Hi Gianluca,
I'm pleased to announce I now have it working Yay!!!
Turns out the DRBD configuration was just fine.
I was a combination of using the right resource type (postgres-8) and the
order/dependencies of the resources.
Thanks for your help!!!
Here's my cluster.conf and drbd.conf for a
Hi!
I have a very strange performance issues with DRBD. I have two DRBD
nodes - nasnode0 and nasnode1. They are running two raid 10 with 4 sata
disks, and 1 raid10 with 6 sata disks. All volumes are exported via
iSCSI (ietd) to client servers. Client server run Xen vm's.
Now, my problem is that w
Thanks for your reply. I did try the built-in ocf script but ran into some
problems early on. Now that I understand some of this a little better, let me
go back and try it again.
I just wanted to make sure that it's not something I did wrong with DRBD.
Thanks for helping me understand. I'll g
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:03 PM, James Perry wrote:
> Hi Gianluca,
>
> You have described exactly what I'm doing to test this. I kill the
> postmaster process. I've tried both a script resource as well as a
> postgres-8 resource but neither seem to work. What's odd is that I can
> relocate th
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:11:16PM -0800, Mike Sweetser - Adhost
wrote:
> > Linux SERVER 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen #1 SMP Tue Oct 27 11:45:55 EDT
> 2009
> > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >
> > It's running RHEL 5.4 in a Xen virtual machine.
>
> In that case, it is expected to just work.
I comple
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:11:16PM -0800, Mike Sweetser - Adhost wrote:
> Linux SERVER 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen #1 SMP Tue Oct 27 11:45:55 EDT 2009
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> It's running RHEL 5.4 in a Xen virtual machine.
In that case, it is expected to just work.
--
: Lars Ellenberg
Linux SERVER 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen #1 SMP Tue Oct 27 11:45:55 EDT 2009
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
It's running RHEL 5.4 in a Xen virtual machine.
--
Mike Sweetser, RHCT, WCSP | Systems Administrator
Adhost Internet
140 Fourth Avenue North, Suite 360, Seattle, Washin
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:37:08AM -0800, Mike Sweetser - Adhost wrote:
> As a followup, I tried different versions of DRBD on the Xen machines,
> and was able to get it working with DRBD 8.3.2 and earlier. 8.3.3 and
> later causes the kernel panic.
>
> Were any changes made to DRBD from 8.3.3 on
Here's the data from the kernel panic - I'm not sure where the core
would be kept to get the stack trace from.
Starting DRBD resources: [ d(backup) Unable to handle kernel paging
request at 81017480403c RIP:
[] :drbd:drbd_md_read+0xd7/0x236
PGD 17b65c063 PUD 0
Oops: [1] SMP
last sysfs
Hi Gianluca,
You have described exactly what I'm doing to test this. I kill the postmaster
process. I've tried both a script resource as well as a postgres-8 resource
but neither seem to work. What's odd is that I can relocate the service to
either node without issue. It's only when I "Brea
Can we please get a complete stack trace?
Thanks.
Cheers,
Florian
On 2009-12-09 20:37, Mike Sweetser - Adhost wrote:
> As a followup, I tried different versions of DRBD on the Xen machines,
> and was able to get it working with DRBD 8.3.2 and earlier. 8.3.3 and
> later causes the kernel panic.
As a followup, I tried different versions of DRBD on the Xen machines,
and was able to get it working with DRBD 8.3.2 and earlier. 8.3.3 and
later causes the kernel panic.
Were any changes made to DRBD from 8.3.3 onward that causes problems
with Xen? Are there parameters I need to set?
Here's m
We utilize DRBD to replicate data between Vienna, Austria and Beaverton,
OR. We use a "follow the sun" model, so whatever timezone has business
hours becomes the primary
So to answer your questions:
> First off, can it be done?
Yes it can, see above statement.
> What impediments and / or issues
Mark Watts wrote:
>
> Well, if you bought Fiber-Ethernet cards, I suspect that would work.
>
Right.. what is the card? If Ethernet, no problem.
But the interface being fibre doesn't tell much.
FC? Ethernet? Infiniband?
-Charlie
___
drbd-user maili
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> Ok.
> We apparently have a problem with 64K page size.
> We could do a "hot fix", to get you going,
> but that may work only "accidentally" ;)
>
What do you mean "accidentally"?
Wouldn't work all the time or sometimes will crash the box?
If none o
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:49:02AM -0800, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
> --- On Wed, 12/9/09, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>
> >
> > Architecture?
> > uname -a?
> >
> >
>
> Linux ashlin02 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 18 15:58:09 EDT 2009 ppc64 ppc64
> ppc64 GNU/Linux
Ok.
We apparently have a problem with
On 2009-12-09 14:16, Joe Bill wrote:
> Just to fix a few showstoppers when building DRBD under SLES 11...
>
> 1)
>
> At http://www.drbd.org/users-guide-emb/s-build-rpm.html
>
> every occurence of ...
>
> `rpm -E _sourcedir`
>
> should read instead ...
>
> `rpm -E %_sourcedir`
Thanks, will be
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>
> Architecture?
> uname -a?
