rog7...@web.de wrote:
User user1 and user2 shall get access to the mailbox info. We
define the accounts info~user1 and info~user2 with the same home
directory like info.
Isn't this the kind of scenario shared folders were made for?
Grüße,
Sven.
--
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
Maria Arrea maria_ar...@gmx.com wrote:
3º We have separate raids for indexes (raid 1+0) and mdboxes (raid 5).
We have almost 3 TB of gzipped mdboxes, and our backup (bacula) is
taking almost 16 hours to make a full backup. Our main problem is that
indexes are backupd hours before mdboxes, and
Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2012-02-27 12:59 PM, Adam Szpakowski a...@3a.pl wrote:
I do have a basic question... How many users will be in this new,
remote location? Will the traffic be so vast, that 1GbE link will not
be enough, or are you using two servers for
Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I am currently in the process of setting up an IMAP repository for
round 100 users
Currently the user authentication method is being handled via a
Windows Domain Controller.
The host OS for Dovecot will either be FreeBSD or CentOS.
Would Dovecot
Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/17/2012 07:36 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Kaya Samankayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I am currently in the process of setting up an IMAP repository for
round 100 users Currently the user authentication method is
being handled via a Windows Domain
Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Question: do you need public or shared folders?
I don't need anything apart from an IMAP storage solution. I don't
intend to tie in Dovecot with an MTA either as I will simply be using
this for storage.
Long story but we don't have any control
Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
Flat files are not evil or bad or slow per se, but you have to use
them the right way.
Thanks a lot for that info. I will research more into this but I maybe
overridden at some point :-(
Need to make a strong case!
Hmm.
Just because Microsofts way of
Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
Once we get setup this may come in quite handy! Not sure what's going
on currently as everyone above me is still quite set in using an SQL
DB as a mail storage system???
RDBMS where not designed for such a task. Using a relational database
as a storage
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 18.3.2012, at 0.28, Sven Hartge wrote:
mbox has big problems with concurrent writes, the bigger the mbox is,
the more problems you get. This is mainly caused by the meta-data of
a message (meaning flags, status, etc.) which is stored inside the
mbox file
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 06:14:10 -0400 Charles Marcus articulated:
On 2012-05-20 1:48 PM, Luuk@dovecot dove...@vosslamber.nl wrote:
SQlite is only 61Kb, no config is needed
If you start using MySQL, and the MySQL-database is changed because
of some upgrades to
Hi!
I am currently in the process of preparing a migration of our old
Courier-based IMAP/POP server setup to a Dovecot-based one.
During this process I came across the following problem with the
difference Courier and Dovecot handle deleted messages and mail quota.
Quote from
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 24.8.2012, at 15.02, Sven Hartge wrote:
Ignoring the content (or increasing the quota) of the Trash folder is
easy and no problem, but ignoring deleted messages seems impossible
without changes to the code.
..
So I propose an additional flag
Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org wrote:
Am 24.08.2012 15:13, schrieb Sven Hartge:
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 24.8.2012, at 15.02, Sven Hartge wrote:
Ignoring the content (or increasing the quota) of the Trash folder is
easy and no problem, but ignoring deleted messages seems
Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de wrote:
Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org wrote:
Am 24.08.2012 15:13, schrieb Sven Hartge:
Is is possible to forcibly expunge a message at once, directly after
a client has marked it as deleted? Kind of the opposite of the
lazy_expunge plugin?
hm perhaps
Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de wrote:
Nope, does not compile (dovecot-dev headers are installed):
OK, trying to fix this, without having any deeper knowlege of C
(anymore):
deleted-to-trash-plugin.c: In function ‘mailbox_open_or_create’:
deleted-to-trash-plugin.c:79: error
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 24.8.2012, at 16.13, Sven Hartge wrote:
quota_rule = *:storage=1G:ignoredeleted
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M
This can't be implemented race-condition-free without huge changes to code.
Damn, too bad.
I know for sure either my users or my 1st
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 25.8.2012, at 1.49, Sven Hartge wrote:
How about just disabling the quota enforcing and doing a nightly run
of some type of enforcing (sending notification email and/or
disabling new mail delivery until user has more quota again)?
