Re: [drakelist] QUESTION S: R-4 and 2-B IF bandwidth filtering

2005-06-17 Thread Al Parker
Al Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Hi dt, If you want to listen to AM, why not use a receiver that was designed primarily to receive it, not one that was primarily designed for SSB? It

RE: [drakelist] QUESTION S: R-4 and 2-B IF bandwidth filtering

2005-06-17 Thread Grant Youngman
Grant Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- If you want to listen to AM, why not use a receiver that was designed primarily to receive it ..? Just another grouchy opinion, maybe worth abt

RE: [drakelist] QUESTION S: R-4 and 2-B IF bandwidth filtering

2005-06-17 Thread john
john [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- I'll second that. An R4B on the BBC is a very pleasant radio to listen to. John K5MO At 05:45 PM 6/17/2005, Grant Youngman wrote: Grant Youngman [EMAIL

Re: [drakelist] QUESTION S: R-4 and 2-B IF bandwidth filtering

2005-06-17 Thread GAREY - K4OAH
GAREY - K4OAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- David - The only one of the group that lends itself to widening is the R-4C. There is a 4 pole 8 kHz roofing filter up front in all the R-4 receivers