Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 10:00 +0100, Daniel Watts wrote:
.Folder__1.new
.Folder__1.cur
.Folder__1.tmp
and
.Folder__2.new
.Folder__2.cur
.Folder__2.tmp
with Dovecot merging them before display as just Folder within the
mail client.
Virtual folders would enable
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I thought about saying this in v1.2.beta1 release annoouncement, but
looks like it'll take a few more days. So I've moved to Blacksburg,
Virginia and I'm now working for Mailtrust the rest of this year. Here's
some talk about it:
Congratulations Timo =) Best of luck out
Michael Carter wrote:
Hello,
I'm a developer on the Orbited project (http://www.orbited.org), which
provides a TCPSocket interface in javascript (emulated over HTTP using ajax
and comet.) This TCPSocket allows true bi-directional communication between
a web browser and an arbitrary tcp server.
Michael Carter wrote:
Hello,
I'm a developer on the Orbited project (http://www.orbited.org), which
provides a TCPSocket interface in javascript (emulated over HTTP using ajax
and comet.) This TCPSocket allows true bi-directional communication between
a web browser and an arbitrary tcp server.
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 8/13/2008, Daniel Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The more I use Thunderbird the more I find it totally insane.
Did you file a bug report? I imagine this is something that could use
some fixing, and there is a much higher chance that the TBird devs will
listen than
Using 1.1.2
We have:
# default namespace
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix =
inbox = yes
#location = maildir:/home/virtual/%h
#Maildir
}
# for backwards compatibility:
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix = mail/
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 8/13/2008, Daniel Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If i set the prefix to blank I only see my Inbox and Deleted folders.
Interestingly it shows 'Deleted' not 'Trash'. I guess Thunderbird
renames 'Trash'.
Maybe this is a TBird issue rather than dovecot? The Trash
I've noticed when I select a folder of messages (Thunderbird) and mark
them all as read (or unread) it produces the following IMAP transcript:
Source Destination Info
c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: DONE
s.s.s.s c.c.c.c Response: 20 OK Idle completed.
c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: 21 uid store 1:20
I've noticed when I select a folder of messages (Thunderbird) and
mark them all as read (or unread) it produces the following IMAP
transcript:
SourceDestinationInfo
c.c.c.cs.s.s.sRequest: DONE
s.s.s.sc.c.c.cResponse: 20 OK Idle completed.
c.c.c.cs.s.s.s
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:45 +, Daniel Watts wrote:
I feel there is an error in the logic of the sort by From column. If you
sort by this column, the messages are re-ordered in alphabetical order
using the *email address* as the sorted word.
However most people
the name as the sorted
element and NOT the email address.
If my email was [EMAIL PROTECTED], my emails, showing as 'Daniel Watts'
would come right near the bottom of the list rather than with the other
'D's near the top.
I know my email clients (Thunderbird and Outlook) both act like
Hi Timo,
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Daniel Watts wrote:
Is there not a more efficient way to do this? If Dovecot knows the
whole folder is being deleted (ie a Trash purge), could it do
something clever with the filesystem to just remove the whole folder?
If you use IMAP DELETE command
Hi,
I've straced a few dovecot processes after hitting purge on a large
Trash folder (35,000 messages). It looks like it is going through each
message, one by one, and removing (unlinking) each one.
Is there not a more efficient way to do this? If Dovecot knows the whole
folder is being
Hi Guys,
This has bitten us twice now. We're running Gentoo and emerge (ie
compile) a new version of Dovecot thinking we can finish that then
restart Dovecot in our own time.
