Il 17/02/2017 14:16, Lars Ellenberg ha scritto:
> Thanks, I've updated to 0.99.2 now in repo; much better, most resources
> are up at startup.
>
> drbdmanage restart keeps failing (sometimes shutdown, wait, startup
> succeeds) :
Just upgraded to python-drbdmanage 0.99.3-1 from pve repo.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:30:03AM +0100, Roberto Resoli wrote:
> Il 17/02/2017 09:51, Roland Kammerer ha scritto:
> >> does not fixes the situation anymore, the "start" part failing most of
> >> times.
> > Hi,
> >
> > yes, there was a regression. Hopefully 0.99.2 fixed that.
>
> Thanks, I've
Il 17/02/2017 09:51, Roland Kammerer ha scritto:
>> does not fixes the situation anymore, the "start" part failing most of
>> times.
> Hi,
>
> yes, there was a regression. Hopefully 0.99.2 fixed that.
Thanks, I've updated to 0.99.2 now in repo; much better, most resources
are up at startup.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:39:42PM +0100, Roberto Resoli wrote:
> Il 09/01/2017 10:56, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
> > Il 29/12/2016 15:01, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
> >> Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
> >>> Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
> All is up and
Il 09/01/2017 10:56, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
> Il 29/12/2016 15:01, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
>> Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
>>> Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
All is up and running nicely, in any case.
>> Another issue: drbdmanaged starts at boot, but
I'm freaking out!.
In my previous message I sent the syslog about drbdmanaged startup at
boot time, hoping for help.
Moreover today, starting servers, not only I had to make drbdmanage
restart but after done it , checking drbdsetup status I found a
problem on vm-104:
On PVE1:
You can find the syslog about yesterday drbdmanaged startup at boot here:
http://www.sardi.it/log_drbdmanaged.txt
I'm not able to understand the problem.
Thank in advance for any further help.
Michele
Il 13/01/2017 21:01, Michele Rossetti ha scritto:
Stupid me, now all working, maybe the
Stupid me, now all working, maybe the resources was gone down upgrading?
Thanks a lot,
Michele
Il 13/01/2017 19:58, Michele Rossetti ha scritto:
root@mpve1:~# drbdsetup status
.drbdctrl role:Secondary
volume:0 disk:UpToDate
volume:1 disk:UpToDate
mpve2 role:Secondary
volume:0
Il 13/01/2017 19:58, Michele Rossetti ha scritto:
> root@mpve1:~# drbdsetup status
> .drbdctrl role:Secondary
> volume:0 disk:UpToDate
> volume:1 disk:UpToDate
> mpve2 role:Secondary
> volume:0 peer-disk:UpToDate
> volume:1 peer-disk:UpToDate
> mpve3 role:Primary
> volume:0
After upgrade, dist upgrade to PVE 4.4 and drbdmanage-proxmox
install, the KVM VMs don't start anymore at boot, they start only if
are on primary node, and when started don't migrate for priaery node
to secondary, even in HA.
The error messages from PVE are:
kvm: -drive
Il 10/01/2017 11:04, Michele Rossetti ha scritto:
> Yes, I confirm that yesterday too, on a 3 server PVE4.3 with DRBD9
> deployed from Proxmox repository, I make a backup and a restore of a KVM
> virtual machine; moreover I migrate the VM on the 3 PVE without problem.
>
> This is the reason of
Yes, I confirm that yesterday too, on a 3 server PVE4.3 with DRBD9
deployed from Proxmox repository, I make a backup and a restore of a
KVM virtual machine; moreover I migrate the VM on the 3 PVE without
problem.
This is the reason of my previous post, to understand if your problem
was
Il 10/01/2017 10:14, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
> Il 09/01/2017 19:20, Michele Rossetti ha scritto:
>> This means that in PVE cluster of 3 servers with DRBD9 updated isn't
>> possible to restore KVM virtual machines?
>> Other people on list with the same problem or is only in your
>>
Il 09/01/2017 19:20, Michele Rossetti ha scritto:
> This means that in PVE cluster of 3 servers with DRBD9 updated isn't
> possible to restore KVM virtual machines?
> Other people on list with the same problem or is only in your
> configuration?
> Just to know before update ;-)
I have just
Il 09/01/2017 19:20, Michele Rossetti ha scritto:
> This means that in PVE cluster of 3 servers with DRBD9 updated isn't
> possible to restore KVM virtual machines?
> Other people on list with the same problem or is only in your
> configuration?
> Just to know before update ;-)
This means that in
This means that in PVE cluster of 3 servers with DRBD9 updated isn't
possible to restore KVM virtual machines?
Other people on list with the same problem or is only in your configuration?
Just to know before update ;-)
Thanks,
Michele
Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
Il
Il 29/12/2016 15:01, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
> Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
>> Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
>>> All is up and running nicely, in any case.
> Another issue: drbdmanaged starts at boot, but most resources remain down; a
>
> drbdmanaged
Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
> Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
>> All is up and running nicely, in any case.
>
> I said that too early: I tried to restore a kvm virtual machine and it
> fails, systematically.
>
> I attached here the command with relative
Il 04/01/2017 13:51, Roland Kammerer ha scritto:
> If you are a
> company and you provide commercial support/commercial trainings and make
> money out of that support business, then I think it is fair to give back
> a bit to the people that wrote the stuff you are making money with.
I agree, here
Il 04/01/2017 12:42, Igor Cicimov ha scritto:
> For the "has to remove [...] completely": Puh, dangerous territory to
> comment on, but that was the decision of Proxmox.