>
>
Linux ashlin02 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 18 15:58:09 EDT 2009 ppc64 ppc64
ppc64 GNU/Linux
Thank you,
Vadym Chepkov
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbi
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:28:28PM +0100, Marian Schmotzer wrote:
> Hi everyone
> I found problem with compilation drbd kernel module version 8.3.6 on one
> of our systems. System is xen domU with kernel 2.6.18-r12 .
> After deeper look into problem i found that module can be compiled
> without xe
Just to fix a few showstoppers when building DRBD under SLES 11...
1)
At http://www.drbd.org/users-guide-emb/s-build-rpm.html
every occurence of ...
`rpm -E _sourcedir`
should read instead ...
`rpm -E %_sourcedir`
2)
Then, several occurences of '/etc/SuSErelease', in files
'configure' and '
Hi everyone
I found problem with compilation drbd kernel module version 8.3.6 on one
of our systems. System is xen domU with kernel 2.6.18-r12 .
After deeper look into problem i found that module can be compiled
without xen compatibility flag set in kernel source, or if xen
compatible kernel is se
On 2009-12-08 01:20, Ivan Ho wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are using DRBD v8.2.6 and recently ran into an issue where the
> primary and secondary were stuck in WFBitMapS and WFBitMapT.
>
> We then applied the following patch:
>
> http://git.drbd.org/?p=drbd-8.2.git;a=commit;h=e350643dd4d42a9b06a283
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:02 AM, James Perry wrote:
[snip]
> Here's the error I'm getting... It appears that DRBD is failing but I can't
> tell why.
>
> Dec 7 14:34:49 rhcsnode1 clurgmgrd[8024]: Service
> service:mezeo_ha_db started
> Dec 7 14:36:36 rhcsnode1 clurgmgrd: [8024]: script:pgsql_s
Dear all,
Any idea for this ?
regards,
Edward
From: guohuai...@hotmail.com
To: james.mas...@tradefair.com; drbd-user@lists.linbit.com;
guohuailee0...@gmail.com; lichangl...@hisense.com
Subject: allow doubal primary and the notice
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:00:35 +0800
Dear all,
so
Hiya
Id like to know. Does anyone exercise geo location redundancy using drbd.
First off, can it be done?
What impediments and / or issues have you experienced?
What is the impact on your network. (I might be considering hosting two
datacentres, so im hoping that may not be an issue, but I am w
Hello, I upgrade my Kernel. Now when I start DRBD I have the message:
# /etc/init.d/drbd start
DRBD module version: 8.3.1
userland version: 8.3.3
Why this difference?
#modinfo drbd
filename: /lib/modules/2.6.31-16-server/updates/dkms/drbd.ko
alias: block-major-147
Hiya
Id like to know. Does anyone exercise geo location redundancy using drbd.
First off, can it be done?
What impediments and / or issues have you experienced?
What is the impact on your network. (I might be considering hosting two
datacentres, so im hoping that may not be an issue, but I am w
Hi,
We are using DRBD v8.2.6 and recently ran into an issue where the primary and
secondary were stuck in WFBitMapS and WFBitMapT.
We then applied the following patch:
http://git.drbd.org/?p=drbd-8.2.git;a=commit;h=e350643dd4d42a9b06a28377369d3c6a4c7b61ed
which has resolved the stuck, but now
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:51:54AM +0100, Maxence DUNNEWIND wrote:
> > Hard reboot (e.g.
> > echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq
> > echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger
> > ) and drbd upgrade.
> Ok, thanks for the tip. Is this a bug I should report somewhere?
well,
* you did already
* I told you
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 12:20:52PM +0800, guohuai li wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Would you help to tell me how to make the resource secondary mandatorily ?
>
>
>
> Now I use DRBD8.3.0.
Would you please simply upgrade to 8.3.5.
Thank you.
--
: Lars Ellenberg
: LINBIT | Your Way to High
> Hard reboot (e.g.
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq
> echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger
> ) and drbd upgrade.
Ok, thanks for the tip. Is this a bug I should report somewhere?
Cheers,
Maxence
--
Maxence DUNNEWIND
Contact : maxe...@dunnewind.net
Site : http://www.dunnewind.net
06 32 39 3
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 05:10:15PM +0100, Maxence DUNNEWIND wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the drbd16 device is indeed blocking lvchange :
> z2-3:~# lsof /dev/drbd16
> COMMANDPID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFFNODE NAME
> lvchange 4969 root5u BLK 147,16 0t0 1328107 /dev/drbd16
>
> what i
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:50:09AM -0800, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
> > no, it's default kernel from Redhat 5.4
> > kernel-2.6.18-164.el5
>
> [vchep...@ashlin02 ~]$ rpm -qa|egrep "kernel|drbd"
> kernel-devel-2.6.18-164.el5
> drbd-8.3.5-3
> kernel-headers-2.6.18-164.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-164.el5
> drbd-km
On 2009-12-08 18:11, jayfitzpatr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Mark.
>
> I suspected the same, but our storage guy was hoping that there was some
> way of having the fiber cards talking to each other without the need for
> the tcpip encapsulation, therefore reducing the overhead
You can run Infiniband
34 matches
Mail list logo