As a last resort, yes
Angel L. Mateo ama...@um.es wrote:
El 25/08/12 09:23, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 25.8.2012, at 1.49, Sven Hartge wrote:
How about just disabling the quota enforcing and doing a nightly run
of some type of enforcing (sending notification email and/or disabling
new mail delivery until user has
Sascha Zucca zu...@systemschmiede.com wrote:
Am 31.08.2012 16:06, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 31.8.2012, at 16.59, Sascha Zucca wrote:
So i guess
* LIST (\Noselect \HasNoChildren) / Freigaben/
is the Problem...
Yes. The problem is, I don't see it even with v2.1.7. Although I do
see that when
Dennis Guhl d...@dguhl.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 01:31:18PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
Hi!
I want to use this to expunge all DELETED messages which have been in
that state for 24h or longer.
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/Expunge
Yes, I know about doveadm expunge.
I am
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 3.9.2012, at 14.31, Sven Hartge wrote:
I want to use this to expunge all DELETED messages which have been in
that state for 24h or longer.
Dovecot doesn't keep track of that information, so you can't.
I suspected this. Would be nice though.
Grüße,
Sven
Carsten Laun-De Lellis carsten.delel...@delellis.net wrote:
user_attrs = home=/vmail/%d/%n,=uid=5000,=gid=5000
This should be
user_attrs = =home=/vmail/%d/%n,=uid=5000,=gid=5000
You need the = before home like you did with uid and gid because
you are not assigning any LDAP attribute to
Hi!
I am about to migrate a perdition-based IMAP/POP3 proxy to Dovecot.
Unfortunately some users are behind a firewall/NAT setup which throws
away seemingly idle TCP connections sooner than the established default
of 24 hours (more likely after 30 minutes ...) resulting in all kinds of
weird
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 20.10.2012, at 19.39, Sven Hartge wrote:
My question is: does Dovecot2 use TCP-Keepalive on its sockets per
default or do I need to enable it some way I have not yet discovered?
It's the default yes. Of course Linux's default keepalive interval
Bradley Rintoul brint...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
I'm using Dovecot to provide IMAP services for Thunderbird clients.
The user's mail is stored in Maildir format and the individual emails
which the user receives are actually downloaded and put into the
Maildir repository using a Python email
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Currently if user is 1MB under quota and someone tries to deliver mail
that is over 1MB, Dovecot rejects the mail. But smaller mails aren't
rejected probably for days. So user might not even realize that they
didn't receive one of the mails. Also having a user
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So what do you think about v2.2 allowing delivery of one last mail even if
it brings the user over quota?
+1 only if configurable, and with an additional configurable quota
percentage value
Andre Bischof andre.bisc...@rheinsinn.de wrote:
2012/11/18 Daniel Parthey daniel.part...@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
Unsubscribed mailboxes are not shown in thunderbird, while subscriptions
being stored server side, not in your local thunderbird.
thank you, I guess that will be helpful - but
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 13.27, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 23/11/2012 08:07, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
BTW. Do you have multiple Dovecot backend servers? Director works
only when you're not using shared mailboxes..
I'm not happy to hear that, so if today we are
The Doctor doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Who is the best CA Certificate provider for Dovecot?
What do you mean by best?
Grüße,
Sven.
--
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 17.53, Sven Hartge wrote:
BTW. Do you have multiple Dovecot backend servers? Director works
only when you're not using shared mailboxes..
You can't reliably do it if the mailboxes are accessed directly via
NFS. The current idea to solve
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 27.11.2012, at 3.24, Sven Hartge wrote:
For implementing shared mailboxes between all user servers, I think
what would need to be developed is:
imapc_host = m-st-sh-01.example.com
imapc_master_user = %u
imapc_user = shared
Somehow being able to set
Andrzej Adam Filip a...@onet.eu wrote:
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
[...] The average size of an email worldwide today is less than 4KB,
less than one typical filesystem block. [...]
Do not confuse unix culture of mostly plain text only email messages
with MS Junk culture of
Javier de Miguel Rodríguez javierdemig...@us.es wrote:
We think that mdbox can help us in this. Does anybody has good
experiences migrating from maildir-mdox in large enviroments?
What about mdox performance reliability?
I haven't recently heard of corruption complaints about mdbox..
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 24.1.2011, at 23.17, Sven Hartge wrote:
I take this thread and jump in, since we (TH Mittelhessen, Germany) are
also investigating the move to Dovecot and we also have the same
situation as Javier: Courier with Maildir and Bacula as backup
solution, we
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 25.1.2011, at 0.11, Sven Hartge wrote:
Yes, but if you use mdbox_rotate_interval=1d and run the purging
before backups, I think there's a good chance that most of the
backed up mails will be new files that bacula hasn't seen before.
