I find the 2B a better receiver, though both are darned good. I think the filters in the 2B and the passband tuning put it ahead of the 2C. Both are very stable, capable receivers however and if I was going to run one with a 2NT, I'd pair it with the 2C.
Regardless, you're going to enjoy it! John K5MO At 10:01 AM 11/10/04 -0600, Brad Pioveson W9FX wrote: > > >"Brad Pioveson W9FX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >I currently own (but, sadly have had little time to use) a Drake 2B. I have >now been offered a 2C for a reasonable price, and, since I have just sent a >check away for a 2NT, I am curious about it's matching receiver. How does >the 2C stack up against the 2B? It seems that I've read, somewhere, that >the 2B is an overall better rig. Thoughts? Opinions? > >73 > >Brad, W9FX > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >On Behalf of "Brad Pioveson W9FX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Submissions: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body >Hopelessly Lost: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message >Zerobeat Web Page: http://www.zerobeat.net >Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net http://www.tlchost.net/ >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >--- > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.727 / Virus Database: 482 - Release Date: 7/26/04 >
--- Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.727 / Virus Database: 482 - Release Date: 7/26/04
