Re: [Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
> On April 7, 2017 at 6:54 PM Aki Tuomiwrote: > > > > > On April 7, 2017 at 6:48 PM "Daniel J. Luke" wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 7, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > >> On April 7, 2017 at 6:00 PM "Daniel J. Luke" wrote: > > >> On Apr 7, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On April 7, 2017 at 9:38 AM Timo Sirainen wrote: > > On 7 Apr 2017, at 2.25, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 6, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > >> Planning to release v2.2.29 on Monday. Please find and report any > > >> bugs before that. > > > > > > I'm seeing still seeing the assert that started showing up for me > > > with 2.2.28 > > > (https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-February/107250.html) > > > > > > Below I generate it using doveadm with dovecot 2.2.29rc1 (output > > > slightly cleaned up so the backtrace is easier to read) > > > > > > % sudo doveadm index -A \* > > > doveadm(dluke): Panic: file mailbox-list.c: line 1159 > > > (mailbox_list_try_mkdir_root): assertion failed: (strncmp(root_dir, > > > path, strlen(root_dir)) == 0) > > > > This is with mbox? I thought this had been happening already a long > > time.. Or if not mbox, what's your doveconf -n? > > >> > > >> this is mbox & lucene > > >> > > >>> for mbox and lucene, there is a workaround, which is to create > > >>> directory under the INDEXES directory called lucene-indexes. > > >>> > > >>> This way the directory creation is not attempted, this is a known bug, > > >>> but just hasn't been fixed yet. > > >> > > >> That directory already exists. > > >> > > >> mail_location = mbox:~/Mail/:INBOX=~/.mbox > > >> > > >> % ls -l ~/Mail/.imap/lucene-indexes/ > > >> total 429344 > > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 209M Apr 6 11:12 _30ms.cfs > > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 1.0M Apr 7 08:10 _30rt.cfs > > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 7.2K Apr 7 08:10 _30ru.cfs > > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 6.3K Apr 7 08:11 _30rv.cfs > > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 7.6K Apr 7 08:11 _30rw.cfs > > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:57 _30rx.cfs > > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30ry.cfs > > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30rz.cfs > > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 2.3K Apr 7 10:58 dovecot-expunges.log > > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke20B Apr 7 10:58 segments.gen > > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 244B Apr 7 10:58 segments_6214 > > >> > > >> When running 2.2.27 this doesn't happen. > > > > > > Can you try moving it one folder up, so that it's not under .imap? > > > > Sure, that fixes that, but I end up with lots of log messages like: > > > > 2017-04-07 11:43:53.958590-0400 localhost log[5770]: (libdovecot.0.dylib) > > indexer-worker(dluke): Error: Syncing mailbox lucene-indexes/_0.cfs failed: > > Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file > > > > (and the lucene-indexes "folder" appears in Mail.app, which is going to > > confuse some of my users) > > > > -- > > Daniel J. Luke > > Just wanted to factor in the bug. > > So.. as workaround, you *could* move indexes to separate directory, using > INDEXES= parameter. And move the lucene-indexes to this folder. But thank > you, this helps a bit. > > Aki Hi Daniel, https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/c42ec3f%5E...2bc82f0.patch we believe this fixes your issue. Aki
Re: [Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
> On April 10, 2017 at 8:31 PM "Daniel J. Luke"wrote: > > > On Apr 7, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > So.. as workaround, you *could* move indexes to separate directory, using > > INDEXES= parameter. And move the lucene-indexes to this folder. But thank > > you, this helps a bit. > > I'm happy to do anything else to test if you'd like. > > I did go ahead and set INDEXES and can confirm that this does work around the > bug. > > -- > Daniel J. Luke This will not make into 2.2.29 as it's being released very soon, but we'll try to fix this in 2.2.30 then. We have opened issue in our tracker. Aki
Re: [Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
On Apr 7, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Aki Tuomiwrote: > So.. as workaround, you *could* move indexes to separate directory, using > INDEXES= parameter. And move the lucene-indexes to this folder. But thank > you, this helps a bit. I'm happy to do anything else to test if you'd like. I did go ahead and set INDEXES and can confirm that this does work around the bug. -- Daniel J. Luke