Do you mean new mails
Luigi Rosa li...@luigirosa.com wrote:
Disconnected for inactivity.
Protocollo: IMAP
Server: mail.xxx
Porta: 143
Codice errore: 0x800CCCDD
Have a look at http://markmail.org/message/ggdsfvxyhzstjwd6.
Hi all!
I have been reading http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/Configuration over
and over for the last two days, but something totally escapes my brain
right now:
How does
user_attrs = homeDirectory=home,quotaBytes=quota_rule=*:bytes=%$
get the quota from LDAP into dovecot? What are the LDAP
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 23.2.2011, at 0.17, Sven Hartge wrote:
user_attrs = homeDirectory=home,quotaBytes=quota_rule=*:bytes=%$
get the quota from LDAP into dovecot? What are the LDAP attributes used
quotaBytes is the LDAP attribute name which contains the quota limit in bytes
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 23.2.2011, at 0.38, Sven Hartge wrote:
and what does %$ mean?
It's the value of quotaBytes LDAP attribute. So the idea is that you
have:
ldap-attribute-name=dovecot-setting-name=dovecot-setting-value
So, %$ ist always the value of the referenced
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 23.2.2011, at 1.27, Sven Hartge wrote:
So, %$ ist always the value of the referenced attribute? What if
there are multiple values, by accident or by design?
Won't work right now.
Will it cause the mail to be bounced or just deferred? Or just
ignored
Joseba Torre joseba.to...@ehu.es wrote:
On Wednesday 23 February 2011 00:55:05 Sven Hartge wrote:
Given the following object:
dn: uid=foo,ou=bar
quotaBytes: 1
quotaBytes: 1000
As I see it, this is a desigh error; quotaBytes should be a single
valued attribute (like uid
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 23.2.2011, at 1.55, Sven Hartge wrote:
Given the following object:
dn: uid=foo,ou=bar
quotaBytes: 1
quotaBytes: 1000
What happens with
user_attrs = homeDirectory=home,quotaBytes=quota_rule=*:bytes=%$
in this case?
In multi-value
Hi!
I've got a segfault in managesieve while using:
sieve_extensions = -vacation -reject -spamtest -virustest -enotify -redirect
The problem seems to lie in -redirect.
Reason for excluding redirect from sieve is my users should not use
sieve to forward or redirect mails but use an external
fakessh @ fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
I do not understand certain things in your dovecot-n
in my dovecot -n
there is a
plugin {
plugin = autocreate managesieve sieve
sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve
sieve_before = /var/sieve-scripts/roundcube.sieve
sieve_dir = ~/sieve
sieve_global_path =
Stephan Bosch step...@rename-it.nl wrote:
Op 2-3-2011 15:15, Sven Hartge schreef:
I've got a segfault in managesieve while using:
sieve_extensions = -vacation -reject -spamtest -virustest -enotify -redirect
The problem seems to lie in -redirect.
The redirect command is part of the Sieve
Antonio Perez-Aranda aperezara...@yaco.es wrote:
I think that I need to modify /etc/ldap.conf to remap some attribute
with mailQuota from ldap, and then, try to catch this as arg.
Someone has pam+ldap+quota ?
Why PAM _and_ LDAP? Why not just only LDAP? LDAP+Quota works fine
over $here.
Antonio Perez-Aranda aperezara...@yaco.es wrote:
Yes I know and I have some nodes with dovecot+ldap
But this node need to login with module pam_imap, because it's use a
closed one time password system.
I'm trying with something like this:
userdb {
driver = passwd
args = uid=exim
Antonio Perez-Aranda aperezara...@yaco.es wrote:
2011/3/15 Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de:
Antonio Perez-Aranda aperezara...@yaco.es wrote:
userdb {
driver = passwd
args = uid=exim gid=exim quota=*:bytes=%$
}
BTW: I think it is very dangerous to use the exim-user and -group as
user
Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de wrote:
How can one assign different users different Quota?
So properly?
