/%p, retr=%r/%b, del=%d/%m, size=%s
pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv
}
Regards, Mikkel
entry everything works as expected :-)
Regards, Mikkel
Den 14/06/12 10.14, Mikkel skrev:
Hello
In my installation the disable_plaintext_auth does not appear to take
effect.
I can see that the value is correct using doveconf -a but it doesn't
change anything.
Whenever attempting to log in using
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:59 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
In case of mdbox wouldn't you have the very same problem since larger
files may be fragmented all over the disk just like many small files in
a directory might?
I guess this depends on filesystem. But the files would
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:55 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
Some users would have mailboxes a several hundred megabytes and having
to recreate thousands of these every night because of a single mail
getting expunged a day could result in a huge performance hit.
It doesn't matter
-dbox after upgrading to
2.0 or is a completely new migration then needed?
Would this scenario be much different if the system is upgraded to
version 1.2 before the change to single-dbox?
Kind regards, Mikkel
).
This means that just reading the second line of the file will give you a
pretty good indication of whether dovecot has counted the usage correctly.
If dovecot has made an error just delete the maildirsize which will
cause dovecot to recount the usage.
Regards, Mikkel
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Mikkel wrote:
It has been my wish to move to dbox for a long time hoping to reduce
the number of writes which is really killing us.
BTW. Have you tried maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes setting? That should
reduce disk i/o, and I'm really
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Mikkel wrote:
Now the big question is whether multi-dbox and single-dbox are
compatible formats.
Kind of, but not practically.
If a Maildir-dbox migration is made on a system running dovecot v.
1.1, would it then be trivial later changing
perspective?
Regards, Mikkel
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 21:14 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
It has been my wish to move to dbox for a long time hoping to reduce
the number of writes which is really killing us.
BTW. Have you tried maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes setting? That should
reduce disk i/o, and I'm really
happen
with dbox under the same circumstances.
A very good reason to wait for 2.0 I guess...
Regards, Mikkel
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:41 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
And you've actually been looking at Dovecot's error log? Good if it
doesn't break, most people seem to complain about random errors.
Well, it does complain once in a while but it has never resulted
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:04 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
So basically you prefer mdbox but are maintaining dbox because of its
almost lockless design which is better for NFS users?
Do you consider it to be viable having two different dbox formats or are
you planning to keep only
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 23:52 +0200, Mikkel wrote:
But it should be able to heal itself using the backup files in version
2.0, right?
That's the theory anyway. :)
How often are they created anyway?
Whenever dovecot.index file would normally get recreated, the old one
more IO is an order of magnitude more expensive than getting more RAM or
CPU power (and dovecot barely needs any RAM and CPU anyway).
Best wishes, Mikkel
wont have to worry about how long the backup
takes to finish.
Regards, Mikkel
(Solaris).
Snapshots on UFS is a horrible thing for large file systems.
Snapshots on ZFS is marvellous (which I use). It does not result in any
extra IO whatsoever due to some clever designing.
If you have the option of using ZFS it's definitely the best way to do it.
Regards, Mikkel
in the last three seconds of this splendid
video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adc3MSS5Ydc).
Best regards, Mikkel
the enormous potential for speed gains).
Regards, Mikkel
really are moving off-topic here.
Regards, Mikkel
idea.
Regards, Mikkel
? Is it the same for both imap/pop3?
Although that shouldn't matter since the maildirsize should be updated
in any case..
The queries are exactly alike for POP3 and IMAP.
Thanks for looking into this.
Regards, Mikkel
happens if the code is
unable to read from or write to maildirsize)?
Regards, Mikkel
confusion if you use it too.
Dovecot always uses the dot-prefix on folder names in the file system but
this isn't really part of the IMAP/Sieve folder name that you wanna use.
Regards, Mikkel
(Mail directory under home):
http://wiki.dovecot.org/VirtualUsers#homedirs
(The new bug is described here:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-January/028062.html)
Do you need any further information?