Re: [Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
> On April 7, 2017 at 6:48 PM "Daniel J. Luke"wrote: > > > On Apr 7, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On April 7, 2017 at 6:00 PM "Daniel J. Luke" wrote: > >> On Apr 7, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On April 7, 2017 at 9:38 AM Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 7 Apr 2017, at 2.25, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > > > On Apr 6, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > >> Planning to release v2.2.29 on Monday. Please find and report any bugs > >> before that. > > > > I'm seeing still seeing the assert that started showing up for me with > > 2.2.28 > > (https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-February/107250.html) > > > > Below I generate it using doveadm with dovecot 2.2.29rc1 (output > > slightly cleaned up so the backtrace is easier to read) > > > > % sudo doveadm index -A \* > > doveadm(dluke): Panic: file mailbox-list.c: line 1159 > > (mailbox_list_try_mkdir_root): assertion failed: (strncmp(root_dir, > > path, strlen(root_dir)) == 0) > > This is with mbox? I thought this had been happening already a long > time.. Or if not mbox, what's your doveconf -n? > >> > >> this is mbox & lucene > >> > >>> for mbox and lucene, there is a workaround, which is to create directory > >>> under the INDEXES directory called lucene-indexes. > >>> > >>> This way the directory creation is not attempted, this is a known bug, > >>> but just hasn't been fixed yet. > >> > >> That directory already exists. > >> > >> mail_location = mbox:~/Mail/:INBOX=~/.mbox > >> > >> % ls -l ~/Mail/.imap/lucene-indexes/ > >> total 429344 > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 209M Apr 6 11:12 _30ms.cfs > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 1.0M Apr 7 08:10 _30rt.cfs > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 7.2K Apr 7 08:10 _30ru.cfs > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 6.3K Apr 7 08:11 _30rv.cfs > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 7.6K Apr 7 08:11 _30rw.cfs > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:57 _30rx.cfs > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30ry.cfs > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30rz.cfs > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 2.3K Apr 7 10:58 dovecot-expunges.log > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke20B Apr 7 10:58 segments.gen > >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 244B Apr 7 10:58 segments_6214 > >> > >> When running 2.2.27 this doesn't happen. > > > > Can you try moving it one folder up, so that it's not under .imap? > > Sure, that fixes that, but I end up with lots of log messages like: > > 2017-04-07 11:43:53.958590-0400 localhost log[5770]: (libdovecot.0.dylib) > indexer-worker(dluke): Error: Syncing mailbox lucene-indexes/_0.cfs failed: > Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file > > (and the lucene-indexes "folder" appears in Mail.app, which is going to > confuse some of my users) > > -- > Daniel J. Luke Just wanted to factor in the bug. So.. as workaround, you *could* move indexes to separate directory, using INDEXES= parameter. And move the lucene-indexes to this folder. But thank you, this helps a bit. Aki
Re: [Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
On Apr 7, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Aki Tuomiwrote: >> On April 7, 2017 at 6:00 PM "Daniel J. Luke" wrote: >> On Apr 7, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On April 7, 2017 at 9:38 AM Timo Sirainen wrote: On 7 Apr 2017, at 2.25, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > On Apr 6, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> Planning to release v2.2.29 on Monday. Please find and report any bugs >> before that. > > I'm seeing still seeing the assert that started showing up for me with > 2.2.28 > (https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-February/107250.html) > > Below I generate it using doveadm with dovecot 2.2.29rc1 (output slightly > cleaned up so the backtrace is easier to read) > > % sudo doveadm index -A \* > doveadm(dluke): Panic: file mailbox-list.c: line 1159 > (mailbox_list_try_mkdir_root): assertion failed: (strncmp(root_dir, path, > strlen(root_dir)) == 0) This is with mbox? I thought this had been happening already a long time.. Or if not mbox, what's your doveconf -n? >> >> this is mbox & lucene >> >>> for mbox and lucene, there is a