No, totally wrong, sorry.
quota_rule1 = userONE:storage=1G
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=100M
quota_rule3 = SPAM:ignore
quota_rule4 = userTWO:storage=5M
quota_rule5 = Trash:storage=50M
Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de wrote:
am 23.03.11 18:38 schrieb Dennis Guhl d...@dguhl.org:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 05:44:51PM +0100, Jim Knuth wrote:
am 23.03.11 17:33 schrieb Sven Hartges...@svenhartge.de:
How your different user quotas are configured depends on the userdb
backend you use.
it`s
roberto palmarin rpalma...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm using postfix, LDAP, dovecot and horde for webmail.
user and password information is stored in LDAP. I'm attempting to get
password
aging working properly and am not having much luck.
even if password has expired user can login, can i tell
Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote:
On 1/4/2011 11:09 πμ, Sven Hartge wrote:
Have a look at the ppolicy slapd.overlay. This will solve your
problem.
I just wanted to mention that there are significant integration issues
of openldap ppolicy overlay in other software.
Right. You need
Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de wrote:
I have a user who has 153600 kBytes max. storage space. Now, however,
he has used already 167396 kBytes and he can receive e-mails and can
send. How can this be?
Your configuration is wrong?
Sorry, without any further information there is not much else to
Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de wrote:
am 03.04.11 17:13 schrieb Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de:
Jim Knuthj...@jkart.de wrote:
I have a user who has 153600 kBytes max. storage space. Now,
however, he has used already 167396 kBytes and he can receive
e-mails and can send. How can this be?
Your
Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de wrote:
if a user over quota is, he can do no mails more receive. So far, so
good. But why he can do, nevertheless, mails do send? Has that to do
something with dict option?
Sending mails has nothing to do with dovecot. You need to configure your
MTA to prevent the user
Christian Schmidt christian.schm...@chemie.uni-hamburg.de wrote:
Sven Hartge, 11.04.2011 (d.m.y):
Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de wrote:
if a user over quota is, he can do no mails more receive. So far, so
good. But why he can do, nevertheless, mails do send? Has that to do
something with dict
Papp Tamas tom...@martos.bme.hu wrote:
In table I see this:
| papp.ta...@center.hu | 118671994 |20437 |
du -sm says, the size of the maildir is 154M.
I use xfs.
I can't figure out, why is there a difference.
Can you help me out?
du also accounts for the metadata of the filesystem.
Papp Tamas tom...@martos.bme.hu wrote:
On 04/20/2011 01:47 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
du also accounts for the metadata of the filesystem. With Maildir++
you have many files per directory which causes the directory inode to
increase in size. After mails are deleted, the now empty space inside
Papp Tamas tom...@martos.bme.hu wrote:
On 04/20/2011 05:26 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Counting all meta-data is also very unintuitive for the user. Imagine
a user with an INBOX containing 200,000 mails. This will result in a
_huge_ directory inode for the INBOX folder (about 20MB for XFS). Now
Papp Tamas tom...@martos.bme.hu wrote:
On 04/30/2011 01:36 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
So, there is no exact or something closer solution with normal
maildirs?
Define exact.
I mean, how I can set a true quota usage for a user?
Define true quota usage.
Trust me, you don't want to include any
Papp Tamas tom...@martos.bme.hu wrote:
On 04/30/2011 02:24 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
I mean, how I can set a true quota usage for a user? Define true
quota usage.
Maximum usable space for a user on the disk.
The current implementation just works. Where is your problem with
that? You get
Jay Welch j...@interoceansystems.com wrote:
I have recently noticed that a random number of emails are being
stored in the cur folder under certain users and cannot be
downloaded in Thunderbird. I have tried moving the emails from cur
to new but everytime I try to download the email from
Adrian Ulrich adr...@blinkenlights.ch wrote:
I read that XFS is a good choice, but is not too reliable...
Are you using Maildir or MBOX?
In any case: XFS would be my last choice:
XFS is nice if you are working with large files ( 2GB), but for
E-Mail i'd stick with ext3 (or maybe even
Dr Matthew Williams matthew.willi...@bangor.ac.uk wrote:
We use LDAP to store our Maildir++ quota information for our Maildir
mailboxes. I notice in the documentation that only SQL and flat files
are supported by the dictionary quota if I want to use quota with
mdbox? Are there any plans to
rpalmarin rpalma...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sven Hartge sven at svenhartge.de writes:
Nikolaos Milas nmilas at noa.gr wrote:
On 1/4/2011 11:09 πμ, Sven Hartge wrote:
Have a look at the ppolicy slapd.overlay. This will solve your
problem.
