Re: dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?

> On 20 Nov 2017, at 10.50, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > AFAIK no complex director stuff would be needed then, right? > The second sentence implies that using file locking should also be enough, > which dovecot does. You are building such a complex system and then

Re: dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 21:40:55 +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 7 Nov 2017, at 21.33, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > > > > Me again have to stress that our former implementation of the lda process > > did do exactly nothing to all the dovecot files, and

Re: doveadm mailbox list -s Segmentation fault

Can you provide subscriptions file for the user as well? Aki On 20.11.2017 10:37, Kristjan Eentsalu wrote: > Sorry, forgot to include it first time. bt full down below > > (gdb) bt full > #0 0x000800d77e04 in mailbox_tree_traverse (tree=0x0, path=0x801c1a540 > "INBOX", create=false,

Re: doveadm mailbox list -s Segmentation fault

Hey, Here is subscribiton file INBOX/INBOX INBOX/Archives INBOX/Archives/2014 INBOX/Archives/2015 INBOX/Archives/2016 INBOX/Calendar INBOX/Drafts INBOX/Sent INBOX/Spam INBOX/Trash INBOX/Trash/eee INBOX/alerts INBOX/dos INBOX/itmailid INBOX/kolab INBOX/mon INBOX/tahtis INBOX/test INBOX/testiala

Re: doveadm mailbox list -s Segmentation fault

can you please send bt full output? Aki On 20.11.2017 10:30, Kristjan Eentsalu wrote: > Hey, > > I'm getting Segmentation fault when doing "doveadm mailbox list -s -u > kristjan.eentsalu". > doveadm mailbox list -u kristjan.eentsalu works fine. > > OS: FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p1 > Dovecot 2.2.33.2

doveadm mailbox list -s Segmentation fault

Hey, I'm getting Segmentation fault when doing "doveadm mailbox list -s -u kristjan.eentsalu". doveadm mailbox list -u kristjan.eentsalu works fine. OS: FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p1 Dovecot 2.2.33.2 , pigenhole 0.4.21 Trace and dovecot -n below GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software

Re: doveadm mailbox list -s Segmentation fault

Sorry, forgot to include it first time. bt full down below (gdb) bt full #0 0x000800d77e04 in mailbox_tree_traverse (tree=0x0, path=0x801c1a540 "INBOX", create=false, created_r=0x7fffe4f7) at mailbox-tree.c:103 node = (struct mailbox_node **) 0x10 parent = (struct

Doveadm backup error.

Hello. I try to migrate dovecot 1 to dovecot 2 with doveadm backup. But when i try to set doveadm backup i get : mx3:/root/dsync@[23:11] # doveadm -v -c ah.temp backup -R -u a...@test.pl imapc: doveadm(a...@test.pl ): Error: Mail access for users with UID 145 not

Errors installing on Ubuntu 17.04

I've been struggling with this on and off for a while now. Upon attempting to install Dovecot on Ubuntu 17.04 I get the following errors Selecting previously unselected package dovecot-imapd. (Reading database ... 243684 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack

Re: Errors installing on Ubuntu 17.04

On 11/20/17 1:58 PM, Someone wrote: I've been struggling with this on and off for a while now. Upon attempting to install Dovecot on Ubuntu 17.04 I get the following errors Selecting previously unselected package dovecot-imapd. (Reading database ... 243684 files and directories currently

Re: home folder for virtual users with autoexpunge setting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, fe...@kngnt.org wrote: I understand this is correct: as is a virtual user, it does not have home folder. Is there any way I can set the autoexpunge plugin to store the lock file in the virtual user email home folder? well,

Re: home folder for virtual users with autoexpunge setting

On 19.11.2017 10:57, fe...@kngnt.org wrote: > Hi all, > > I have enabled today the autoexpunge setting for Trash folders, and I am > getting the following error when Dovecot starts: > > imap(): Error: autoexpunge: Couldn't create dovecot.autoexpunge.lock > lock: User has no home directory >

Re: LMTP "Relative home directory paths not supported"

On 11/20/17 6:33 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 20.11.2017 16:20, Jeff Kletsky wrote: On 11/20/17 6:15 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 20.11.2017 16:12, Jeff Kletsky wrote: I'm in the process of moving from LDA to LMTP (Postfix upstream) prior to a transition off `nix accounts to virtual accounts and am

Re: dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:05:46 +0200 Sami Ketola wrote: > > On 20 Nov 2017, at 10.50, Stephan von Krawczynski > > wrote: > > > > AFAIK no complex director stuff would be needed then, right? > > The second sentence implies that using file locking

Re: dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?

> On 20 Nov 2017, at 12.54, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > If I had lets say 10 nodes handling incoming SMTP and delivery to local > maildirs in parallel and independantly on a network storage and imapping this > from another independant 4 nodes, then building a not

Re: LMTP "Relative home directory paths not supported"

On 20.11.2017 16:12, Jeff Kletsky wrote: > I'm in the process of moving from LDA to LMTP (Postfix upstream) prior > to a transition off `nix accounts to virtual accounts and am stumped > by LMTP reporting > >     dovecot: lmtp(10019, j...@example.com): Error: Relative home > directory paths not

Re: LMTP "Relative home directory paths not supported"

On 11/20/17 6:15 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 20.11.2017 16:12, Jeff Kletsky wrote: I'm in the process of moving from LDA to LMTP (Postfix upstream) prior to a transition off `nix accounts to virtual accounts and am stumped by LMTP reporting     dovecot: lmtp(10019, j...@example.com): Error:

LMTP "Relative home directory paths not supported"

I'm in the process of moving from LDA to LMTP (Postfix upstream) prior to a transition off `nix accounts to virtual accounts and am stumped by LMTP reporting     dovecot: lmtp(10019, j...@example.com): Error: Relative home directory paths not supported: 0 LDA does /not /have any problems