workaround, which is to create directory >>> under the INDEXES directory called lucene-indexes. >>> >>> This way the directory creation is not attempted, this is a known bug, but >>> just hasn't been fixed yet. >> >> That directory already exists. >> >> mail_location = mbox:~/Mail/:INBOX=~/.mbox >> >> % ls -l ~/Mail/.imap/lucene-indexes/ >> total 429344 >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 209M Apr 6 11:12 _30ms.cfs >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 1.0M Apr 7 08:10 _30rt.cfs >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 7.2K Apr 7 08:10 _30ru.cfs >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 6.3K Apr 7 08:11 _30rv.cfs >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 7.6K Apr 7 08:11 _30rw.cfs >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:57 _30rx.cfs >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30ry.cfs >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30rz.cfs >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 2.3K Apr 7 10:58 dovecot-expunges.log >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke20B Apr 7 10:58 segments.gen >> -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 244B Apr 7 10:58 segments_6214 >> >> When running 2.2.27 this doesn't happen. > > Can you try moving it one folder up, so that it's not under .imap? Sure, that fixes that, but I end up with lots of log messages like: 2017-04-07 11:43:53.958590-0400 localhost log[5770]: (libdovecot.0.dylib) indexer-worker(dluke): Error: Syncing mailbox lucene-indexes/_0.cfs failed: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file (and the lucene-indexes "folder" appears in Mail.app, which is going to confuse some of my users) -- Daniel J. Luke
Re: [Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
> On April 7, 2017 at 6:00 PM "Daniel J. Luke"wrote: > > > On Apr 7, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On April 7, 2017 at 9:38 AM Timo Sirainen wrote: > >> On 7 Apr 2017, at 2.25, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > >>> > >>> On Apr 6, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Planning to release v2.2.29 on Monday. Please find and report any bugs > before that. > >>> > >>> I'm seeing still seeing the assert that started showing up for me with > >>> 2.2.28 > >>> (https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-February/107250.html) > >>> > >>> Below I generate it using doveadm with dovecot 2.2.29rc1 (output slightly > >>> cleaned up so the backtrace is easier to read) > >>> > >>> % sudo doveadm index -A \* > >>> doveadm(dluke): Panic: file mailbox-list.c: line 1159 > >>> (mailbox_list_try_mkdir_root): assertion failed: (strncmp(root_dir, path, > >>> strlen(root_dir)) == 0) > >> > >> This is with mbox? I thought this had been happening already a long time.. > >> Or if not mbox, what's your doveconf -n? > > this is mbox & lucene > > > for mbox and lucene, there is a workaround, which is to create directory > > under the INDEXES directory called lucene-indexes. > > > > This way the directory creation is not attempted, this is a known bug, but > > just hasn't been fixed yet. > > That directory already exists. > > mail_location = mbox:~/Mail/:INBOX=~/.mbox > > % ls -l ~/Mail/.imap/lucene-indexes/ > total 429344 > -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 209M Apr 6 11:12 _30ms.cfs > -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 1.0M Apr 7 08:10 _30rt.cfs > -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 7.2K Apr 7 08:10 _30ru.cfs > -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 6.3K Apr 7 08:11 _30rv.cfs > -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 7.6K Apr 7 08:11 _30rw.cfs > -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:57 _30rx.cfs > -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30ry.cfs > -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30rz.cfs > -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 2.3K Apr 7 10:58 dovecot-expunges.log > -rw--- 1 dluke dluke20B Apr 7 10:58 segments.gen > -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 244B Apr 7 10:58 segments_6214 > > When running 2.2.27 this doesn't happen. > -- > Daniel J. Luke Can you try moving it one folder up, so that it's not under .imap? Aki
Re: [Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
