Re: SIS and Filesystem level backups (was just Re: Filesystem level backups?)

[Tanstaafl]

Bummer, apparently things haven't changed (for the better) with respct
to backup sand SIS...

:(

On 4/9/2018, 12:28:31 PM, Tanstaafl  wrote:
> On 4/9/2018, 11:34:40 AM, Ivan Warren  wrote:
>> Le 4/9/2018 à 4:56 PM, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet a écrit :
>>> Does doveadm backup backup the attachments as well when using SIS? 
> 
>> As far as I know, it does (it de-shares shared attachments)
>>
>> I've used that solution to stop using SIS at one point (it created
>> more problems than it solved - especially permission issues)
> 
> Hi Ivan,
> 
> Mind if I ask for details?
> 
> (and maybe Aki or Timo):
> 
> I was considering implementing SIS on a new server I'm planning (won't
> be for a few months now probably). I had decided against it a long time
> ago because it was new, and there were drawbacks (backups not being
> properly accounted for being one of the big ones). I was hoping it had
> matured a lot since then and the drawbacks at the time were mostly
> history. Maybe that is not the case?
> 
> If not, are there open bugs dealing with the issues, and plan for
> addressing them? Or is SIs just probably not ever going to be ready for
> prime time?
> 

RE: SIS and Filesystem level backups (was just Re: Filesystem level backups?)

[DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet]

Hi all,
I am deeply interested in this topic considering that SAN level snapshots are 
not possible.
How do we effectively backup and restore SIS enable mdboxes?

Regards
Durga Prasad
+919849111010


-Original Message-
From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Tanstaafl
Sent: 09 April 2018 21:59
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: SIS and Filesystem level backups (was just Re: Filesystem level 
backups?)

On 4/9/2018, 11:34:40 AM, Ivan Warren <i...@vmfacility.fr> wrote:
> Le 4/9/2018 à 4:56 PM, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet a écrit :
>> Does doveadm backup backup the attachments as well when using SIS?

> As far as I know, it does (it de-shares shared attachments)
>
> I've used that solution to stop using SIS at one point (it created
> more problems than it solved - especially permission issues)

Hi Ivan,

Mind if I ask for details?

(and maybe Aki or Timo):

I was considering implementing SIS on a new server I'm planning (won't be for a 
few months now probably). I had decided against it a long time ago because it 
was new, and there were drawbacks (backups not being properly accounted for 
being one of the big ones). I was hoping it had matured a lot since then and 
the drawbacks at the time were mostly history. Maybe that is not the case?

If not, are there open bugs dealing with the issues, and plan for addressing 
them? Or is SIs just probably not ever going to be ready for prime time?


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus