ITERINDEX not showing subfolders.

# 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf Hello, we're using mail on NFS and the indexes on localdisk, with a director setup. (18K+ users) now to get more performance i thought to use the ITERINDEX option. however this has the side-effect on some mailboxes that it doesn't show the

Re: fts_solr: Error: fts_solr: received invalid uid '0'

On 07/10/2019 15:13, Fabian Kuran via dovecot wrote: Hi, Am 23.09.2019 um 09:36 schrieb Filip Hanes >: št 19. 9. 2019 o 15:30 Fabian via dovecot > napísal(a): Are there any other hints or tips regarding this „invalid uid

Re: Is imap "list" required before imap "select" for shared folder?

On 10/7/19 3:50 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 07/10/2019 22:23 Gene Smith via dovecot < dovecot@dovecot.org > wrote: I set up a shared mailbox with dovecot and it basically works. However, before I can imap SELECT or STATUS the shared mailbox I have to first do an imap

Re: Is imap "list" required before imap "select" for shared folder?

On 07/10/2019 22:23 Gene Smith via dovecot < dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote: I set up a shared mailbox with dovecot and it basically works. However, before I can imap SELECT or STATUS the shared mailbox I have to first do

Is imap "list" required before imap "select" for shared folder?

I set up a shared mailbox with dovecot and it basically works. However, before I can imap SELECT or STATUS the shared mailbox I have to first do an imap LIST, i.e, . list "" * If list is not done first, the imap select or status command on the shared mailbox results in a "NO" response

Re: CentOS 8 / 7

On 07/10/2019 15:11, Günther J. Niederwimmer via dovecot wrote: Hello List, I have to install a "new" system, what is the best way for this. I like to install a CentOS System but I only found dovecot for CentOS 7 is this compatible for CentOS 8 or have I to setup a CentOS 7 System ? The

CentOS 8 / 7

Hello List, I have to install a "new" system, what is the best way for this. I like to install a CentOS System but I only found dovecot for CentOS 7 is this compatible for CentOS 8 or have I to setup a CentOS 7 System ? The onboard dovecot is 2.2.36-5 :-( Thanks for a answer, -- mit

Re: fts_solr: Error: fts_solr: received invalid uid '0'

Hi, > Am 23.09.2019 um 09:36 schrieb Filip Hanes : > > > št 19. 9. 2019 o 15:30 Fabian via dovecot > napísal(a): > Are there any other hints or tips regarding this „invalid uid ‚0‘"-message? > from fts-solr source: > case SOLR_XML_CONTENT_STATE_UID: > if

Re: [ext] dovecot 2.3.7.2-1~bionic: Performance issues caused by excessive IO to ~/mdbox/mailboxes/INBOX/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.tmp

* Timo Sirainen : > >> But why is that? Why would the index file be updated so often? > > > > BTW: This post is a followup to my "2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?" post from > > back in July. > > Fixed by > https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/5e9e09a041b318025fd52db2df25052b60d0fc98 > >

Re: [ext] dovecot 2.3.7.2-1~bionic: Performance issues caused by excessive IO to ~/mdbox/mailboxes/INBOX/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.tmp

On 1 Oct 2019, at 16.45, Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot wrote: > > * Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot : > >> But why is that? Why would the index file be updated so often? > > BTW: This post is a followup to my "2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?" post from back > in July. Fixed by

Re: Sieve redirect is broken in 2.3.7.2 - signal 11

Thank you Stephan ! That was it. It works fine with the proper pigeonhole version. Let me write to the package maintainer to fix. Regards,   Laszlo On 2019. 10. 07. 11:09, Demonhost wrote: That's a good thought. I'm building from the alpine repo and I indeed see pigeonhole is 0.5.5

Re: Sieve redirect is broken in 2.3.7.2 - signal 11

That's a good thought. I'm building from the alpine repo and I indeed see pigeonhole is 0.5.5 https://git.alpinelinux.org/aports/tree/main/dovecot/APKBUILD?h=3.8-stable Let me build it with 0.5.7.2 Regards,   Laszlo On 2019. 10. 07. 10:45, Stephan Bosch via dovecot wrote: On 07/10/2019

Re: Sieve redirect is broken in 2.3.7.2 - signal 11

On 07/10/2019 10:17, Demonhost via dovecot wrote: Hi Stephan, Here it is: We still can't reproduce it here. First of all, did you update Pigeonhole along with Dovecot? This kind of weirdness can happen when Pigeonhole was compiled against a different version of Dovecot. You could

Re: Sieve redirect is broken in 2.3.7.2 - signal 11

Sorry, I figured some is still missing. Here is the updated one Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. p_strdup (pool=pool@entry=0x5579bc40, str=0x6d65642e6c69616d Cannot access memory at address 0x6d65642e6c69616d>) at strfuncs.c:51 51  strfuncs.c: No such file or

Re: Sieve redirect is broken in 2.3.7.2 - signal 11

Hi Stephan, Here it is: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. p_strdup (pool=pool@entry=0x5579bc20, str=0x6d65642e6c69616d Cannot access memory at address 0x6d65642e6c69616d>) at strfuncs.c:51 51  strfuncs.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt full #0  p_strdup