Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Il 31/08/2016 15:06, Lars Ellenberg ha scritto: > Instead of bridging, > explicit routes could be an other option. > ip route add .../.. dev ... > > Lars Already tried, and didn't work for me, I guess that if there are two interfaces with same IP drbd processes will listen on one only.

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:43:18AM +0200, Roberto Resoli wrote: > Il 18/08/2016 14:03, Veit Wahlich ha scritto: > > Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2016, 12:33 +0200 schrieb Roberto Resoli: > >> Il 18/08/2016 10:09, Adam Goryachev ha scritto: > >>> I can't comment on the DRBD related portions, but can't

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Il 18/08/2016 14:03, Veit Wahlich ha scritto: > Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2016, 12:33 +0200 schrieb Roberto Resoli: >> Il 18/08/2016 10:09, Adam Goryachev ha scritto: >>> I can't comment on the DRBD related portions, but can't you add both >>> interfaces on each machine to a single bridge, and then

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Hi Dan, Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2016, 10:33 -0600 schrieb dan: > Simplest solution here is to overbuild. If you are going to do a > 3-node 'full-mesh' then you should consider 10G ethernet (a melanox w/ > cables on ebay is about US$20 w/ cables!). Then you just enable STP > on all the bridges

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Il 18/08/2016 11:15, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 09:47:51AM +0200, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> In particular I see that currently is not possible to dedicate an IP for >> every different link betwen a managed resource and its peer node. >> >> Am I wrong? > > No. > >> Any

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Veit Wahlich wrote: > But the shortest link is not guaranteed. Especially after recovery from > a network link failure. > You might want to monitor each node for the shortest path. Simplest solution here is to overbuild. If you are going to do a

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2016, 12:33 +0200 schrieb Roberto Resoli: > Il 18/08/2016 10:09, Adam Goryachev ha scritto: > > I can't comment on the DRBD related portions, but can't you add both > > interfaces on each machine to a single bridge, and then configure the IP > > address on the bridge.

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Il 18/08/2016 10:09, Adam Goryachev ha scritto: >> > I can't comment on the DRBD related portions, but can't you add both > interfaces on each machine to a single bridge, and then configure the IP > address on the bridge. Hence each machine will only have one IP address, > and the other machines

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 09:47:51AM +0200, Roberto Resoli wrote: > In particular I see that currently is not possible to dedicate an IP for > every different link betwen a managed resource and its peer node. > > Am I wrong? No. > Any advice/suggestion? Don't do it ;-). We had that discussion

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

On 18/08/2016 17:47, Roberto Resoli wrote: Hello, I'm currently running a three nodes cluster with drbd 9.0.3 and drbdmanage 0.97. It happens that in my setup i can dedicate two phisical interfaces per node to the storage network, and possibly create a "full mesh" network as of Chapter 5.1.4

[DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Hello, I'm currently running a three nodes cluster with drbd 9.0.3 and drbdmanage 0.97. It happens that in my setup i can dedicate two phisical interfaces per node to the storage network, and possibly create a "full mesh" network as of Chapter 5.1.4 of DRBD9 manual