[Dovecot] Why is direct invocation of dovecot preferred over inet inclusion?

I'm used to putting things in inetd and, 1) should dovecot crash, I'd think it would get restarted if it was invoked from inet's imap-login 2) it would get started well after the boot ...wouldn't that be preferable. Enlighten me, please -- Stewart Dean, Unix System Admin, Henderson

Re: [Dovecot] Why is direct invocation of dovecot preferred over inet inclusion?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stewart Dean wrote: I'm used to putting things in inetd and, 1) should dovecot crash, I'd think it would get restarted if it was invoked from inet's imap-login 2) it would get started well after the boot ...wouldn't that be preferable. Enlighten