Re: [DRBD-user] 3 node setup problem

Il 08/06/2016 10:36, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:09:51PM +0200, Michele Rossetti wrote: >> > Thanks, Roland, >> > >> > but it seems impossible to configure with drbdmanage a complete mesh >> > configuration with 2 interfaces (cross patch) for each node. >> > Here

Re: [DRBD-user] drbdmanage, lvm thinlv, wrong free pool space calculation

Il 12/05/2016 17:58, Gaudenz Steinlin ha scritto: > > Hi Hi > I ran into the same problem someone > else previously reported here today: > http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2016-May/022909.html that's me, and others before > I then looked into the code to better understand how

Re: [DRBD-user] Problems with Diskless state

Il 04/05/2016 17:18, analisi...@libero.it ha scritto: > Messaggio originale >>Da: analisi...@libero.it >>Data: 04/05/2016 17.17 >>A: "analisi...@libero.it", >>Ogg: R: [DRBD-user] Problems with Diskless state >> >>Hi

[DRBD-user] DRBD9, lvmthin and free space (was: DRBD9 - drbdmanage wrong free pool size)

Hello, I'm interested in the DRBD9 usage with single pool thin provisioning, ( lvm_thinlv.LvmThinLv storage plugin) which is the default on latest Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE). I am under the latest version of drbd/drbdmanage from pve-no-subscription repo: # uname -r 4.4.6-1-pve # cat

Re: [DRBD-user] repository Key not more valid

Su giovedì 16 febbraio 2017 18:04:06 CET, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: Hi, trying to update my 3 server PVe 4.4 with DRBD9 system, now I get this warning: W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 09/01/2017 10:56, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 29/12/2016 15:01, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >> Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >>> Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >>>> All is up and running nicely, in any case. >> Anoth

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 17/02/2017 09:51, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: >> does not fixes the situation anymore, the "start" part failing most of >> times. > Hi, > > yes, there was a regression. Hopefully 0.99.2 fixed that. Thanks, I've updated to 0.99.2 now in repo; much better, most resources are up at startup.

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Il 18/08/2016 11:15, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 09:47:51AM +0200, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> In particular I see that currently is not possible to dedicate an IP for >> every different link betwen a managed resource and its peer node. >> >> Am

[DRBD-user] drbd9 cluster problems after reboot (related to resources definitions in /var/lib/drbd.d)

Hello, I'm running a drbd9 three node setup under Proxmox VE 4.2: # cat /proc/drbd version: 9.0.3-1 (api:2/proto:86-111) GIT-hash: a14cb9c3818612dfb8c3288db28a591d5a0fc2a6 build by root@nora, 2016-07-28 10:59:06 # dpkg -l drbdmanage ... ii drbdmanage 0.97-1 I'm experiencing

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd9 cluster problems after reboot (related to resources definitions in /var/lib/drbd.d)

Il 16/08/2016 17:11, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: >> This is strange: I just checked, and on my installation of 0.97-1, *.res >> > files get created when drbdmanaged starts, but disappear after a while >> > (few seconds after start) > 0.97-1 != 0.97.1 > > 0.97-1 is the first Debian release of

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd9 cluster problems after reboot (related to resources definitions in /var/lib/drbd.d)

Il 16/08/2016 15:06, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:27:31PM +0200, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> I noted that this seems related to disappearance of resources >> definitions under /var/lib/drbd.d/* (even if i know that text files >> definitions for drbdman

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Il 18/08/2016 14:03, Veit Wahlich ha scritto: > Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2016, 12:33 +0200 schrieb Roberto Resoli: >> Il 18/08/2016 10:09, Adam Goryachev ha scritto: >>> I can't comment on the DRBD related portions, but can't you add both >>> interfaces on each

Re: [DRBD-user] How to solve split brain?

