On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 09:53:21AM +0200, Jamie wrote:
> Hm, I'm taking a wild guess here and say that I will also have to upgrade to
> drbd 9 on the server where my secondary is placed? Or would that not be a
> problem, just upgrading on my computer and then not upgrading the server.
> The
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 06:34:44PM +0100, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> On 13/08/2019 16:22, Jamie wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2019 at 17:17:31, Jamie wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, I tried posting this message this morning and something
> > > apparently didn't work out correctly... :(
> >
> > Okay, consider
On 13/08/2019 16:22, Jamie wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2019 at 17:17:31, Jamie wrote:
Sorry, I tried posting this message this morning and something
apparently didn't work out correctly... :(
Okay, consider me stupid...? Somehow, I couldn't see my post from this
morning until just a moment ago.
On 13/08/2019 13:16, Roland Kammerer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:40:56PM +0100, Eddie Chapman wrote:
I interpreted the package "drbd.x86_64 - version 9.5.0-2.fc30" as being the
kernel module version 9.5, since what else is left after you've packages the
utilities and udev scripts? There's
On 13/08/2019 07:12, Roland Kammerer wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:00:40PM +0200, Jamie wrote:
Hi all,
I've encountered quite a problem after updating my Fedora 30 and I hope
someone might've come across this problem as well because I couldn't really
find a lot of information online.
I'm
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:00:40PM +0200, Jamie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've encountered quite a problem after updating my Fedora 30 and I hope
> someone might've come across this problem as well because I couldn't really
> find a lot of information online.
>
> I'm using the following:
>
> *
Hello Jamie,
On 12/08/2019 11:00, Jamie wrote:
//Aug 12 11:28:34 ///serverjm/ drbdadm[8142]: Command 'drbdsetup-84
new-resource VMNAME' terminated with exit code 20//
I'm not familiar in the slightest with how Fedora packages drbd in your
installation. However the above line strongly