Sorry for the delay in the response I checked the ppolicy
Stephen Bowman sbbow...@gmail.com wrote:
How does everyone handle this case?
Users are authenticated by LDAP, and do not have accounts on the
IMAP/dovecot server. When a new user is added to LDAP, the home
directory (/home/newuser) needs to be created on the IMAP/dovecot
server so dovecot
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 2.12.2011, at 0.41, Sven Hartge wrote:
Or switch to a virtual setup, where the users don't get real users on
the imap server (they can't log in, so they don't need any real user
on that server) and every mail is owned by your virtual mail user.
Well
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 2.12.2011, at 1.03, Sven Hartge wrote:
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
I hope some day there won't be any problems with Dovecot using
multiple UIDs.
Meaning?
There are different problems with multiple UIDs that are more
difficult to solve than
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
# 2.0.16: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32.36-xsserver x86_64 Debian 6.0.3
Have you tried using a modern kernel? that one is about 2 years old.
Well, this _is_ the kernel
Hi *,
I am currently in the planning stage for a new and improved mail
system at my university.
Right now, everything is on one big backend server but this is causing
me increasing amounts of pain, beginning with the time a full backup
takes.
So naturally, I want to split this big server into
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
It's highly likely your problems can be solved without the drastic
architecture change, and new problems it will introduce, that you
describe below.
The main reason is I need to replace the hardware as its service
contract ends this year and I am
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 1/7/2012 7:55 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
It's highly likely your problems can be solved without the drastic
architecture change, and new problems it will introduce, that you
describe below.
The main
Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de wrote:
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
If an individual VMware node don't have sufficient RAM you could build a
VM based Dovecot cluster, run these two VMs on separate nodes, and thin
out the other VMs allowed to run on these nodes. Since you can't
Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de wrote:
Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de wrote:
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
If an individual VMware node don't have sufficient RAM you could build a
VM based Dovecot cluster, run these two VMs on separate nodes, and thin
out the other VMs allowed
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 1/8/2012 9:39 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Memory size. I am a bit hesistant to deploy a VM with 16GB of RAM. My
cluster nodes each have 48GB, so no problem on this side though.
Shouldn't be a problem if you're going to spread the load over 2 to 4
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 1/8/2012 3:07 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Ah, I forgot: I _already_ have the mechanisms in place to statically
redirect/route accesses for users to different backends, since some
of the users are already redirected to a different mailsystem
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 1/8/2012 2:15 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Wouldn't such a setup be the Best of Both Worlds? Having the main
traffic going to local disks (being RDMs) and also being able to provide
shared folders to every user who needs them without the need to move
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 8.1.2012, at 0.20, Sven Hartge wrote:
Right now, I am pondering with using an additional server with just
the shared folders on it and using NFS (or a cluster FS) to mount the
shared folder filesystem to each backend storage server, so each user
has
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
The more I think about your planned architecture the more it reminds
me of a shared nothing database cluster--even a relatively small one
can outrun a well tuned mainframe, especially doing decision
support/data mining workloads (TPC-H).
As long
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 8.1.2012, at 0.20, Sven Hartge wrote:
Right now, I am pondering with using an additional server with just
the shared folders on it and using NFS (or a cluster FS) to mount the
shared folder filesystem to each backend storage server, so each user
has
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 9.1.2012, at 20.25, Sven Hartge wrote:
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 8.1.2012, at 0.20, Sven Hartge wrote:
Right now, I am pondering with using an additional server with just
the shared folders on it and using NFS (or a cluster FS) to mount
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 9.1.2012, at 20.47, Sven Hartge wrote:
Can mmap_disable = yes and the other NFS options be set per
namespace or only globally?
Currently only globally.
Ah, too bad.
Back to the drawing board then.
mmap_disable=yes works pretty well even if you're
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 9.1.2012, at 21.31, Sven Hartge wrote:
,
| # User's private mail location
| mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox
|
| # When creating any namespaces, you must also have a private namespace:
| namespace {
| type = private
| separator = .
| prefix
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 9.1.2012, at 21.45, Sven Hartge wrote:
| location = imapc:~/imapc-shared
What is the syntax of this location? What does imapc-shared do in this
case?
