- Original Message -
From: "Garey Barrell"
To:
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Sidetones (was Ten-Tec and Drake
Compared)
Darrell -
Most equipment sold before the early 1960's was NOT
'integrated'. I would say the vast
Darrell -
Most equipment sold before the early 1960's was NOT 'integrated'. I would say the vast majority of
ham stations had a receiver made by one company and a transmitter either homebrewed or made by
another company. Johnson and WRL didn't make receivers, and National and Hammarlund didn'
- Original Message -
From: "Darrell Bellerive"
To:
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Sidetones (was Ten-Tec and Drake
Compared)
I notice that most vintage receivers provide a mute, at
least the ones
I've seen, yet it's use doe
I notice that most vintage receivers provide a mute, at least the ones
I've seen, yet it's use doesn't seem to be that popular. Was this just
because the transmitters lacked sidetone or was there other reasons such
as timing or poor recovery?
73,
Darrell Bellerive
Amateur Radio Station VA7TO
On 0
Darrell,
I agree with you 100% on the lack of sidetone, etc. on vintage equipment.
When I completed my "ultimate boatanchor CW transmitter" last year, I
included sidetone, pumped through the matching homebrew receiver's audio and
well as the muting you mentioned.
73
Lee WB6SSW
__
5 matches
Mail list logo