Regards, Mikkel
/auth-master
mode: 384
user: vmail
plugin:
quota: maildir
quota_rule2: Trash:storage=10M:messages=100
trash: /local/config/dovecot-trash.conf
Regards, Mikkel
is delivered, but afterwards Deliver fails and returns the
error (listed in the bottom of this e-mail).
Beats me why.
You wrote in a previous mail:
msgid=20080107212004.782C817DB8 at mta01.euro123.dk: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(mikkel at euro123.dk): Jan 07 22:20:14 Panic: file
index-mail.c: line
1042
to
the parent directory isn't possible.
I tried to look at your commit but my C-skills (don't have any) aren't
quite enough to decide whether you took this into consideration already:)
Regards, Mikkel
Just tested hg 20080110 with the same result.
- Mikkel
the delivery error it returns and the core dump.
Regards, Mikkel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tail -f /log/deliver.log | grep @euro123.dk
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Jan 07 22:20:02 Error:
nfs_flush_file_handle_cache_dir: rmdir(/nfs/euro123.dk/mikkel) failed:
Invalid argument
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Jan
v1.1 betas on the same setup including b12).
Ref.:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-December/027702.html
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-December/027704.html
Regards, Mikkel
On Fri, January 4, 2008 1:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any news on the b13 compile issue on Solaris 10 (both Sparc and X86)?
I found this looking through your commits:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/d45c3058b91a
Guess that'll fix it, thanks.
All betas so far have compiled without problems on my setup, but something
breaks in b13.
This problem occurs with both make and gmake.
Below are outputs from make and gmake.
Regards, Mikkel
make all-recursive
Making all in src
Making all in lib
make all-am
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I
comes from the users.
Regards (and a happy new year), Mikkel.
doesnt support this considering
dovecot being much ahead of qmail in every other aspect.
By the way I use it for much the same tasks as you do; for spam reporting
but also for certain e-mails that need be put into another database
besides its mailbox.
Regards, Mikkel
On Sun, November 4, 2007 4:32 pm, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I didn't know that mail_nfs_index=yes resulted in a forced chown.
How come that's necessary with NFS but not on local disks?
It's used to flush NFS attribute cache. Enabling it allows you to use
multiple servers to access the same
, and sometimes completely).
This could be OS specific (Im using ZFS and Solaris 10 on Sparc) but it
may also be due to the way dovecot is programmed.
Theres always plenty of RAM and CPU available so thats not whats
causing troubles.
Is anyone else familiar with this issue?
Regards, Mikkel
(maybe writes could be grouped together or something like that).
Dovecot is very cheap on the CPU side so the only real limit in terms of
scalability is the storage.
Regards, Mikkel
present in all v1.1.x I think (some changes was made to the
error messages in b3 or b4 but believe this didnt change).
Regards, Mikkel
to my other post regarding
stalled/delayed I/O)
- Mikkel
On Sun, November 4, 2007 2:20 pm, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Well, if you use only clients that don't really need indexes they could
just slow things down. You could try disabling indexes to see how it works
then (:INDEX=MEMORY to mail_location).
I tried that earlier and it did result in less
On Sun, November 4, 2007 2:54 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could truss the hanging process to see what it's doing.
It's not an easy task since the delay is sometimes just a few (5-10)
seconds. And when there is a complete stall the client aborts before I can
find the process. But I'll
).
Since it's Perl it's not as fast as it could be but it should be just fine
for your needs.
- Mikkel
Is there a way around this?
- Mikkel
I somehow solved this compiling with gmake instead of make.
I think it's related to libiconv and not to Dovecot.
Sorry for the confusion.
- Mikkel
On Wed, October 17, 2007 1:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there
I'm using dovecot-1.1b2/b3 with deliver. All information is stored
else experienced at problem like this?
Best wishes, Mikkel
Configuration:
/opt/freeware/dovecot-1.1b3/sbin/dovecot -c /local/config/dovecot2.conf -n
# 1.1.beta3: /local/config/dovecot2.conf
Warning: fd limit 256 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load
(more than 768). Either grow
46 matches
Mail list logo
