Re: [Doxygen-users] bug: missing descriptions in generated DoxyDocs.pm

2012-07-14 Thread Dimitri Van Heesch
On Jul 12, 2012, at 20:24 , Ron Wilson wrote: > On 7/12/12, Dimitri Van Heesch wrote: >> >> The problem is that @pre starts a new section (similar to @param) so this >> does >> not render nicely when used inside a parameter's documentation. > > What about handling parameters as if they were va

Re: [Doxygen-users] bug: missing descriptions in generated DoxyDocs.pm

2012-07-12 Thread Ron Wilson
I realized you replied to my other thread in this thread: On 7/12/12, Dimitri Van Heesch wrote: > > The problem is that @pre starts a new section (similar to @param) so this > does > not render nicely when used inside a parameter's documentation That was for "bug in formatting". On this thread,

Re: [Doxygen-users] bug: missing descriptions in generated DoxyDocs.pm

2012-07-12 Thread Ron Wilson
On 7/12/12, Dimitri Van Heesch wrote: > > The problem is that @pre starts a new section (similar to @param) so this > does > not render nicely when used inside a parameter's documentation. What about handling parameters as if they were variables? @pre renders decently for variables. Alternately,

Re: [Doxygen-users] bug: missing descriptions in generated DoxyDocs.pm

2012-07-12 Thread Michael.Broida
:25 PM To: Ron Wilson Cc: Broida, Michael; doxygen-users Subject: Re: [Doxygen-users] bug: missing descriptions in generated DoxyDocs.pm Hi Ron, On Jul 12, 2012, at 19:08 , Ron Wilson wrote: > On 7/12/12, michael.bro...@thomsonreuters.com > wrote: >> I thought the "doc follo

Re: [Doxygen-users] bug: missing descriptions in generated DoxyDocs.pm

2012-07-12 Thread Dimitri Van Heesch
Hi Ron, On Jul 12, 2012, at 19:08 , Ron Wilson wrote: > On 7/12/12, michael.bro...@thomsonreuters.com > wrote: >> I thought the "doc follows item" format was //< not ///< >> >> Does the three-slash variety work for you elsewhere? > > One of the examples in the "Documenting the Code" page

Re: [Doxygen-users] bug: missing descriptions in generated DoxyDocs.pm

2012-07-12 Thread Ron Wilson
On 7/12/12, michael.bro...@thomsonreuters.com wrote: > I thought the "doc follows item" format was //< not ///< > > Does the three-slash variety work for you elsewhere? One of the examples in the "Documenting the Code" page is: int var; ///< Brief description after the member

Re: [Doxygen-users] bug: missing descriptions in generated DoxyDocs.pm

2012-07-12 Thread Michael.Broida
I thought the "doc follows item" format was //< not ///< Does the three-slash variety work for you elsewhere? -Original Message- From: Ron Wilson [mailto:ronw.m...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:45 AM To: doxygen-users Subject: [Doxygen-use

[Doxygen-users] bug: missing descriptions in generated DoxyDocs.pm

2012-07-12 Thread Ron Wilson
Using ver 1.8.1.1 under Windows 7 Pro With the following function declaration, the parameter brief and detailed were not in DoxyDocs.pm /** * Basic test harness function. Set inputs and read outputs of * the function under test. * * @return TRUE if successful. */ int Test( UINT8 InVa