>
>
> No serious company would integrate drbd in their product and then tell
> their customers to talk to Linbit in
Nachricht-
Von: drbd-user-boun...@lists.linbit.com
[mailto:drbd-user-boun...@lists.linbit.com] Im Auftrag von Roland Kammerer
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Januar 2017 09:33
An: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Betreff: Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:38
etmar Maurer
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Januar 2017 10:20
An: Roland Kammerer <roland.kamme...@linbit.com>; drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Betreff: Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE
In the end the license - and sure IANAL - is a "do whatever you like,
but don't interfere wit
Yet some consideration for the interest of all.
My age has sadly brought me to see several failures of good
initiatives due to pure misunderstandings.
We have two products PVE 4 and DRBD9 that seem made for each other,
they are absolutely complementary.
We have two companies Proxmox and
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:42:54PM +1100, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> No serious company would integrate drbd in their product and then tell
> their customers to talk to Linbit in case of issues.
The license was only changed for drbdmanage. Kernel and drbd-utils are
still under the old license.
These
An: Roland Kammerer <roland.kamme...@linbit.com>; drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Betreff: Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE
> In the end the license - and sure IANAL - is a "do whatever you like,
> but don't interfere with LINBIT's support busi
> In the end the license - and sure IANAL - is a "do whatever you like,
> but don't interfere with LINBIT's support business". IMO that's it. This
> was not a move against Proxmox at all, there are other vendors not
> playing nice... Just writing that because on the ML I have the
> impression that
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:38:38AM +, Enrica Ruedin wrote:
> I can't understand Linbit to change license in such a way that PVE
> Proxmox has to remove their support completely. This unnecessary
> change leads to confusion.
But you do understand that we also eat and like to have a roof over
...@lists.linbit.com] Im Auftrag von Michele Rossetti
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Januar 2017 14:53
An: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Betreff: Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE
One advice from who use drbd9 on PVE in production, please: we have a cluster
of 3 PVe 4.3 servers with the last
Thanks, Rob,
I understand that you use PVE and DRBD only for testing and not in
production, right?
Il 02/01/2017 14:53, Michele Rossetti ha scritto:
One advice from who use drbd9 on PVE in production, please: we have a
cluster of 3 PVe 4.3 servers with the last DRBD version available prom
Il 02/01/2017 14:53, Michele Rossetti ha scritto:
> One advice from who use drbd9 on PVE in production, please: we have a
> cluster of 3 PVe 4.3 servers with the last DRBD version available prom
> PVE repository.
>
> I read on the list that there are several problems with new DRBD
> version,
I
One advice from who use drbd9 on PVE in production, please: we have a
cluster of 3 PVe 4.3 servers with the last DRBD version available
prom PVE repository.
I read on the list that there are several problems with new DRBD
version, not more included on PVE repository, but I don't understand
Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
> Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
>> All is up and running nicely, in any case.
Another issue: drbdmanaged starts at boot, but most resources remain down; a
drbdmanaged restart
fixes that.
I attach a related fragment from syslog;
Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
> Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
>> All is up and running nicely, in any case.
> I said that too early: I tried to restore a kvm virtual machine and it
> fails, systematically.
>
> I attached here the command with relative output,
Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
> All is up and running nicely, in any case.
I said that too early: I tried to restore a kvm virtual machine and it
fails, systematically.
I attached here the command with relative output, and the fragment of
syslog related to restore.
It seems
On 27/12/2016 12:08, Roland Kammerer wrote :
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:26:45AM +0100, Jean-Daniel Tissot wrote:
>>
>>
>> > http-equiv="Content-Type">
>>
>>
>> On 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli
>> wrote :
> Please stop sending html-only mail.
Sorry for that, I do
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:26:45AM +0100, Jean-Daniel Tissot wrote:
>
>
>http-equiv="Content-Type">
>
>
> On 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli
> wrote :
Please stop sending html-only mail.
> I used DRBD 9 knowing it is not recommended for production.
Hm,
Il 27/12/2016 11:26, Jean-Daniel Tissot ha scritto:
> On 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli wrote :
>> I have successfully done the transition to linbit repo drbdmanage.
> Hi,
> Well, I have done a three nodes PVE cluster. I can't use CEPH or others
> storage technologies.
> I used DRBD 9 knowing
On 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli
wrote :
I have successfully done the transition to linbit repo drbdmanage.
Hi,
Well, I have done a three nodes PVE cluster. I can't use CEPH or
others storage technologies.
I used DRBD 9 knowing it is not
Il 23/12/2016 12:22, Roberto Resoli ha scritto:
>> So, this is essentially a stop-the-world and then upgrade scenario.
> I agree. Will try directly that.
I have successfully done the transition to linbit repo drbdmanage.
I stopped all vms (but one), upgraded to new components as in the [1]
note
Il 23/12/2016 09:48, Roland Kammerer ha scritto:
...
>>> ...There I would need more information. The version
>>> we ship and the one from proxmox are very different. In between these
>>> versions the architecture of DM was changed. Just as an example: If you
>>> have two nodes in your cluster
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:48:48PM +0100, Roberto Resoli wrote:
> (Bad start, forget the message with the wrong title...)
>
> I start a new thread, as suggested in [1];
>
> I would like to test the new Linbit repositorry for Proxmox Virtual
> Environment [2], and I need some preliminary
41 matches
Mail list logo