Il 05/09/2016 12:56, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: > On node 1: > root@mpve1:~# drbdsetup status vm-100-disk-1 --verbose --statistics > vm-100-disk-1 node-id:0 role:Secondary suspended:no > write-ordering:flush > volume:0 minor:100 disk:Inconsistent > size:33554432 read:0 written:0

Re: [DRBD-user] How to solve split brain?

Il 02/09/2016 18:10, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: > Hi All, > I don't know if I'm involved in a split brain situation on my new > Proxmox4 with DRBD9 3 nodes, this is the output of drbd-overview: > > root@mpve2:~# drbd-overview > 0:.drbdctrl/0 Connected(3*) Secondary(3*) >

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Il 31/08/2016 15:06, Lars Ellenberg ha scritto: > Instead of bridging, > explicit routes could be an other option. > ip route add .../.. dev ... > > Lars Already tried, and didn't work for me, I guess that if there are two interfaces with same IP drbd processes will listen on one only.

Re: [DRBD-user] Proxmox VE 4.2 and DRBD 9 other problem

Il 16/09/2016 15:52, Jean-Daniel TISSOT ha scritto: > After another reboot, some links disappears from > /dev/drbd/by-disk/drbdpool and /dev/drbd/by-res. ... > > Could anybody explain this ? Look at this thread: http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2016-August/023164.html Bye, rob

[DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Hello, I'm currently running a three nodes cluster with drbd 9.0.3 and drbdmanage 0.97. It happens that in my setup i can dedicate two phisical interfaces per node to the storage network, and possibly create a "full mesh" network as of Chapter 5.1.4 of DRBD9 manual

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9: full-mesh and managed resources

Il 18/08/2016 10:09, Adam Goryachev ha scritto: >> > I can't comment on the DRBD related portions, but can't you add both > interfaces on each machine to a single bridge, and then configure the IP > address on the bridge. Hence each machine will only have one IP address, > and the other machines

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 13/01/2017 19:58, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: > root@mpve1:~# drbdsetup status > .drbdctrl role:Secondary > volume:0 disk:UpToDate > volume:1 disk:UpToDate > mpve2 role:Secondary > volume:0 peer-disk:UpToDate > volume:1 peer-disk:UpToDate > mpve3 role:Primary > volume:0

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 02/01/2017 14:53, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: > One advice from who use drbd9 on PVE in production, please: we have a > cluster of 3 PVe 4.3 servers with the last DRBD version available prom > PVE repository. > > I read on the list that there are several problems with new DRBD > version, I

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >> All is up and running nicely, in any case. > > I said that too early: I tried to restore a kvm virtual machine and it > fails, systematically. > > I attached here the comm

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 29/12/2016 15:01, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >> Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >>> All is up and running nicely, in any case. > Another issue: drbdmanaged starts at boot, but most resources remain dow

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >> All is up and running nicely, in any case. > I said that too early: I tried to restore a kvm virtual machine and it > fails, systematically. > > I attached here the command

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 28/12/2016 16:00, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >> All is up and running nicely, in any case. Another issue: drbdmanaged starts at boot, but most resources remain down; a drbdmanaged restart fixes that. I attach a related fragment fr

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 04/01/2017 12:42, Igor Cicimov ha scritto: > For the "has to remove [...] completely": Puh, dangerous territory to > comment on, but that was the decision of Proxmox. > > > No serious company would integrate drbd in their product and then tell > their customers to talk to Linbit in

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 04/01/2017 13:51, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > If you are a > company and you provide commercial support/commercial trainings and make > money out of that support business, then I think it is fair to give back > a bit to the people that wrote the stuff you are making money with. I agree, here

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 10/01/2017 11:04, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: > Yes, I confirm that yesterday too, on a 3 server PVE4.3 with DRBD9 > deployed from Proxmox repository, I make a backup and a restore of a KVM > virtual machine; moreover I migrate the VM on the 3 PVE without problem. > > This is the reason of

