On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 09:53 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
I just replaced my drives for Dovecot using Maildir format with a pair
of Solid State Drives (SSD) in a raid 0 configuration. It's really
really fast. Kind of expensive but it's like getting 20x the speed for
20x the price. I think the
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 20:19 +0100, Steve wrote:
I would not use MLC in a server environment. SLC has much better
program/erase cycles per cell.
I wouldn't be overly worried about the underlying medium.
I'm more worried about the translation layer they use on top of it, to
make it pretend to
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:41 +, Ed W wrote:
One of the systems to fail was a firewall running off SSD.
SSD or CF?
That doesn't make a lot of difference. They're all broadly similar.
There are better devices and worse devices, but they're mostly crap.
And as I said earlier, even if you
I've been working on Evolution's 'imapx' back end to support QRESYNC,
and was going to look at NOTIFY next. Then I realised I may have to look
at implementing it on the server side first.
Before I can even contemplate that, though, I had to mirror it into git.
I've always resisted the
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 11:55 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I had planned on leaving NOTIFY until I get mailbox list indexes
implemented
(http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-December/045480.html),
otherwise it's going to be annoyingly inefficient. Of course, feel free
to implement an
00 SELECT INBOX
* OK [CLOSED] Previous mailbox closed.
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft Junk $Label1 $Label2 $Label3
$Label4 $Label5 receipt-handled NotJunk NonJunk $MDNSent $has_cal unknown-6
OldNotJunk $Forwarded)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 13:58 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 13:51 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
01 UID FETCH 152280:* (UID)
* always matches the last message.
Ah, thanks. I hadn't realised that the 'start' and 'end' of a range are
actually interchangeable. RFC3501 does
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:48 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
This is a very nasty mess. If there are some ancient clients like pine
or whatever we used on vt100 in the 90th that need broken LIST command,
there should be a workaround setting for that.
Hey! I still use pine. With mouse-in-xterm
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 23:36 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
Well, it looks like at least Thunderbird v3.1.2 is buggy then. Are there
any non-buggy clients anyway ...?
Evolution (=2.30.2) with the imapx back end gets it right. I know this
because I fixed it myself a few weeks ago.
--
David
, N-27, N-81, N-243, N-729,
etc. in the QRESYNC request.
Does that seem reasonable?
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 18:37 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Aug 18 22:07:31 twosheds IMAP(dwmw2): : Panic: file
mail-index-transaction.c:
line 637 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed:
(seq = t-first_new_seq
.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 18:04 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
And thanks for not (yet) making it reject the invalid command with the
1:* in it
I changed it in v2.0.
-- I'll need to come up with a strategy for migrating
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 17:02 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:32 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Or if you want flags for messages you haven't even seen yet,
1:4294967295 should work too.
1:4294967295 doesn't really fill me with joy either -- that assumes
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 22:48 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
most cell phones simply haven't got any ssh
terminal but have own IMAP clients.
Any J2ME-capable phone has an SSH client: http://www.xk72.com/midpssh/
My experience of the native IMAP clients in phones has been extremely
poor. My N97
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 23:30 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
Well, David, if evolution was not such an instable beast... we did few
evaluations from openSuSE10.3 up to 11.2 recently,
and it was a no-go, except for basic imap usage. As soon as more
connectors/plugins are involved, it is a
Most of my IMAP access is achieved by
'ssh $mailhost exec dovecot --exec-mail imap'.
I'm testing Dovecot 2.0, and this doesn't seem to work any more — and I
can't seem to work out how to make it work. The wiki page at
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0 has no mention of it.
I looked through
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 01:52 +, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Once upon a time in the dim and distant past, I believe I used to
run /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap directly. But that doesn't set the
environment up correctly, so isn't the right way to do it... is it?
Nowadays it does.
Ah, right.
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 12:21 -0500, Richard C. Cox wrote:
I'd like to archive e-mail as it ages into a
single IMAP archive directory. Ideally, I would like to set up a cron job to
search for e-mail in all of my imap directories that older that 'X' days and
move it to the archive directory.
Once upon a time I could configure my mailer to access my historical
archives by running something like
ssh $mailserver MAIL=maildir:~/Maildir-archive dovecot --exec-mail imap
I need to run /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap manually now, and I've fixed
that a while ago for my normal email access. But
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 18:44 +0100, Ben Morrow wrote:
/usr/libexec/dovecot/imap -o mail_location=maildir:~/Maildir-archive
Perfect. Thank you.
--
dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
21 matches
Mail list logo
