Hello, Axel.
You wrote 18 февраля 2010 г., 18:45:21:
> This is not a my-email-client-is-better-than-your-email-client thread,
> I just want to know which client(s) make proper use of imap features
> for fast searches/copies/deletions etc.
IMHO, all existing clients suck, but not only due to IMAP4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Lev,
On 2010-02-22 16:04, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>> This is not a my-email-client-is-better-than-your-email-client thread,
>> I just want to know which client(s) make proper use of imap features
>> for fast searches/copies/deletions etc.
> IMHO, a
Hello *,
I've a well functioning dovecot.1.2.10 installation. I'd like to migrate to
dovecot.2.0.beta. Is it possible to use one (big) dovecot.conf or must I
split it into pieces into directory conf.d? What is the best procedure
to convert the configuration file?
Any pointers welcome.
--Fra
Hello,
I couldn't find any recent informations regarding the status of
implementing replication to Dovecot. Especially master/master is what I
am waiting for.
Is it useable yet with 2.0 or, if not, any eta?
Thanks in advance,
Michael
On 19/02/2010 23:51, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Rodolfo Gonzalez put forth on 2/19/2010 5:18 PM:
Hi,
This might be a silly question: which would be
the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++
storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for
mkfs.ext4 calle
On 21/02/2010 19:33, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.2.2010, at 21.16, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
I have an Android Mail App which worked fine with IDLE pushes before (K-9 Mail)
under 1.2.10. With 2.0 beta 3 it seems to be looking for an IDLE prompt from
the server, otherwise it will disable connec
On 19/02/2010 21:40, Wayne Thursby wrote:
Thank you to everyone who has contributed to this thread, it has been
very educational.
Since my last post, I have had several meetings, including a conference
with Dell storage specialists. I have also gathered some metrics to beat
around.
The EqualLog
Hi
HA, Consolidated Backup, and a couple of other technologies are what really
make this an enterprise solution, providing near 24x7x365 uptime and rapid
redeployment of an infrastructure after catastrophic loss of the datacenter.
Can you tell me exactly what "Consolidated Backup" means
I use GlusterFS with Dovecot and it works without issues. The GlusterFS team
has made huge progress since 2.0 and with the new 3.0 version they have again
proved that GlusterFS can get better.
You have kindly shared some details of your config before - care to
update us on what you are
Ed W put forth on 2/22/2010 7:03 AM:
> Can you tell me exactly what "Consolidated Backup" means with respect to
> ESX please? From the brief description on the website I'm not quite
> sure how it varies to say backing up the raw storage using some kind of
> snapshot method?
Here's a decent write
Hello,
In case my nasty changes are right, here comes the patch (including
Makefile.in & Makefile.am ... I'm not really good with automake/autoconf)
I've applied to dovecot 1.2.10 (from Debian backport repository for Lenny,
source package version 1:1.2.10-1~bpo50+1, expecting my changes won't be
d
Hi all,
Is there how to make the finger command retrieve mail count from maildir?
Thanks and best regards.
--
Marcio Merlone
<>
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 11:59 +, Ed W wrote:
> > Hmm. That's too bad. I was hoping to avoid sending any unnecessary
> > capabilities before login. Perhaps IDLE could be added there as an
> > exception.
> >
> From memory Outlook Express/Windows Mail requests capabilities before
> login (and ne
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 10:15 +0100, dove...@lechtermann.net wrote:
> I couldn't find any recent informations regarding the status of
> implementing replication to Dovecot. Especially master/master is what I
> am waiting for.
>
> Is it useable yet with 2.0 or, if not, any eta?
The idea is currentl
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 07:26 +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Am 21.02.2010 um 07:16 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>
> > Yes, that's intentional. imaps isn't a protocol.
>
> Thanks Timo. Has the specific logging option for the LDA been dropped? I see
> it logging to 'info_log_path=' only.