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 09/01/2017 19:20, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: > This means that in PVE cluster of 3 servers with DRBD9 updated isn't > possible to restore KVM virtual machines? > Other people on list with the same problem or is only in your > configuration? > Just to know before update ;-) This means that in

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 10/01/2017 10:14, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 09/01/2017 19:20, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: >> This means that in PVE cluster of 3 servers with DRBD9 updated isn't >> possible to restore KVM virtual machines? >> Other people on list with the same problem or is only in

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 09/01/2017 19:20, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: > This means that in PVE cluster of 3 servers with DRBD9 updated isn't > possible to restore KVM virtual machines? > Other people on list with the same problem or is only in your > configuration? > Just to know before update ;-) I have just

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD Manage and Proxmox storage driver repository

Il 12/12/2016 11:51, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > $ apt-get update W: Conflicting distribution: http://packages.linbit.com proxmox-43 Release (expected proxmox-43 but got proxmox-4) Bye, rob ___ drbd-user mailing list drbd-user@lists.linbit.com

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 23/12/2016 09:48, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: ... >>> ...There I would need more information. The version >>> we ship and the one from proxmox are very different. In between these >>> versions the architecture of DM was changed. Just as an example: If you >>> have two nodes in your cluster

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > All is up and running nicely, in any case. I said that too early: I tried to restore a kvm virtual machine and it fails, systematically. I attached here the command with relative output, and the fragment of syslog related to restore. It se

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 23/12/2016 12:22, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >> So, this is essentially a stop-the-world and then upgrade scenario. > I agree. Will try directly that. I have successfully done the transition to linbit repo drbdmanage. I stopped all vms (but one), upgraded to new components as in the

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 27/12/2016 11:26, Jean-Daniel Tissot ha scritto: > On 27/12/2016 10:19, Roberto Resoli wrote : >> I have successfully done the transition to linbit repo drbdmanage. > Hi, > Well, I have done a three nodes PVE cluster. I can't use CEPH or others > storage technologies. >

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD Manage and Proxmox storage driver repository

Il 21/12/2016 12:40, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:15:58PM +0100, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> Il 12/12/2016 11:51, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: >>> $ apt-get update >> >> W: Conflicting distribution: http://packages.linbit.com proxmox-43 &

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD Manage and Proxmox storage driver repository

Il 22/12/2016 11:17, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:53:24AM +0100, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> Il 21/12/2016 12:40, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: >>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:15:58PM +0100, Roberto Resoli wrote: >>>> Il 12/12/2016 11:

[DRBD-user] Testing new pve dedicated repo for PVE

Hello, I start a new thread, as suggested in [1]; I would like to test the new linbit repositorry for Proxmox Virtual Environment [2], and I need some preliminary information before starting. I refer to these statments from [1]: > For the second thing: There I would need more information. The

[DRBD-user] DRBD 9 on pve: pending actions after container creation

Hello, I have successfully created a new container on a 3 node pve cluster on drbd9 lvm-thin based shared storage. On tho nodes the resource (vm-122-disk-1) is in good shape, and is correctly created and synced on the third as well. Anyway, drbdmanage a reports pending actions on it:

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD 9 on pve: pending actions after container creation

Il 24/03/2017 12:36, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > pve3 | vm-122-disk-1 | * | | discard data, pending actions: > commission | > | pve3 | vm-122-disk-1 | 0 | | pending actions: commission, > attach | > > I tried to unassign resource on pve3, which is ok

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9 with PVE4.4, failure to restore VMs

Il 25/03/2017 12:38, Den ha scritto: > Hi Roberto and all :-) > > >> Do you mean LVL or LVM-thin ? Argh.. I meant LVM or LVM-thin ? > > This is my storage-plugin: drbdmanage.storage.lvm.Lvm > I changed it from the default before creating drbdmanage cluster Ok >>> So when I create a VM on

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9 with PVE4.4, failure to restore VMs

