[Dovecot] NFS vs CIFS - and Dovecot

2008-08-12 Thread Daniel L. Miller
I've seen a number of posts discussing NFS based storage and issues with 
Dovecot.  When the term NFS is used - does this exclusively refer to 
the Linux NFS network file system, or is it a generic reference to any 
network file system?  I don't recall seeing any posts referencing issues 
with CIFS or SMBFS - is this because no one is using it, or because it 
just works instead of fiddling with NFS?

--
Daniel


Re: [Dovecot] NFS vs CIFS - and Dovecot

2008-08-12 Thread Timo Sirainen

On Aug 12, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:

I've seen a number of posts discussing NFS based storage and issues  
with Dovecot.  When the term NFS is used - does this exclusively  
refer to the Linux NFS network file system, or is it a generic  
reference to any network file system?  I don't recall seeing any  
posts referencing issues with CIFS or SMBFS - is this because no one  
is using it, or because it just works instead of fiddling with NFS?


I've only tested NFS, but since similar workarounds work for FUSE it's  
likely that they also work for CIFS/SMBFS. But there are additional  
issues with them, like you probably can't use ':' character (needed by  
Maildir) and I don't know if hard links are supported. I wouldn't  
recommend using without heavy stress testing. :)




PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part