Le 19/11/2014 19:58, Dischino, Chris a écrit :
Is it correct to issue an fsck on the drbd device instead of the
backing device ? Do you see any issues with this.
It's not only correct, it's the only right thing to do. Particularly,
don't let fsck correct the filesystem on the backing
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:43:34PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:33:32 +0100
The lc_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
Hi everybody
Can drbd's verify pause and resume ?
Please tell me how to pause and resume verify.
Kyousuke Asakura___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 07:01:08PM +0900, kad76oglz...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
Hi everybody
Can drbd's verify pause and resume ?
Please tell me how to pause and resume verify.
Did you read the man-pages for drbdadm and especially drbdsetup?
$ man drbdsetup
and enter this to hit the
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:10:14AM +0100, Lionel Sausin wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 19:58, Dischino, Chris a écrit :
Is it correct to issue an fsck on the drbd device instead of the
backing device ? Do you see any issues with this.
It's not only correct, it's the only right thing to do.
Greetings Lars,
I am wondering about removing the spin locks around the linked list operators
in worker.c or do we need to test it first it first on actual hardware.
Cheers Nick
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Hi all,
I compiled drbd-utils-8.9.1.tar.gz and drbd-8.4.5.tar.gz from
http://oss.linbit.com/drbd/ for XenServer 6.2.
Everything seems to work as expected, but on start I get the following
message:
# /etc/init.d/drbd start
Starting DRBD resources: [
create res: r0
prepare disk: r0
