From: drbd-user-boun...@lists.linbit.com
on behalf of Philipp Reisner
Sent: 31 October 2023 16:07
To: drbd-annou...@lists.linbit.com
Cc: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Subject: [DRBD-user] drbd-9.1.17 and drbd-9.2.6
Hi,
The tags for these releases don't seem to have made it it github yet. Is it
Hi,
I have some problems with creating rpm's in this version (previous was
okay):
./configure --with-distro=suse
...
make rpm
test -e .version
test -e .filelist
Makefile:186: *** environment variable VERSION is not set. Stop.
There seems to be some destructive changes in the Makefile etc.
Nevermind decided not to be lazy (saturday and all that) and do it
properly. Done now.
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 12:40 pm Igor Cicimov Hi,
>
> According to https://docs.linbit.com/docs/users-guide-8.4/#s-resizing,
> when resizing DRBD 8.4 device online one side of the mirror needs to
> be Secondary. I
On 08/23/2018 10:15 PM, Daniel Ragle wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm setting up my first DBRD pair for testing and curious as to which
> version I should use.
>
> I definitely need a dual primary system, as I need the load balancing
> between the two nodes. I may need to move to a multiple-node (3+)
>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 02:55:18PM +0100, Philipp Reisner wrote:
> http://www.drbd.org/download/drbd/utils/drbd-utils-8.9.10.tar.gz
There was a minor flaw in the packaged "./configure" which made drbdmon
building impossible without regenerating the script. No additional/code
changes.
I've been curious about this too as we are in the same boat with Gentoo.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Jean-Francois Maeyhieux b...@free.fr
wrote:
We are using a ganeti cluster in production environment using a
classical KVM/LVM/DRBD stack using dedicated 10gbs nics for drbd
Dear Lars
Thank you for your answer.
I did chmod -x /sbin/kpartx
DRBD worked fine.
Thank you
--- On Sat, 2014/5/17, Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:03:55PM +0900, kad76oglz...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
Dear Lars
Thank you for your answer.
I will
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 02:07:21PM +0900, kad76oglz...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
Dear Lars
Thank you for your answer.
Something already claimed mapatha.
Maybe you need to exclude kpartx from mapping internal partitions,
or adjust the lvm filter to exclude that device.
What's supposed to be on
Dear Lars
Thank you for your answer.
What's supposed to be on that device?
File system? VM image? LVM PV?
File system.Not use VM and LVM.
I used write partition by parted
--- On Tue, 2014/5/13, Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 06:43:58PM +0900,
Dear Lars
Thank you for your answer.
Something already claimed mapatha.
Maybe you need to exclude kpartx from mapping internal partitions,
or adjust the lvm filter to exclude that device.
What's supposed to be on that device?
File system? VM image? LVM PV?
I didn't use LVM.
device are
Hi Phil,
Any further progress on DRBD 9 you can share with us?
(or perhaps even a glimpse on an expected v9.0.0-final release date ? :) ... )
Yours,
Chris
On 8/14/2013 11:13 PM, Philipp Reisner wrote:
Hi,
this is a *double release* day. On the drbd-9 side great
progress was made since
On 14/08/13 17:13, Philipp Reisner wrote:
8.3.16rc1 (api:88/proto:86-97)
* fix decoding of bitmap vli rle for device sizes 64 TB
* fix for deadlock when using automatic split-brain-recovery
* only fail empty flushes if no good data is reachable
* avoid to shrink max_bio_size
Thanks, applied.
Best regards,
Phil
From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn
Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail().
spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun
On 04/26/2011 01:05 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Matching LVs are not the same LVs. The LV with your VM is a single item,
and having it treated as such, which you get with clvmd, will ensure
that it's not startable on either node at the same time.
Okay, that could be valuable. Thanks. How does
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 10:21:44PM -0400, Digimer wrote:
Matching LVs are not the same LVs. The LV with your VM is a single item,
and having it treated as such, which you get with clvmd, will ensure
that it's not startable on either node at the same time.
Okay, that could be valuable. Thanks.
On 04/24/2011 10:05 PM, Digimer wrote:
Comments in-line.
On 04/24/2011 11:34 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Digimer,
All useful stuff. Thanks. I hadn't considered three rather than two
networks. That's a good case for it.
Here's what I'm trying to scope out, and from your comments it looks to be
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Why do you need a P/P configuration for live migration? From what I
understand the VM state will be migrated from the source host to the
target host and then the storage will be unmounted on the source and
mounted again on the target. That should make the specific
On 4/23/11 9:59 PM, Patrick Egloff wrote:
I got several pm urging me NOT to use active/active and OCFS2.
Hi, what were the stated reasons to avoid active/active OCFS2?
Did they prefer GFS2 or just not like active/active?
We have a few active/active clusters running OCFS2 and have not
Sotty, guys, but is it really necesary to use a clustered file system
for a primary-primary drbd with mysql? Does it really need a locking
system?
About using or not an active-active cluster, it depends on the needs
(high availability, load balancing) but both solutions work perfectly,
as mysql
On 04/24/2011 04:30 AM, Eduardo Gonzalez wrote:
Sotty, guys, but is it really necesary to use a clustered file system
for a primary-primary drbd with mysql? Does it really need a locking
system?
Yes, you need cluster locking, so that all nodes know when any one node
requests to lock part of
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 10:39:01AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
OCFS2 and GFS2 require cluster locking, which comes with a fair amount
of overhead. Primary/Secondary DRBD with a normal filesystem like ext3
will certainly be faster, but in Secondary, you can not access the
Secondary resource at
On 04/24/2011 09:57 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Digimer,
I really thank you for your long-form discussion. So much of the writing on
this stuff is terse, making for a steep learning curve.
You should be using Clustered LVM (clvmd). This way the LVM PV/VG/LVs
are in sync across both nodes at
Hi and thanks for the answer !
I got several pm urging me NOT to use active/active and OCFS2.
A more simpler active/passive and no OCFS2 would be the best choice Too
many things could go wrong with OCFS2 and active/active + MySQL.
But you fully understood my configuration and thanks for
On 04/22/2011 01:36 PM, Patrick Egloff wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, let me say that i'm a newbie with DRBD and not a high
level linux specialist...
Few are. Fewer still who claim to be. :)
I want to have a HA setup for my Intranet which is using PHP + MySQL.
(Joomla 1.6)
For that, i
Thanks for the reply. I actually came across that thread yesterday after I
originally sent the first e-mail. I've disabled checksumming using ethtool
-K described and it's been working great. It was also documented in this
thread:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443621
Thanks again,
On 04/08/2010 08:14 PM, Hany Fahim wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently running a Xen setup using the CentOS distribution DRBD
8.3.2 from Extras Repo. I'm running into consistent kernel panics when
I'm benchmarking the individual DomUs. When the primary node crashes,
the secondary also panics shortly
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:48:54PM +0200, Florian Haas wrote:
On 04/08/2010 08:14 PM, Hany Fahim wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently running a Xen setup using the CentOS distribution DRBD
8.3.2 from Extras Repo. I'm running into consistent kernel panics when
I'm benchmarking the individual DomUs.
27 matches
Mail list logo
