On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Veit Wahlich wrote:
> But the shortest link is not guaranteed. Especially after recovery from
> a network link failure.
> You might want to monitor each node for the shortest path.
Simplest solution here is to overbuild. If you are going to do a
Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2016, 12:33 +0200 schrieb Roberto Resoli:
> Il 18/08/2016 10:09, Adam Goryachev ha scritto:
> > I can't comment on the DRBD related portions, but can't you add both
> > interfaces on each machine to a single bridge, and then configure the IP
> > address on the bridge.
Hello,
After rebooting a node, I can see somthing strange :
# drbdmanage list-assignments
> | vm4 | vm-206-disk-1 | * | |
> ok |
> | vm5 | vm-206-disk-1 | * | |
>
Il 18/08/2016 10:09, Adam Goryachev ha scritto:
>>
> I can't comment on the DRBD related portions, but can't you add both
> interfaces on each machine to a single bridge, and then configure the IP
> address on the bridge. Hence each machine will only have one IP address,
> and the other machines
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 09:47:51AM +0200, Roberto Resoli wrote:
> In particular I see that currently is not possible to dedicate an IP for
> every different link betwen a managed resource and its peer node.
>
> Am I wrong?
No.
> Any advice/suggestion?
Don't do it ;-).
We had that discussion
Le 11/08/2016 09:10, Ml Ml a écrit :
> Hello List,
>
> i wonder if DRBD9 is ready for production?
>
> I posted my Problem here:
> http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2016-April/022893.html
>
> And i ran into this problem a few times now. So i switched to a 2 Node
> Setup (which works
Le 17/08/2016 12:19, Roland Kammerer a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:34:22AM +0200, Julien Escario wrote:
>> So my question now : is there a way to restart drbdmanage 'server' without
>> having to restart the whole server ? As it's dbus, I don't want to create a
>> mess.
>
> "drbdmanage
Hi,
I am using DRBD version 8.4 on CentOS6 and having some issues in
understanding the replication mechanism.
Configuration Details:
-
[root@centos6 ~]# drbdadm --version
DRBDADM_API_VERSION=1
DRBD_KERNEL_VERSION_CODE=0x080407
DRBDADM_VERSION_CODE=0x080905
On 18/08/2016 17:47, Roberto Resoli wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently running a three nodes cluster with drbd 9.0.3 and
drbdmanage 0.97.
It happens that in my setup i can dedicate two phisical interfaces per
node to the storage network, and possibly create a "full mesh" network
as of Chapter 5.1.4
Hello,
I'm currently running a three nodes cluster with drbd 9.0.3 and
drbdmanage 0.97.
It happens that in my setup i can dedicate two phisical interfaces per
node to the storage network, and possibly create a "full mesh" network
as of Chapter 5.1.4 of DRBD9 manual
10 matches
Mail list logo