It's the directory for index files. The backend IMAP server is used as
a rather dummy storage, so
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 9.1.2012, at 22.13, Sven Hartge wrote:
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 9.1.2012, at 21.45, Sven Hartge wrote:
| location = imapc:~/imapc-shared
What is the syntax of this location? What does imapc-shared do in
this case?
It's the directory
Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de wrote:
I am currently in the planning stage for a new and improved mail
system at my university.
OK, executive summary of the design ideas so far:
- deployment of X (starting with 4, but easily scalable) virtual servers
on VMware ESX
- storage will be backed
David Morsberger d...@morsberger.com wrote:
I reported a problem with disappearing emails on my Apple Mountain
Lion server. Not sure if it ever stopped but I do know it is happening
again.
Help This is a company email server. They live and die by their
emails.
Emails show up in inbox
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
How about this, added to hg:
plugin {
# LDA/LMTP allows saving the last mail to bring user from under quota to
# over quota, if the quota doesn't grow too high. Default is to allow as
# long as quota will stay under 10% above the limit. Also allowed e.g.
Oscar A. Jara oaj...@frsf.utn.edu.ar wrote:
Hello, I am settiing up a dovecot (imap, pop, sieve, lda) + openldap
infrastructure. I need to store the timestamp of the last login of
each user in an attribute of its corresponding ldap object. I could
not find a way of doing this through
Hi Timo,
little cosmetic bug report:
using verbose_proctitle = yes shortens the proctitle of dsync to just
dsyn.
Example:
Note the whitespace instead of the 'c' in the proctitle:
root@m-st-01:~# ps auwwwx | grep [d]syn
virtmail 18141 13.0 0.1 49916 7952 pts/6R+ 00:49 0:00 dsyn -v
Lucas Rothamel - Eye Catching Webdesign i...@eye-catching-webdesign.de wrote:
I am currently running Dovecot 2.1 on current Debian and need to upgrade
to 2.2 to use the replication features.
I understand that I therefore need to compile Dovecot myself.
No. Just use the excellent packages
Gedalya geda...@gedalya.net wrote:
On 10/20/2013 05:39 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Lucas Rothamel - Eye Catching Webdesign i...@eye-catching-webdesign.de
wrote:
I am currently running Dovecot 2.1 on current Debian and need to
upgrade to 2.2 to use the replication features. I understand that I
Terry Barnum te...@dop.com wrote:
I'm curious how many people here use the zlib plugin. Is it common or
is drive space cheap enough that it's not worth it to run the risk of
potential problems?
HDD space may be cheap, but is also slow, therefor IOPS are very
expensive.
I compress the mail
Zachary Sturgeon zsturg...@pccc.com wrote:
I am researching using dovecot with an SQL database as the storage
backend. From what I've read, dovecot only supports mbox style file
storage, but I'd like to investigate the possibility of using a
database instead.
According to
Adrian Zaugg a...@ente.limmat.ch wrote:
Am 17.01.14 10:53 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 1/16/2014 6:56 PM, Murray Trainer wrote:
MTA = disk. Always has always will. Disk throughput is always the
critical factor for queue performance, and an MTA is little more than a
queue. Which makes it
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Sven, why didn't you chime in? Your setup is similar scale and I
think your insights would be valuable here. Or maybe you could repost
your last on this topic. Or was that discussion off list? I can't
recall.
Rather busy right now with a large
Joseph Tam jtam.h...@gmail.com wrote:
Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de wrote:
Interesting datapoint: NetApp Deduplication did only recover about 1%
of storage space with mdbox-based mail storage, while on an
maildir-based mail storage, the rate was about 15%. (This was tested
with a copy
Dominique dco...@hotmail.com wrote:
I just installed Dovecot2 on Ubuntu 12.04 server with postfix and
postfixadmin. I am using virtual users and virutal domains. When
using Thunderbird, Roundcubemail,iOS mail application on an iPad2 or
Kmail n Android, all mail sent and bounce shows up.
Larry Stone lston...@stonejongleux.com wrote:
On May 28, 2014, at 2:03 AM, Arthur Dent arthurdent.lon...@gmail.com wrote:
DELIVER=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
DESTDIR=/home/mark/mail/
:0 w
* ^List-Id:.*users.lists.fedoraproject.org
| $DELIVER -m $DESTDIR/MLists/Fedora
But that’s not
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
