Re: [Dovecot] got too little data ?? [SOLVED]
Benoit Branciard a écrit : I just switched in a hurry one of our mailbox servers from UW-imapd to Dovecot in an attempt to address performance and stability problems. [...] The bad new is that we get lots or errors like this in log: IMAP(username): FETCH for mailbox INBOX UID 23862 got too little data: 3186 vs 3206 We are running 1.0.9 (which includes Timo's patch) for about one day without the bug showing up anymore. So the fix seems OK. I believe Dovecot is the only software for which bugs are fixed in less time I need to complete the bug report :-) -- Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de suspect n'a ete trouve.
Re: [Dovecot] got too little data ??
On 11.12.2007, at 19.54, Benoit Branciard wrote: IMAP(username): FETCH for mailbox INBOX UID 23862 got too little data: 3186 vs 3206 Wonder why this started happening only now. I heard first about this last saturday, and now you.. Looks like I can reproduce this myself with stress testing as well. I don't remember seeing it before though. I'll see if I can get it fixed soon. PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] got too little data ??
For God's sake, Timo, cut us adrift for a week and study for your exams. You warned us; exercise some self-preservation. The community should understand that it has to fend for itself for awhile.and not make big changes on production systems Timo Sirainen wrote: On 11.12.2007, at 19.54, Benoit Branciard wrote: IMAP(username): FETCH for mailbox INBOX UID 23862 got too little data: 3186 vs 3206 Wonder why this started happening only now. I heard first about this last saturday, and now you.. Looks like I can reproduce this myself with stress testing as well. I don't remember seeing it before though. I'll see if I can get it fixed soon.
Re: [Dovecot] got too little data ??
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 20:03 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 11.12.2007, at 19.54, Benoit Branciard wrote: IMAP(username): FETCH for mailbox INBOX UID 23862 got too little data: 3186 vs 3206 Wonder why this started happening only now. I heard first about this last saturday, and now you.. Looks like I can reproduce this myself with stress testing as well. I don't remember seeing it before though. I'll see if I can get it fixed soon. Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/7c83c2d9c378 I guess I'll do 1.0.9 release as well. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] got too little data ??
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 20:37 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 20:03 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 11.12.2007, at 19.54, Benoit Branciard wrote: IMAP(username): FETCH for mailbox INBOX UID 23862 got too little data: 3186 vs 3206 Wonder why this started happening only now. I heard first about this last saturday, and now you.. Looks like I can reproduce this myself with stress testing as well. I don't remember seeing it before though. I'll see if I can get it fixed soon. Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/7c83c2d9c378 And http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/2f4242afee68 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] got too little data ??
No kidding. I went out and snow blowed the driveway and before I came back, the bug existed, you said what I was thinking, and Timo had a patch for it. If he doesn't have a commanding job prior to graduation I'll be flabbergasted. Blow me down. It's even on the web page already. Stewart Dean wrote: For God's sake, Timo, cut us adrift for a week and study for your exams. You warned us; exercise some self-preservation. The community should understand that it has to fend for itself for awhile.and not make big changes on production systems Timo Sirainen wrote: On 11.12.2007, at 19.54, Benoit Branciard wrote: IMAP(username): FETCH for mailbox INBOX UID 23862 got too little data: 3186 vs 3206 Wonder why this started happening only now. I heard first about this last saturday, and now you.. Looks like I can reproduce this myself with stress testing as well. I don't remember seeing it before though. I'll see if I can get it fixed soon.
