Re: Filesystem level backups?

2018-04-09 Thread Steve Atkins
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 5:34 AM, Marc Stürmer wrote: > > Am 2018-04-09 00:55, schrieb Steve Atkins: > >> Will a simple backup of all the files of an multi-dbox give me a >> consistent state when I recover, or do I need to do something (e.g. >> lock writes to the mailbox)

Re: Filesystem level backups?

2018-04-09 Thread Ivan Warren
Le 4/9/2018 à 4:56 PM, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet a écrit : Hello all, Does doveadm backup - backup the attachments as well when using SIS ? As far as I know, it does (it de-shares shared attachments) I've used that solution to stop using SIS at one point (it created more problems than

SIS and Filesystem level backups (was just Re: Filesystem level backups?)

2018-04-09 Thread Tanstaafl
On 4/9/2018, 11:34:40 AM, Ivan Warren wrote: > Le 4/9/2018 à 4:56 PM, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet a écrit : >> Does doveadm backup backup the attachments as well when using SIS? > As far as I know, it does (it de-shares shared attachments) > > I've used that solution to

RE: Re: Filesystem level backups?

2018-04-09 Thread DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet
Hello all, Does doveadm backup - backup the attachments as well when using SIS ? Regards Durga Prasad +919849111010 -Original Message- From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Marc Stürmer Sent: 09 April 2018 18:05 To: Steve Atkins Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject:

Re: Filesystem level backups?

2018-04-09 Thread Ivan Warren
Le 4/9/2018 à 2:34 PM, Marc Stürmer a écrit : Am 2018-04-09 00:55, schrieb Steve Atkins: Will a simple backup of all the files of an multi-dbox give me a consistent state when I recover, or do I need to do something (e.g. lock writes to the mailbox) while I run a backup? If you are doing

Re: lda fails in parse_angle_addr if sieve is enabled

2018-04-09 Thread Bernard Spil
Hi all, This patch doesn't fix the issue. Error persists. https://github.com/stephanbosch/dovecot-core/commit/6553f20bb31b5f0eebb73a0db526f00816b47d71 Cheers, Bernard. 2018-04-08 21:26 GMT+02:00 Bernard Spil : > Hi all, > > Reverted back to 2.2.34 and pigeonhole 0.4.22 and

Re: IMAP_ID_LOG

2018-04-09 Thread Michael Slusarz
ID is an IMAP specific protocol command (RFC 2971). There is no POP or SMTP equivalent. > On April 9, 2018 at 10:19 AM "j.emerlik" wrote: > > Hi, > there in configuration is possibile to set imap_id_log for logging Client > ID e.g.: ID sent: name=Thunderbird,

Re: IMAP_ID_LOG

2018-04-09 Thread j.emerlik
SMTP lets you know the user agent, I thought that pop3 also. 2018-04-09 22:15 GMT+02:00 Michael Slusarz : > ID is an IMAP specific protocol command (RFC 2971). There is no POP or > SMTP equivalent. > > > On April 9, 2018 at 10:19 AM "j.emerlik"

Re: IMAP_ID_LOG

2018-04-09 Thread Joseph Tam
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, j.emerlik wrote: SMTP lets you know the user agent, I thought that pop3 also. SMTP does not, at least, it's not part of the protocol. The User-Agent is a header optinally inserted by mail clients within the message. IMAP ID is an extension of the IMAP protocol

Re: lda fails in parse_angle_addr if sieve is enabled

2018-04-09 Thread Stephan Bosch
Op 4/8/2018 om 8:10 PM schreef Bernard Spil: > Hi, > > Since updating to 2.3.1 on my FreeBSD mailserver mail delivery using > lda is broken if I have sieve enabled. > (Before updating this was 2.2 and pigeonhole 0.4) > > FreeBSD 11.1-p8 amd64 > Dovecot 2.3.1 > Pigeonhole 0.5.1 > > Mailflow is

Re: lda fails in parse_angle_addr if sieve is enabled

2018-04-09 Thread Stephan Bosch
Op 4/8/2018 om 8:10 PM schreef Bernard Spil: > Hi, > > Since updating to 2.3.1 on my FreeBSD mailserver mail delivery using > lda is broken if I have sieve enabled. > (Before updating this was 2.2 and pigeonhole 0.4) > > FreeBSD 11.1-p8 amd64 > Dovecot 2.3.1 > Pigeonhole 0.5.1 > > Mailflow is

IMAP_ID_LOG

2018-04-09 Thread j.emerlik
Hi, there in configuration is possibile to set imap_id_log for logging Client ID e.g.: ID sent: name=Thunderbird, version=52.7.0. Is possible to set same but for POP3 or SMTP Auth ? Ideally, it would be possible to log in to the database e.g. using postlogin script. Regards, MattX

Re: Filesystem level backups?

2018-04-09 Thread chaouche yacine
Been rsyncing my whole /var/vmail subdir (virtual users) for a while. So far so good. Yassine. On Sunday, April 8, 2018, 11:56:29 PM GMT+1, Steve Atkins wrote: Up until now I've been backing up my IMAP server by taking an atomic snapshot of the entire VM, so I've

Re: Filesystem level backups?

2018-04-09 Thread Marc Stürmer
Am 2018-04-09 00:55, schrieb Steve Atkins: Will a simple backup of all the files of an multi-dbox give me a consistent state when I recover, or do I need to do something (e.g. lock writes to the mailbox) while I run a backup? If you are doing this backup with a fully operational mail storage:

Re: Filesystem level backups?

2018-04-09 Thread chaouche yacine
Ah, I didn't know there was a diff. b/w maildir and mdbox in terms of storage. I should have mentionned I am using Maildir. Yassine. On Monday, April 9, 2018, 1:35:15 PM GMT+1, Marc Stürmer wrote: Am 2018-04-09 00:55, schrieb Steve Atkins: > Will a simple