On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 09:39:45 Roland Kammerer wrote:
Correct. That depends a bit on who of us does the moderation. I usually
clear the moderation flag after some time when the name feels familiar
and I know the person isn't a spam bot...
I think I've figured this out now, I'll hopefully be
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 06:34:44PM +0100, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> On 13/08/2019 16:22, Jamie wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2019 at 17:17:31, Jamie wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, I tried posting this message this morning and something
> > > apparently didn't work out correctly... :(
> >
> > Okay, consider
Hi,
I am having the same problem as this thread:
https://lists.gt.net/drbd/users/30659?search_string=allow-two-primaries;#30659
I have a simple 2-node cluster and despite allow-two-primaries being explicitly
set to "no", drbd is perfectly happy to let me bring the secondary node into
primary
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 09:53:21AM +0200, Jamie wrote:
> Hm, I'm taking a wild guess here and say that I will also have to upgrade to
> drbd 9 on the server where my secondary is placed? Or would that not be a
> problem, just upgrading on my computer and then not upgrading the server.
> The
Hello,
Snapshot backup seems to have an issue:
root@pve1:~# pveversion
pve-manager/6.0-5/f8a710d7 (running kernel: 5.0.18-1-pve)
root@pve1:~# cat /etc/pve/storage.cfg
...
drbd: drbdpool
content rootdir,images
controller 10.1.1.254
controllervm 100
redundancy 2
