On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:52:14AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> I have tried, but failed,. To write a sieve and script to strip HTML parts of
> messages and if the message is only HTML to pipe it through w3m and add the
> html portion as an emo attachment (in case it has links that need clicking,
>
On 26/01/2021 18:18, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
If someone needs to send a formatted text, then they can use a text
editor on headed paper, export to PDF and send it as attachment. E-mail
proper is the plain text body of the message. When people send fancy
HTML and expect me to read it on my
If someone needs to send a formatted text, then they can use a text editor on
headed paper, export to PDF and send it as attachment. E-mail proper is the
plain text body of the message. When people send fancy HTML and expect me to
read it on my phone, then they have wasted their effort, because
On 2021-01-25, @lbutlr wrote:
> I get a LOT of mail that is pointlessly HTMLized (including on this list)
*especially* on this list, for some reason.
On 25 Jan 2021, at 02:08, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> It would be useful to automatically de-HTML e-mails, but this is not a task
> for dovecot. Even more useful would be to deprecate HTML in e-mails.
Well, that is never going to happen.
I have tried, but failed,. To write a sieve and script to
On 25/01/2021 09:08, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> It would be useful to automatically de-HTML e-mails, but this is not a
> task for dovecot. Even more useful would be to deprecate HTML in e-mails.
Why would it be useful to deprecate HTML in emails? Presumably you're
arguing for an alternative, more
It would be useful to automatically de-HTML e-mails, but this is not a task for
dovecot. Even more useful would be to deprecate HTML in e-mails.
Original Message
On Jan 20, 2021, 13:58, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2021, at 04:33, Piotr Auksztulewicz wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 20,
On 20 Jan 2021, at 07:20, Erwan David wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 01:58:38PM CET, "@lbutlr" said:
>> On 20 Jan 2021, at 04:33, Piotr Auksztulewicz wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:27:11AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
set imap_pass = "lasH-hds[er$asd" # Not a real password
>>>
>>> Use
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 01:58:38PM CET, "@lbutlr" said:
> On 20 Jan 2021, at 04:33, Piotr Auksztulewicz wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:27:11AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> >> set imap_pass = "lasH-hds[er$asd" # Not a real password
> >
> > Use single quotes around the password. Double quotes
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:58:38AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> Also… gr. Who though expansion inside a password string was a
> clever idea and can I introduce them to a clue bat? :p
Well, this is just the result of a generic config file parser, every
statement gets processed the same way. I guess
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 15:59, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2021, at 04:33, Piotr Auksztulewicz wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:27:11AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> >> set imap_pass = "lasH-hds[er$asd" # Not a real password
> >
> > Use single quotes around the password. Double quotes make $asd
On 20 Jan 2021, at 04:33, Piotr Auksztulewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:27:11AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
>> set imap_pass = "lasH-hds[er$asd" # Not a real password
>
> Use single quotes around the password. Double quotes make $asd to be
> interpreted as shell variable and replaced with
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:27:11AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> set imap_pass = "lasH-hds[er$asd" # Not a real password
Use single quotes around the password. Double quotes make $asd to be
interpreted as shell variable and replaced with (most likely) empty
string, so you get a shortened passwort in
> On 20/01/2021 13:27 @lbutlr wrote:
>
>
> I have a user who is unable to use mutt to login. I tested and sent a muttrc
> that worked for me and all he needed to do was put in his username and
> password.
>
> Which failed.
>
> After some back and forth, I figured out that his password
I have a user who is unable to use mutt to login. I tested and sent a muttrc
that worked for me and all he needed to do was put in his username and password.
Which failed.
After some back and forth, I figured out that his password contains a '$' and a
'[' in it, and it seems like one of, or
form a full index sync
> when the mtime of a Maildir's new/ has changed. I'm willing to take the
> performance hit, because it would fix a problem I'm having with using mutt
> and dovecot together. Can this be done in principle by adding a config option
> check like ctx->mbox->
e, and all my patch did was ruin the index ;)
So, to summarize my question: I'd like dovecot to perform a full index
sync when the mtime of a Maildir's new/ has changed. I'm willing to take
the performance hit, because it would fix a problem I'm having with
using mutt and dovecot together. Can thi
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:56:53AM +0100, Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net put
forth the proposition:
* David Woodfall d...@dawoodfall.net 2013.02.04 03:19:
It looks as if folder_format option of mutt
as only for local folders, and will not work for IMAP.
I was grasping at straws and hoping
* David Woodfall d...@dawoodfall.net 2013.02.04 03:19:
It looks as if folder_format option of mutt
as only for local folders, and will not work for IMAP.
I was grasping at straws and hoping someone here may know.
As mentioned this may be one for the mutt list. But it should work with IMAP:
Version 2.1.10
For some reason Mutt doesn't list any info about IMAP folders and
seems to ignore folder_format.
My questions is does anyone have any workarounds for this?
David Woodfall wrote:
Version 2.1.10
For some reason Mutt doesn't list any info about IMAP folders and
seems to ignore folder_format.
Doesn't have anything to with dovecot, does it?
It looks as if folder_format option of mutt
as only for local folders, and will not work for IMAP.
Regards
On 04/02/13 02:08, Daniel Parthey wrote:
David Woodfall wrote:
Version 2.1.10
For some reason Mutt doesn't list any info about IMAP folders and
seems to ignore folder_format.
Doesn't have anything to with dovecot, does it?
It looks as if folder_format option of mutt
as only for local
On 24.4.2012, at 19.07, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi, I'm a user of Mutt, and before moving to Thunderbird I'm trying to
share mboxes between them. To do this, I installed Dovecot to create an
IMAP server in my local machine, to serve mutt mboxes to be read by
Thunderbird.
So far, I can read
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On 24.4.2012, at 19.07, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi, I'm a user of Mutt, and before moving to Thunderbird I'm trying to
share mboxes between them. To do this, I installed Dovecot to create an
IMAP server in my local machine, to serve mutt mboxes to be read by
Hi, I'm a user of Mutt, and before moving to Thunderbird I'm trying to
share mboxes between them. To do this, I installed Dovecot to create an
IMAP server in my local machine, to serve mutt mboxes to be read by
Thunderbird.
So far, I can read my inbox from /var/mail/%u, but in mutt, I have many
25 matches
Mail list logo
