Re: [Dovecot] pigeonhole, regex, UTF-8

2010-07-14 Thread Perry E. Metzger
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:16:58 +0200 Stephan Bosch step...@rename-it.nl wrote: As a matter of fact, I haven't looked at TRE before. I'm quite interested though, since it is backwards compatible with POSIX and seems to be available in most systems. I'll give it a closer look, also in terms of

[Dovecot] pigeonhole, regex, UTF-8

2010-07-13 Thread Trever L. Adams
Hello, I am just learning about pigeonhole and thinking of using it. I see that regex doesn't supportf UTF-8. Any particular reason for this? If it is a library problem is the library, have you looked at tre? I am using it in a project (I am using it in wchar_t mode because elsewhere all

Re: [Dovecot] pigeonhole, regex, UTF-8

2010-07-13 Thread Stephan Bosch
Trever L. Adams wrote: Hello, I am just learning about pigeonhole and thinking of using it. I see that regex doesn't supportf UTF-8. Any particular reason for this? The standard regexp library does not support unicode and I was not planning to write my own regexp compiler any time soon. If

Re: [Dovecot] pigeonhole, regex, UTF-8

2010-07-13 Thread Trever L. Adams
On 07/13/2010 10:16 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: The standard regexp library does not support unicode and I was not planning to write my own regexp compiler any time soon. I wouldn't want to write one as well. As a matter of fact, I haven't looked at TRE before. I'm quite interested though, since