On Apr 7, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Aki Tuomiwrote: >> On April 7, 2017 at 9:38 AM Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 7 Apr 2017, at 2.25, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >>> >>> On Apr 6, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: Planning to release v2.2.29 on Monday. Please find and report any bugs before that. >>> >>> I'm seeing still seeing the assert that started showing up for me with >>> 2.2.28 (https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-February/107250.html) >>> >>> Below I generate it using doveadm with dovecot 2.2.29rc1 (output slightly >>> cleaned up so the backtrace is easier to read) >>> >>> % sudo doveadm index -A \* >>> doveadm(dluke): Panic: file mailbox-list.c: line 1159 >>> (mailbox_list_try_mkdir_root): assertion failed: (strncmp(root_dir, path, >>> strlen(root_dir)) == 0) >> >> This is with mbox? I thought this had been happening already a long time.. >> Or if not mbox, what's your doveconf -n? this is mbox & lucene > for mbox and lucene, there is a workaround, which is to create directory > under the INDEXES directory called lucene-indexes. > > This way the directory creation is not attempted, this is a known bug, but > just hasn't been fixed yet. That directory already exists. mail_location = mbox:~/Mail/:INBOX=~/.mbox % ls -l ~/Mail/.imap/lucene-indexes/ total 429344 -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 209M Apr 6 11:12 _30ms.cfs -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 1.0M Apr 7 08:10 _30rt.cfs -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 7.2K Apr 7 08:10 _30ru.cfs -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 6.3K Apr 7 08:11 _30rv.cfs -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 7.6K Apr 7 08:11 _30rw.cfs -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:57 _30rx.cfs -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30ry.cfs -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 3.8K Apr 7 10:58 _30rz.cfs -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 2.3K Apr 7 10:58 dovecot-expunges.log -rw--- 1 dluke dluke20B Apr 7 10:58 segments.gen -rw--- 1 dluke dluke 244B Apr 7 10:58 segments_6214 When running 2.2.27 this doesn't happen. -- Daniel J. Luke
Re: [Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
> On April 7, 2017 at 9:38 AM Timo Sirainenwrote: > > > On 7 Apr 2017, at 2.25, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > > > On Apr 6, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > >> Planning to release v2.2.29 on Monday. Please find and report any bugs > >> before that. > > > > I'm seeing still seeing the assert that started showing up for me with > > 2.2.28 (https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-February/107250.html) > > > > Below I generate it using doveadm with dovecot 2.2.29rc1 (output slightly > > cleaned up so the backtrace is easier to read) > > > > % sudo doveadm index -A \* > > doveadm(dluke): Panic: file mailbox-list.c: line 1159 > > (mailbox_list_try_mkdir_root): assertion failed: (strncmp(root_dir, path, > > strlen(root_dir)) == 0) > > This is with mbox? I thought this had been happening already a long time.. Or > if not mbox, what's your doveconf -n? for mbox and lucene, there is a workaround, which is to create directory under the INDEXES directory called lucene-indexes. This way the directory creation is not attempted, this is a known bug, but just hasn't been fixed yet. Aki
Re: [Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
On 7 Apr 2017, at 2.25, Daniel J. Lukewrote: > > On Apr 6, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> Planning to release v2.2.29 on Monday. Please find and report any bugs >> before that. > > I'm seeing still seeing the assert that started showing up for me with 2.2.28 > (https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-February/107250.html) > > Below I generate it using doveadm with dovecot 2.2.29rc1 (output slightly > cleaned up so the backtrace is easier to read) > > % sudo doveadm index -A \* > doveadm(dluke): Panic: file mailbox-list.c: line 1159 > (mailbox_list_try_mkdir_root): assertion failed: (strncmp(root_dir, path, > strlen(root_dir)) == 0) This is with mbox? I thought this had been happening already a long time.. Or if not mbox, what's your doveconf -n?
Re: [Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
