On 3/17/2010 1:21 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 13:19 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
Since Exim wouldn't be touching the index files, is it safe to leave
exim as-is and let it handle the deliveries to the maildirs natively?
Exim's already got access to everything it needs
On 2010-05-26 1:21 PM, Mark Moseley wrote:
I've attached a slightly cropped rrd graph of NFS read bytes/sec on 6
mail netapps from one of our datacenters. See if you can spot where we
started moving IMAP to dovecot over the course of about a month :)
Wow, that's impressive... we had similar
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Mark Moseley moseleym...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
snip
I don't know if anyone has run local indexes in larger setups, so I
can't really give any good answers. The worst case of rebuilding the
whole index
First off, thanks for the reply. I appreciate it greatly!
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 17.3.2010, at 1.01, Mark Moseley wrote:
* Since Dovecot 2.0 seems like it's just around the corner, that's all
I've been testing, and indeed all I've even looked at.
On 3/16/2010 7:36 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 17.3.2010, at 1.01, Mark Moseley wrote:
* Since Dovecot 2.0 seems like it's just around the corner, that's all
I've been testing, and indeed all I've even looked at.
Yes, hopefully it's coming soon :)
* Our #1 main motivation for
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:15 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
* Our #1 main motivation for looking Dovecot is relief for our
currently overtaxed NFS servers, mostly in the form of the index
files. Benchmarking dovecot looks great, even with the index files in
the maildir.
Have you read the
Oops, forgot to ask one other thing
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 17.3.2010, at 1.01, Mark Moseley wrote:
snip
* Exim: We currently deliver all of our mail via Exim on separate
servers. Our POP3/IMAP servers only do POP3/IMAP and the Exim mail
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 13:19 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
Since Exim wouldn't be touching the index files, is it safe to leave
exim as-is and let it handle the deliveries to the maildirs natively?
Exim's already got access to everything it needs including the quota.
I just want to make sure I
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Tony Rutherford t...@bluetie.com wrote:
On 3/16/2010 7:36 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 17.3.2010, at 1.01, Mark Moseley wrote:
* Since Dovecot 2.0 seems like it's just around the corner, that's all
I've been testing, and indeed all I've even looked at.
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 13:27 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
I'll definitely keep that in mind. I should be able to keep things
pretty segregated in terms of POP3 alone or IMAP alone but my big
worry is that Courier POP3+Dovecot IMAP scenario.
I know a large installation that was (is?) using
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:15 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
From the wiki and from the
thread, it sounds like this just affects index files. One thing I
didn't see in the thread (though it'd be easy to miss in a thread that
long)
Hello to the list! I've been asked to spec out the feasibility and, if
feasible, plan a migration from Courier to Dovecot for both POP3 and
IMAP for about 4 million mailboxes. I've been trying to absorb all the
dovecot-related info I could over the past couple of weeks from the
docs and from the
On 17.3.2010, at 1.01, Mark Moseley wrote:
* Since Dovecot 2.0 seems like it's just around the corner, that's all
I've been testing, and indeed all I've even looked at.
Yes, hopefully it's coming soon :)
* Our #1 main motivation for looking Dovecot is relief for our
currently overtaxed NFS
13 matches
Mail list logo
