Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

2016-08-18 Thread dan
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Veit Wahlich wrote: > But the shortest link is not guaranteed. Especially after recovery from > a network link failure. > You might want to monitor each node for the shortest path. Simplest solution here is to overbuild. If you are going to do a

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

2016-08-18 Thread Veit Wahlich
Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2016, 12:33 +0200 schrieb Roberto Resoli: > Il 18/08/2016 10:09, Adam Goryachev ha scritto: > > I can't comment on the DRBD related portions, but can't you add both > > interfaces on each machine to a single bridge, and then configure the IP > > address on the bridge.

[DRBD-user] Ressource decomission stuck

2016-08-18 Thread Julien Escario
Hello, After rebooting a node, I can see somthing strange : # drbdmanage list-assignments > | vm4 | vm-206-disk-1 | * | | > ok | > | vm5 | vm-206-disk-1 | * | | >

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

2016-08-18 Thread Roberto Resoli
Il 18/08/2016 10:09, Adam Goryachev ha scritto: >> > I can't comment on the DRBD related portions, but can't you add both > interfaces on each machine to a single bridge, and then configure the IP > address on the bridge. Hence each machine will only have one IP address, > and the other machines

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

2016-08-18 Thread Roland Kammerer
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 09:47:51AM +0200, Roberto Resoli wrote: > In particular I see that currently is not possible to dedicate an IP for > every different link betwen a managed resource and its peer node. > > Am I wrong? No. > Any advice/suggestion? Don't do it ;-). We had that discussion

Re: [DRBD-user] Is DRBD9 ready for production

2016-08-18 Thread Julien Escario
Le 11/08/2016 09:10, Ml Ml a écrit : > Hello List, > > i wonder if DRBD9 is ready for production? > > I posted my Problem here: > http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2016-April/022893.html > > And i ran into this problem a few times now. So i switched to a 2 Node > Setup (which works

Re: [DRBD-user] drbdmanage v0.97

2016-08-18 Thread Julien Escario
Le 17/08/2016 12:19, Roland Kammerer a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:34:22AM +0200, Julien Escario wrote: >> So my question now : is there a way to restart drbdmanage 'server' without >> having to restart the whole server ? As it's dbus, I don't want to create a >> mess. > > "drbdmanage

[DRBD-user] Replication Problems

2016-08-18 Thread Raman Gupta
Hi, I am using DRBD version 8.4 on CentOS6 and having some issues in understanding the replication mechanism. Configuration Details: - [root@centos6 ~]# drbdadm --version DRBDADM_API_VERSION=1 DRBD_KERNEL_VERSION_CODE=0x080407 DRBDADM_VERSION_CODE=0x080905

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

2016-08-18 Thread Adam Goryachev
On 18/08/2016 17:47, Roberto Resoli wrote: Hello, I'm currently running a three nodes cluster with drbd 9.0.3 and drbdmanage 0.97. It happens that in my setup i can dedicate two phisical interfaces per node to the storage network, and possibly create a "full mesh" network as of Chapter 5.1.4

[DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

2016-08-18 Thread Roberto Resoli
Hello, I'm currently running a three nodes cluster with drbd 9.0.3 and drbdmanage 0.97. It happens that in my setup i can dedicate two phisical interfaces per node to the storage network, and possibly create a "full mesh" network as of Chapter 5.1.4 of DRBD9 manual