Stuart Henderson kirjoitti 14.3.2021 klo 23.38:
On 2021-03-14, lja@koti wrote: >> # 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > That's nowhere
near the latest Dovecot. > > Updated dovecot to bleeding edge, and still
got same issue.
# 2.4.devel (b0f498b69):
Stuart Henderson kirjoitti 14.3.2021 klo 23.38:
On 2021-03-14, lja@koti wrote:
# 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
That's nowhere near the latest Dovecot.
Updated dovecot to bleeding edge, and still got same issue.
# 2.4.devel (b0f498b69):
Stuart Henderson kirjoitti 14.3.2021 klo 23.38:
On 2021-03-14, lja@koti wrote:
# 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
That's nowhere near the latest Dovecot.
Ok, i check where to get latest sources from and test.
On 2021-03-14, lja@koti wrote:
> # 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
That's nowhere near the latest Dovecot.
On 2021-03-14 17:29, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress
> in implementing the RFC 6531?
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPUTF8_README.html
Sorry, I was on the wrong list.
is there hope to see dns server support
On 2021-03-14 17:26, Sylvhem wrote:
Le mardi 23 février 2021 à 13:50 +0100, Sylvhem a écrit :
It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last
time I heard about it, it was worked on.
Does anybody have news about that?
I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if
On 14/3/2021 6:52 μ.μ., Steven Varco wrote:
Hi All
I’m trying to establish a dovecot HA setup with two loadbalancers, running
keepalived for sharing a virtual public IP.
On the same machines I’m running a dovecot director which proxies the requests
to two underlying mail servers (on seperate
Hi All
I’m trying to establish a dovecot HA setup with two loadbalancers, running
keepalived for sharing a virtual public IP.
On the same machines I’m running a dovecot director which proxies the requests
to two underlying mail servers (on seperate machines).
Now I’m hitting the issue with the
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > > It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last
> > > time I heard about it, it was worked on.
> > > Does anybody have news about that?
> > >
> >
> > I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress
> > in implementing the RFC
> > It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last
> > time I heard about it, it was worked on.
> > Does anybody have news about that?
> >
>
> I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress
> in implementing the RFC 6531?
Le mardi 23 février 2021 à 13:50 +0100, Sylvhem a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last
> time I heard about it, it was worked on.
> Does anybody have news about that?
>
I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress
in
I have migrated beginning this year from mbox to mdbox, but I am still
struggling with the concept of refcount=0 and where these message stay.
This is my test mailbox (shell script uses 'doveadm mailbox status -u')
[@ sbin]# mailbox-ls.sh testtest size
listing mailboxes of testtest:
Archive
Hi,
Latest dovecot does not work with latest thunderbird. It does not react
to sent emails.
They are put to maildir by postfix a-ok.
The version of thunderbird that works ok: 68.12.1
Distro:
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
Release: 20.04
Codename:
13 matches
Mail list logo
