director server, and when I try to
connect they fail with
Jun 26 12:28:13 director2 dovecot: auth: Debug: client in:
Am 2012-06-25 23:59, schrieb Daniel Parthey:
Hi Rolf,
Rolf wrote:
Now I came to my limits with this failure messages in
/home/rolf/.dovecot.sieve.log:
sieve: info: started log at Jun 25 20:22:54.
error:
msgid=1340648569.94073.yahoomailclas...@web190304.mail.sg3.yahoo.com:
failed to store
Hello everybody,
I am running debian wheezy for development and test, and I recently
upgrade to dovecot 2.1.7
I am using LDAP lookups, and virtual users with the same UID/GID.
Everything was working fine before, but now, I have this error when I
try to send an email to a local account:
On 2012-03-03 1:10 PM, Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net wrote:
Am 03.03.2012 um 13:07 schrieb Steven Haigh:
I'm just wondering if anyone knows if this got implemented? I've
beenlooking at doing this for quite some time...
Yes it was. It has been discussed extensively:
On 06/25/2012 08:37 AM, Trever L. Adams wrote:
On 06/25/2012 01:20 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Now what I would like to know is, which is better for virtual
hosting Maildir or mbox?
Basically my requirement is that I would like to separate users via
either individual folders and then put each
b) Make sure your local samba setup is joined to the domain. Make sure
it writes an appropriate krb5.keytab (/etc/krb5.keytab in my setup) as
part of its password management, etc.
net ads keytab add smtp/mail_server_fqdn
net ads keytab add imap/mail_server_fqdn
You may have to edit
On 06/26/2012 07:11 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
The only draw back I see with maildir is one file per message. This
it is mostly adventage.
Agreed.
makes it resilient to corruption that mbox sees (if a message gets
corrupted, you erase one message and that corruption won't propagate
even if
Hi,
After many hours of searching (!) and lots of testing procmail scripts, I found
the explanation I was looking for -- something you explained at
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-July/032551.html
That explains it.
Thing is, though, every time I've seen shared mailboxes -- really
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On 23.6.2012, at 13.21, Ed W wrote:
But I don't know, whether this is the sort of caching you are
referring to.
what's a point of caching imap, except your webmail service is not
locally connected (localhost or LAN) to imap server?
Asking for items
Quoting Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
It's stupid how webmail works but dovecot doesn't have a problem to
get new connections every now and then. just make sure you didn't
set up SSL by accident.
Would you mind explaining why you think it is stupid the way webmail
Rolf wrote:
Am 2012-06-25 23:59, schrieb Daniel Parthey:
Hi Rolf,
Rolf wrote:
Jun 25 20:22:54 rolf14 dovecot: lda(rolf): Error: setegid(privileged)
failed: Operation not permitted
Doesn't lda(rolf) mean it is being executed under user rolf,
not root or dovecot?
How exactly do you invoke
I'm trying to set up a dovecot server for which mail arrives in an mbox,
and mail is stored in a maildir. The wiki (see
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces) refers to this as Mixed mbox and
Maildir. It advises handling this situation by creating two
namespaces: one for the mbox and the other for
on 6/26/2012 1:35 PM Jonathan Ryshpan spake the following:
I'm trying to set up a dovecot server for which mail arrives in an mbox,
and mail is stored in a maildir. The wiki (see
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces) refers to this as Mixed mbox and
Maildir. It advises handling this situation
On 26.6.2012, at 21.34, J E Lyon wrote:
After many hours of searching (!) and lots of testing procmail scripts, I
found the explanation I was looking for -- something you explained at
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-July/032551.html
That explains it.
Thing is, though, every
Hello everyone,
I'm using the very good imaptest [0] tool to test my little imap server
implementation. I've tried to use the dovecot-crlf [1] file, but it looks like
there are some major issues :
$ grep -n In-Reply-To.*; tests/data/dovecot-crlf
479:In-Reply-To:
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 13:48 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 6/26/2012 1:35 PM Jonathan Ryshpan spake the following:
I'm trying to set up a dovecot server for which mail arrives in an mbox,
and mail is stored in a maildir. The wiki (see
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces) refers to this as
Rolf wrote:
Jun 25 20:22:54 rolf14 dovecot: lda(rolf): Error: setegid(privileged) failed:
Operation not permitted
Manual page man 2 setegid states that
setegid() sets the effective group ID of the calling process. Unprivi-
leged user processes may only set the effective group ID to
on 6/26/2012 2:19 PM Jonathan Ryshpan spake the following:
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 13:48 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 6/26/2012 1:35 PM Jonathan Ryshpan spake the following:
I'm trying to set up a dovecot server for which mail arrives in an mbox,
and mail is stored in a maildir. The wiki (see
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
Well, I had completely forgotten about it :) Reading my old mail:
There isn't a whole lot of state to be saved really. Mailbox GUID,
UIDVALIDITY,
HIGHESTMODSEQ gives the mailbox state. Then you have the
language/etc. states.
Clients could restore their
Timo: I'm not sure if you are saying that all client-side caching is wrong.
If so, I'm going to disagree with you, especially when dealing with more
complex data structures.
it is always good - on WAN links.
24 matches
Mail list logo
