Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot-deliver sometimes fails when message set to discard via sieve

2009-12-28 Thread Tobias Lang
Am 28.12.2009 um 11:55 schrieb Steve Wagner: if header :contains Organization web.de { discard; stop; } This often works, but sometimes it fails. Procmail reports then that deliver reported an error (but not which) and delivers them to my inbox. There are also no message in dovecots or

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot-deliver sometimes fails when message set to discard via sieve

2009-12-28 Thread Tobias Lang
Am 28.12.2009 um 13:02 schrieb Steve Wagner: Hi Tobi, yes but it is correct. It should only discard messages that have this header. The sieve filter is larger, this are only the parts witch use discard. Steve Am 28.12.2009 12:25, schrieb Tobias Lang: Am 28.12.2009 um 11:55 schrieb

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot-deliver sometimes fails when message set to discard via sieve

2009-12-28 Thread Tobias Lang
Am 28.12.2009 um 14:34 schrieb Steve Wagner: Ok ive tested it. The sieve script works as expected. The only error message i have, come from procmail.log: 24918-Folder: /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver 3720 24919-procmail: Error while writing to

Re: [Dovecot] checking all folders for new mail (IMAP STATUS command)

2009-12-28 Thread Tobias Lang
Am 28.12.2009 um 16:14 schrieb Florian Effenberger: Hi Tobias, This might be help you... **quote** If Thunderbird doesn't recognize that a folder contains unread messages try setting mail.imap.use_status_for_biff true. It causes Thunderbird to explicitly select each folder to update the

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot-deliver sometimes fails when message set to discard via sieve

2009-12-28 Thread Tobias Lang
Am 28.12.2009 um 15:09 schrieb Steve Wagner: [snip] :0 w | /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver Looks uncritical to me. Although there is no default rule at the end of .procmailrc, Dovecot deliver and Sieve should reroute everything not catched by a rule to INBOX. Did Procmails VERBOSE=on

[Dovecot] Fwd: Dovecot-deliver sometimes fails when message set to discard via sieve

2009-12-28 Thread Tobias Lang
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: Von: Steve Wagner lan...@lanwin.de Datum: 28. Dezember 2009 21:51:39 MEZ An: Tobias Lang tobias.l...@evoscout.de Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot-deliver sometimes fails when message set to discard via sieve Sorry it took some time to get

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot-deliver sometimes fails when message set to discard via sieve

2009-12-28 Thread Tobias Lang
Am 28.12.2009 um 21:51 schrieb Steve Wagner: Sorry it took some time to get in to this failing situation. Procmail log-- procmail: [29952] Mon Dec 28 21:36:33 2009 procmail: Match on 256000 procmail: Locking spamassassin.lock procmail: Executing /usr/bin/spamc,-U,/var/run/spamd.sock

[Dovecot] Using Dovecot deliver with Postfix

2009-12-29 Thread Tobias Lang
Hello, while installing Dovecot sieve, I am not able to deliver email for root. The strange thing is, that mails to ordinary users get delivered. And no, I do not use virtual mail, just ordinary unix accounts with an entry to passwd / shadow. Also before switching from Postfix deliver to

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot-deliver sometimes fails when message set to discard via sieve

2009-12-29 Thread Tobias Lang
Am 28.12.2009 um 11:55 schrieb Steve Wagner: if header :contains Organization web.de { discard; stop; } This often works, but sometimes it fails. Procmail reports then that deliver reported an error (but not which) and delivers them to my inbox. There are also no message in dovecots or

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole Sieve IMAP flag question

2009-12-29 Thread Tobias Lang
Am 29.12.2009 um 12:58 schrieb Julian Cowley: Hello, Here is a small script that I've been running to test a problem I've been seeing. Shouldn't this result in the mail being delivered to the inbox as a new message (ie. without the \Seen flag)? require imap4flags; addflag

Re: [Dovecot] Using Dovecot deliver with Postfix

2009-12-30 Thread Tobias Lang
Am 29.12.2009 um 22:34 schrieb Timo Sirainen: On Fri, 2009-12-25 at 13:30 +0100, Tobias Lang wrote: while installing Dovecot sieve, I am not able to deliver email for root. That's because you should be redirecting root's mails to some other user. root shouldn't have mail. Well, I do