What specific l
I am testing the version on FreeBSD 7.3-PRELEASE (I doubt it's the issue)
and I am having a problem with pop3. Here is what I see in the log when I
attempt to connect to port 110:
Feb 22 18:15:03 master: Warning: SIGHUP received - reloading configuration
Feb 22 18:15:08 pop3-login: Panic: file log
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 13:56 +0100, Toorop wrote:
> password(too...@domain.tld,82.245.64.126): Generating CRAM-MD5 from user
> 'too...@domain.tld@', password ''
The @ thing is .. well, probably a bug, but it doesn't matter in this
case anyway. The problem is that password is empty. It's because
v
Hello,
while reading config options for dovecot v1.2.10 I've noticed a very
small bug:
# ./configure --help | egrep -- 'Dovecot|--with-gnu-ld'
`configure' configures Dovecot 1.2.10 to adapt to many kinds of systems.
--with-gnu-ld assume the C compiler uses GNU ld [default=no]
--wit
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>I am testing the version on FreeBSD 7.3-PRELEASE (I doubt it's the issue)
>and I am having a problem with pop3. Here is what I see in the log when I
>attempt to connect to port 110:
>
>Feb 22 18:15:03 master: Warning: SIGHUP received - reloading configuration
>Feb 22 18
On 2010-02-22 10:30 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> And the output of doveconf can be seen at http://62.8.64.102/~wash/2.0b3.txt
Please don't do that, just paste them inline...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-02-22 10:30 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > And the output of doveconf can be seen at
> http://62.8.64.102/~wash/2.0b3.txt
>
> Please don't do that, just paste them inline...
>
Sorry. Here goes..
# 2.0.beta3: /opt/dovecot2/etc/
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 18:30 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> Feb 22 18:15:08 pop3-login: Panic: file login-settings.c: line 216
> (login_settings_read): assertion failed: (input.roots[count] == NULL)
Looks like beta3 was a pretty horrible release. Fixed this bug too:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovec
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 16:36 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> while reading config options for dovecot v1.2.10 I've noticed a very
> small bug:
>
> # ./configure --help | egrep -- 'Dovecot|--with-gnu-ld'
> `configure' configures Dovecot 1.2.10 to adapt to many kinds of systems.
> --with-gnu
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 18:30 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>> Feb 22 18:15:08 pop3-login: Panic: file login-settings.c: line 216
>> (login_settings_read): assertion failed: (input.roots[count] =3D=3D NULL)
>
>Looks like beta3 was a pretty horrible release. Fixed this bug
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 18:30 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > Feb 22 18:15:08 pop3-login: Panic: file login-settings.c: line 216
> > (login_settings_read): assertion failed: (input.roots[count] == NULL)
>
> Looks like beta3 was a pretty
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 19:32 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> Now it starts normally, at least, but funnily, the auth mechanisms I am
> using in beta1 don't work with the same db in beta3. Unless I missed
> something, the following is what I get:
>
> Feb 22 19:29:48 auth: Error: md5_verify(u...@
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:46 +0100, Frank Elsner wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> I've a well functioning dovecot.1.2.10 installation. I'd like to migrate to
> dovecot.2.0.beta. Is it possible to use one (big) dovecot.conf or must I
> split it into pieces into directory conf.d?
You can keep using a single
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 20:02 +0100, e-frog wrote:
> I'm playing around with the new Dovecot v2.0.beta3 and don't seem to be
> able to get quotas working from userdb. I didn't change the SQL query
> which was working for 1.2.10.
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/ba19f3c077a8
Looks like
Symptons are the ones we described earlier but It was not working on
1.2.10 for me until I set quota_rule on password_query.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 20:02 +0100, e-frog wrote:
>
>> I'm playing around with the new Dovecot v2.0.beta3 and don't s
I guess you mean you added userdb_quota_rule on password_query, because you
were using userdb prefetch.
On 22.2.2010, at 19.19, aledr wrote:
> Symptons are the ones we described earlier but It was not working on
> 1.2.10 for me until I set quota_rule on password_query.
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010
On Feb 19, 2010, at 9:23 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 15:28 -0600, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
>> pop3-login[24451]: segfault at 000c rip 003c7de610a2 rsp
>> 7fff07116968 error 4
>>
>> I'm having a really hard time getting a core dump
>
> Yeah, it's difficult to
Am 22.02.2010 um 16:29 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> What specific logging option for LDA?.. Seems to work exactly the same
> as in v1.2:
>
> protocol lda {
> info_log_path = /tmp/deliver.log
> }
Ah ok. Thought all logging ought to be configured in 'logging.conf' as there
was no example in 'lda.conf
On 22.2.2010, at 19.49, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Am 22.02.2010 um 16:29 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> What specific logging option for LDA?.. Seems to work exactly the same
>> as in v1.2:
>>
>> protocol lda {
>> info_log_path = /tmp/deliver.log
>> }
>
> Ah ok. Thought all logging ought to be configur
Am 22.02.2010 um 18:53 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> Since I switched to lmtp delivery yesterday, would it also be possible to
>> have a different logging path for that?
