Thanks a lot for all the answers. We already have high availability on
the storage, so we'll go with Timo's proposal, mainly because it's the
closer one to our current situation.
Thanks!
El Sábado 25 Julio 2009 a las 01:58, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On Jul 24, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Joseba Torre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
BTW. http://dovecot.org/talks/berlin-2009-07-02.pdf has a list of some
possible ways to cluster Dovecot.
IMO You should place all slides and conference papers online - at
least I did not found them on
On Jul 29, 2009, at 5:39 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
BTW. http://dovecot.org/talks/berlin-2009-07-02.pdf has a list of
some
possible ways to cluster Dovecot.
IMO You should place all slides and conference papers online - at
least I did not found
I think there is a whitepaper from Dovecot's current main sponsor
(before they were called Rackspace) which described their architecture
using pairs of servers and DRBD between them. Each server is moderately
loaded and active. If one server fails then half the users don't notice
and the
Ed W wrote:
I think there is a whitepaper from Dovecot's current main sponsor
(before they were called Rackspace) which described their architecture
using pairs of servers and DRBD between them. Each server is moderately
loaded and active. If one server fails then half the users don't notice
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 10:22 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Ed W wrote:
I think there is a whitepaper from Dovecot's current main sponsor
(before they were called Rackspace) which described their architecture
using pairs of servers and DRBD between them. Each server is moderately
loaded and
BTW. http://dovecot.org/talks/berlin-2009-07-02.pdf has a list of some
possible ways to cluster Dovecot.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge 2850 (2GB RAM and dual P4
Xeon 3,2GHz).
Joseba Torre schrieb:
Hi,
we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge 2850 (2GB RAM
Joseba Torre wrote:
Hi,
we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge 2850 (2GB RAM and
On Jul 24, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Joseba Torre wrote:
we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge
Anyone here trying any high availability strategies for mail servers?
(Ralph what do you do?)
I am reading up a little on DRBD + OCFS for a master/master setup but
this doesn't seem to address how to avoid having a single master proxy
process (assuming that we are running on rented equip and
12 matches
Mail list logo
