Perhaps this would help;
In BuildRunner.cs, selecting the temp build directory and retrieving the
source code is the reponsibility of GetSource() as below.
private string GetSource() {
string temp = Path.GetTempFileName();
File.Delete(temp);
Mark, it seems there is an issue with the output produced from VSS in the
History/Update list. If a file is added or removed, it is difficult to
ascertain where the file was added or removed to. You get a project name, but its not
a full path like an update, that looks like this:
Update file
Thanks for that Graeme. Looks like an interesting tool
Graeme Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SourceGear.
http://www.sourcegear.com/vault/
http://www.aspnetpro.com/productreviews/2003/04/asp200304jg_p/asp200304jg_p.
asp
Graeme Humphrey
Chive Software Limited
mailto: [EMAIL
Hi,
The system I am working on involves a web solution. We set Draco up a good 10 months
ago and had everything working. Unfortunately the build server
died recently. Now we have set up the new Draco server, we cannot get a successful
build. We have created a Virtual Directory underneath
Thanks Vincent. We have had this working in the past without using the latest version
of NAnt. However upgrading to the latest could be a solution.
Nick.
Vincent Labatut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i don't have this problem because i'm not using devenv.com to compile my
projects, but the
The other solution, Nick, is to open up your .csproj file and replace
Web with Local for the project type. It will continue to build
correctly, but you will need to manually enable ASP.NET debugging and
enter the local URL for the project as the page to launch.
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 07:05, Nick
Greetings, all:
Let me say that I think this a very good idea; I've hacked on the Draco
source* to get this same functionality, albeit hardwired and
site-specific. As part of our continuous build process, we run our unit
tests, which generate reports and dump them to a web server for later
Greetings, all:
In addition to being able to specify a persistent working copy for SCC
checkouts, I'd also like to see an absolute polling option (in addition
to the existing relative behaviour). I mentioned in a previous message
that we prefer incremental builds for their speed. Well, that's