>
> Nope. It would be now much simpler to implement it though. log daemon would
> just need to support reading/using separate con
On 22.2.2010, at 19.49, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
>> gdb -p `pidof imap-login`
>> cont
>>
>> bt full
>
> Tim, Thanks for the feedback. In the other email you sent about re-producing
> with nessus, note that we're using the checkpassword system, however from
> strace info so far we think the error ha
On 22.2.2010, at 19.53, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Nope. It would be now much simpler to implement it though. log daemon would
> just need to support reading/using separate config for each service. Maybe it
> could even be implemented in less than 50 lines of code..
Oh, actually not. The difficult
Am 22.02.2010 um 18:59 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> Oh, actually not. The difficult part is that Dovecot just doesn't support
> logging to multiple files (with same severity) in a same process. The logging
> code would have to be abstracted out before that would be possible.
Actually I like the ide
So if i understand this fully, you must define ALL potentional aliases
which user is member of ?
When create new alias ali...@domain.tld and it is alias for
u...@domain.tld i must edit vacation script and add :address
"ali...@domain.tld" ? If yes, is little stupid and unmaintainable. Can
be used s
On 22.2.2010, at 20.19, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Am 22.02.2010 um 18:59 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>
>> Oh, actually not. The difficult part is that Dovecot just doesn't support
>> logging to multiple files (with same severity) in a same process. The
>> logging code would have to be abstracted out b
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
password(too...@domain.tld,82.245.64.126): Generating CRAM-MD5 from user
'too...@domain.tld@', password ''
The @ thing is .. well, probably a bug, but it doesn't matter in this
case anyway. The problem is that password is empty. It's because
vpopmail didn't return a p
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 20:02 +0100, e-frog wrote:
>
>> I'm playing around with the new Dovecot v2.0.beta3 and don't seem to be
>> able to get quotas working from userdb. I didn't change the SQL query
>> which was working for 1.2.10.
>
> Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2
is there a plugin or some other method by which i could have a user
ONLY have access to subscribed folders? having a separate login or
a separate instance of dovecot is ok if necessary.
the iPhone always shows ALL folders, not just subscribed ones. i'd
like to be able to see only the subscribed
From memory Outlook Express/Windows Mail requests capabilities before
login (and never after login)?
I don't know about them, but I remember someone told me Outlook was
fine. The point anyway is that clients don't have to request anything,
the capability is pushed to them. There are tw
On Feb 22, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> Well, that's coming from Kerberos library, which is called by OpenSSL for
> some reason.. Are you using Kerberos? Anyway it looks to me more like OpenSSL
> or Kerberos bug.
Tim,
Below is the stack trace with symbols. The bug appears to
Hello,
dovecot-1.2.10
dovecot-sieve-0.1.14
dovecot-managesieve-0.11.11
I believe I patched dovecot successfully and compiled the dovecot and
dovecot-sieve source tress.
patching file README.managesieve
patching file dovecot-example.conf
patching file src/master/child-process.c
patching file
> Timo Sirainen wrote in another thread:
>>
>>Looks like beta3 was a pretty horrible release. Fixed this bug too:
>>http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/32d6dd7ce7cb
That solved my pop3 assertion panic. Once I got past that, I again tried
changing from
ssl_cert = /etc/postfix/sbh16-cert.pem
ssl
Saw the following in the log after shutting down my client.
Feb 22 20:44:47 sbh16 dovecot: imap(mark): Disconnected: Logged out
bytes=1755/9765
Feb 22 20:44:47 sbh16 dovecot: imap(mark): Panic: file
istream-raw-mbox.c: line503 (istream_raw_mbox_get_start_offset):
assertion failed: (rstream->seeke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Frank Cusack wrote:
having a separate login or
is ok if necessary.
This is more or less "share via symlink":
http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Symlinks
Then have a daily cron job or postlogin script to setup the symlink
48 matches
Mail list logo
