Re: [ext] 2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?

2019-07-17 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot
> > All of the data is an /dev/sda1 > > What filesystem is this? ext4 > I did a bunch of testing, and after initially thinking I saw an > increase it was just due to bad testing because the new TCP_NODELAY > changes allowed imaptest to do more work. So I can't see that there is > any disk IO

Re: [ext] 2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?

2019-07-17 Thread Timo Sirainen via dovecot
On 16 Jul 2019, at 11.15, Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot wrote: > > * Timo Sirainen via dovecot : > >>> And alas, I had a look at the monitoring and found that disk IO has >>> increase A LOT after the update: >>> https://www.arschkrebs.de/images/dovecot-disk-io-increase.png >>> >>> I zoomed in

Re: [ext] 2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?

2019-07-16 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot
* Timo Sirainen via dovecot : > > And alas, I had a look at the monitoring and found that disk IO has > > increase A LOT after the update: > > https://www.arschkrebs.de/images/dovecot-disk-io-increase.png > > > > I zoomed in and found that the sudden increace in IO coincides with > > the update

Re: [ext] 2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?

2019-07-16 Thread Timo Sirainen via dovecot
On 15 Jul 2019, at 23.17, Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot wrote: > > * Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot : >> We're using dovecot (via LMTP) as a backup for all incoming mail. >> >> I upgraded from 2.3.6 to 2.3.7 on the 12th: >> 2019-07-12 14:35:44 upgrade dovecot-imapd:amd64 2:2.3.6-2~bionic >>

Re: [ext] 2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?

2019-07-15 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot
* Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot : > We're using dovecot (via LMTP) as a backup for all incoming mail. > > I upgraded from 2.3.6 to 2.3.7 on the 12th: > 2019-07-12 14:35:44 upgrade dovecot-imapd:amd64 2:2.3.6-2~bionic > 2:2.3.7-8~bionic > > and it seems that 2.3.7 is slower than 2.3.6 -- mail to