On Apr 6, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Timo Sirainenwrote: > Planning to release v2.2.29 on Monday. Please find and report any bugs before > that. I'm seeing still seeing the assert that started showing up for me with 2.2.28 (https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-February/107250.html) Below I generate it using doveadm with dovecot 2.2.29rc1 (output slightly cleaned up so the backtrace is easier to read) % sudo doveadm index -A \* doveadm(dluke): Panic: file mailbox-list.c: line 1159 (mailbox_list_try_mkdir_root): assertion failed: (strncmp(root_dir, path, strlen(root_dir)) == 0) doveadm(dluke): Error: Raw backtrace: 2 libdovecot.0.dylib 0x00010cfed284 default_fatal_finish + 36 -> 3 libdovecot.0.dylib 0x00010cfed05d default_fatal_handler + 61 -> 4 libdovecot.0.dylib 0x00010cfed5a9 i_panic + 169 -> 5 libdovecot-storage.0.dylib 0x00010ce49677 mailbox_list_try_mkdir_root + 1207 -> 6 libdovecot-storage.0.dylib 0x00010ce49759 mailbox_list_mkdir_root + 25 -> 7 lib21_fts_lucene_plugin.so 0x00010ee6ab39 fts_backend_lucene_update_set_build_key + 73 -> 8 lib20_fts_plugin.so 0x00010d2017cf fts_backend_update_set_build_key + 79 -> 9 lib20_fts_plugin.so 0x00010d2027a7 fts_build_mail + 1479 -> 10 lib20_fts_plugin.so 0x00010d20795a fts_mail_precache + 794 -> 11 libdovecot-storage.0.dylib 0x00010ce2ff59 mail_precache + 25 -> 12 doveadm 0x00010cd319df cmd_index_run + 1007 -> 13 doveadm 0x00010cd2c0e5 doveadm_mail_next_user + 421 -> 14 doveadm 0x00010cd2d6f5 doveadm_mail_cmd_exec + 645 -> 15 doveadm 0x00010cd2d32d doveadm_cmd_ver2_to_mail_cmd_wrapper + 1629 -> 16 doveadm 0x00010cd3c696 doveadm_cmd_run_ver2 + 1046 -> 17 doveadm 0x00010cd3c257 doveadm_cmd_try_run_ver2 + 55 -> 18 doveadm 0x00010cd3ef79 main + 1001 -> 19 libdyld.dylib 0x7fff93655235 start + 1 Abort -- Daniel J. Luke
[Dovecot-news] v2.2.29.rc1 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.29.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.29.rc1.tar.gz.sig Planning to release v2.2.29 on Monday. Please find and report any bugs before that. * When Dovecot encounters an internal error, it logs the real error and usually logs another line saying what function failed. Previously the second log line's error message was a rather uninformative "Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information." Now the real error message is duplicated in this second log line. * lmtp: If a delivery has multiple recipients, run autoexpunging only for the last recipient. This avoids a problem where a long autoexpunge run causes LMTP client to timeout between the DATA replies, resulting in duplicate mail deliveries. * config: Don't stop the process due to idling. Otherwise the configuration is reloaded when the process restarts. * mail_log plugin: Differentiate autoexpunges from regular expunges * imapc: Use LOGOUT to cleanly disconnect from server. * lib-http: Internal status codes (>9000) are no longer visible in logs * director: Log vhost count changes and HOST-UP/DOWN + quota: Add plugin { quota_max_mail_size } setting to limit the maximum individual mail size that can be saved. + imapc: Add imapc_features=delay-login. If set, connecting to the remote IMAP server isn't done until it's necessary. + imapc: Add imapc_connection_retry_count and imapc_connection_retry_interval settings. + imap, pop3, indexer-worker: Add (deinit) to process title before autoexpunging runs. + Added %{encrypt} and %{decrypt} variables + imap/pop3 proxy: Log proxy state in errors as human-readable string. + imap/pop3-login: All forward_* extra fields returned by passdb are sent to the next hop when proxying using ID/XCLIENT commands. On the receiving side these fields are imported and sent to auth process where they're accessible via %{passdb:forward_*}. This is done only if the sending IP address matches login_trusted_networks. + imap-login: If imap_id_retain=yes, send the IMAP ID string to auth process. %{client_id} expands to it in auth process. The ID string is also sent to the next hop when proxying. - fts-tika: Fixed crash when parsing attachment without Content-Disposition header. Broken by 2.2.28. - trash plugin was broken in 2.2.28 - auth: When passdb/userdb lookups were done via auth-workers, too much data was added to auth cache. This could have resulted in wrong replies when using multiple passdbs/userdbs. - auth: passdb { skip & mechanisms } were ignored for the first passdb - oauth2: Various fixes, including fixes to crashes - dsync: Large Sieve scripts (or other large metadata) weren't always synced. - Index rebuild (e.g. doveadm force-resync) set all mails as \Recent - imap-hibernate: %{userdb:*} wasn't expanded in mail_log_prefix - doveadm: Exit codes weren't preserved when proxying commands via doveadm-server. Almost all errors used exit code 75 (tempfail). - ACLs weren't applied to not-yet-existing autocreated mailboxes. - Fixed a potential crash when parsing a broken message header. - cassandra: Fallback consistency settings weren't working correctly. - doveadm director status : "Initial config" was always empty - imapc: Various reconnection fixes. ___ Dovecot-news mailing list Dovecot-news@dovecot.org https://dovecot.org/mailman/listinfo/dovecot-news