It seems that Dovecot immediately starts to use the newly compiled
Dovecot binary and we get version mismatch errors
Troy Engel wrote:
Vicki Stanfield wrote:
Here is what I see in /etc/squirrelmail/config.php
$optional_delimiter = '.';
[snip]
$default_folder_prefix = '';
$trash_folder = 'Trash';
$sent_folder= 'Sent';
$draft_folder =
Vicki Stanfield wrote:
I have been struggling with getting my Fedora 7 box set up to use
dovecot with Squirrelmail and Maildir. It works correctly with the exception of
writing outgoing mail to the right folder (.Sent) or drafts (.Drafts). If I
send a mail with Mutt, it writes the mail to the
Hi,
I've just straced a dovecot imap process and found one thread sitting
there doing hundreds and hundreds of maildirsize updates as follows:
open(/home/virtual/mydomain.com/home/admin/Maildir/maildirsize,
O_RDWR|O_APPEND) = 7
read(7, 1048576S\n1562717408 107547\n-..., 5120) = 2446
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 19.12.2007, at 13.42, Daniel Watts wrote:
I've just straced a dovecot imap process and found one thread sitting
there doing hundreds and hundreds of maildirsize updates as follows:
What Dovecot version? v1.0.8 fixed one bug that caused this.
1.0.7 - will update
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/19/2007, Daniel Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yeah no idea what thunderbird thinks it is doing. Often have to close
the program and restart it (of course this is nothing to do with
dovecot - i suspect tb's caching management).
What platform? I use TBird
Following errors have happened quite a bit:
Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Transaction log file
/home/virtual/mydomain.com/home/peter.day/Maildir/.Trash/dovecot.index.log:
marked corrupted
Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL
[snip]
Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Corrupted transaction log file
/home/virtual/mydomain.com/home/peter.day/Maildir/.Trash/dovecot.index.log:
Append with UID 50, but next_uid = 15870
This is the real error. What kind of a system do you
My imap processes seem to all be running with a nice value of -15 (top
priority). Is this usual? Not sure if this is a dovecot setting or
something going on with my own system configuration somewhere.
I know the userdb query can set the nice value but mine (a mysql query)
does not...
We're
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 13:05 +, Daniel Watts wrote:
My imap processes seem to all be running with a nice value of -15 (top
priority). Is this usual? Not sure if this is a dovecot setting or
something going on with my own system configuration somewhere.
Normally
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 16:25 +, Daniel Watts wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 13:05 +, Daniel Watts wrote:
My imap processes seem to all be running with a nice value of -15 (top
priority). Is this usual? Not sure if this is a dovecot setting
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 07:27 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Changes since beta7:
- Added a new raw mail storage backend which allows opening
files/streams as single mail mailboxes. deliver uses this now instead of
opening the incoming mail
Ed W wrote:
Religious wars about which is best aside - some mail clients seem to
default to using Sent Items folder for saving sent mail, and others
(many) default to Sent.
Seems that in the interests of compatibility and doing the right thing
(tm) that a symlink from one folder to the other
Dear Timo,
Would there be any sense in giving Dovecot the option to split folders
into multiple subfolders when they reached a specified size (probably
message count) limit?
Dovecot would monitor folders and when they reached, say, 10,000
messages, silently split the folder on the
Dear List,
Am accessing dovecot imap through squirrelmail.
Squirrelmail paginates the message list into pages.
All works fine except for the page one particular email is in. When I
try to open that page (or in fact click 'show all') the server returns:
ERROR: Bad or malformed request.
Query:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz.sig
Hopefully the next release can be v1.1.beta1. I'm not aware of any major
problems and I think I'm pretty much done with new features (except
Hi Guys,
We have:
auth_cache_size = 2048 #Kb
auth_cache_ttl = 900 #life of the cache
Seems to work well (though haven't tried looking at stats). Only problem
is that every so often, one of our new users tries to log in quickly
before the account is marked (in a db) as 'active'. They use
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 15:37 +0100, Daniel Watts wrote:
Seems to work well (though haven't tried looking at stats). Only problem
is that every so often, one of our new users tries to log in quickly
before the account is marked (in a db) as 'active'. They use the right
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 16:31 +0100, Daniel Watts wrote:
1. Is the expire time on a per-login basis or for the entire cache? If
someone logs in 14 minutes after the last expiry is their data cached
for just 1 minute?
Oh, I think I misunderstood this question
32 matches
Mail list logo
