Re: [m_list_b] [DQSD-Users] RE: Clock updating bug

2003-08-14 Thread Alec Burgess
Tom Corcoran To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 06:03 Subject: [m_list_b] [DQSD-Users] RE: Clock updating bug Thanks Shawn,   >Maybe. There's really no telling. It could be working correctly, and>the jscript parser might have incorrectly

[DQSD-Users] RE: Clock updating bug

2003-08-14 Thread Tom Corcoran
Thanks Shawn,   >Maybe. There's really no telling. It could be working correctly, and>the jscript parser might have incorrectly parsed the>"clockupdate=1000;" line in your prefs file. Try deleting the line and>retyping the characters explicitly, just to make sure they're accurate.   Unfortun

[DQSD-Users] RE: Clock updating bug

2003-08-10 Thread Tom Corcoran
Hey Alec,   Great eye, thank you man :-)   > From: "Alec Burgess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> I've got no idea about the details of what you're trying, but I'll bet => the ":08" means August:-)> Somewhere you've probably got a date_time spec that says HH:MM that => should be HH:mm or vice-versa.> Re

RE: [DQSD-Users] RE: Clock updating bug

2003-08-02 Thread Shawn K. Hall
Hi Tom, > Thanks for the post Shawn. I tried this and my > system ground to a halt the cpu being totally > tied up with the updating I guess. Which sounds > like XP is not treating it incorrectly? Maybe. There's really no telling. It could be working correctly, and the jscript parser might have i

[DQSD-Users] RE: Clock updating bug

2003-08-02 Thread Tom Corcoran
> From: "Shawn K. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > I have reported the problem with my clock not updating> > before but have never got it resolved.> > clockupdate=1000;> > IIRC this is due to XP treating the milliseconds (1000 = 1 second)> incorrectly as seconds (1000 = 16 minutes, 40 seconds).