Il 25/03/2017 11:02, Den ha scritto: > Hi, Hi Den, > I'm testing a 3 node cluster, fresh installed with linbit repo for pve > with last versions Me too (even if mine is not fresh installed ;-) ) > I have configured LVM as backend storage and set redundancy to 1 for now. Do you mean LVL or

[DRBD-user] Uncorrect threading on mailman Archive for this list

Hello, This is just a note for the mailing list maintainer; it appears that that's something wrong in threading on this ml archive. I noted that my message: http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2017-March/023117.html Is incorrectly classified as a reply to :

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD 9 on pve: pending actions after container creation

Il 26/03/2017 11:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > I tried to create a new resource bypassing pve storage plugin, using > drbmanage: > > drbdmanage add-volume prova 200MB --deploy 3 > > I get a clean "drbdmanage a" status on the same node, and "pending > a

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD 9 on pve: failure creating new container

Il 21/03/2017 11:26, Yannis Milios ha scritto: > In my case I get 'Cannot notify leader' when creating a container on a > target which is not in Primary (drbdctrl control node) mode. > So, whenever I need to create a container, I first switch to shell and I > run drbd-overview, make a note of

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD 9 on pve: failure creating new container

Il 22 marzo 2017 19:28:20 CET, Yannis Milios ha scritto: >You have to investigate what's wrong on pve3 at the lower layers. What >type >of storage plugin are you using as backing device for DRBD? LVM ? I'm >using >ZFS and so far I'm very happy with it (Thin LVM didn't

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD 9 on pve: pending actions after container creation

Il 11/04/2017 16:41, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: > Thanks Yannis, > unfortunatly drbdmanage resume-all nor drbdmanage restart get no effect. > I'm afraid I'll have to delete and recreate resources... Why? Have you ane issue with your resources, apoart of "pending actions" ? rob

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD 9 on pve: pending actions after container creation

Il 11/04/2017 16:59, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 11/04/2017 16:41, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: >> Thanks Yannis, >> unfortunatly drbdmanage resume-all nor drbdmanage restart get no effect. >> I'm afraid I'll have to delete and recreate resources... > Why? Have

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD 9 on pve: pending actions after container creation

Il 12/04/2017 09:24, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: > So I don't understand the showed by , > maybe a false indication of drbdmanage? I think so; i suspect some misalignement between control volume status and real status of drbd resources. May be someone of drbd folks may give some more info.

Re: [DRBD-user] How to install drbd 9.0.7 under pve4

Il 20/04/2017 11:10, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > it misses a dependency from drbd-utils (>= 8.9.11) . Only drbd-utils > 8.9.10 is available atm. > > Is this intended? I guess it was not intended, today the missing package suddenly appeared :-) I installed drbd-dkms after in

[DRBD-user] How to install drbd 9.0.7 under pve4

Hello, I see that drbd 9.0.7 is in pve-4 linbit repo, but if i try to install it, it misses a dependency from drbd-utils (>= 8.9.11) . Only drbd-utils 8.9.10 is available atm. Is this intended? thanks, rob ___ drbd-user mailing list

Re: [DRBD-user] How to install drbd 9.0.7 under pve4

Il 20/04/2017 11:07, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Hello, > > I see that drbd 9.0.7 is in pve-4 linbit repo, but if i try to install > it, sorry, i omitted to specify that it is available via dkms: # LANG=en_EN apt-get install drbd-dkms Reading package lists... Done Building dep

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9 and Proxmox - no quorum in 2 nodes cluster

Il 14/03/2017 10:47, Shafeek Sumser ha scritto: > Hi Yannis, > > Thanks for the information you provided. > > On pve1, I have initiate the cluster and add the node pve2. When the > drbdctrl is primary on pve1 (secondary on pve2) and I shutdown the pve2, > the drbd storage is available. I can

Re: [DRBD-user] Proxmox VE 4.x DRBD 9 plugin - how is it supposed to work?

Il 01 marzo 2017 23:13:38 CET, "Sean M. Pappalardo" ha scritto: > > >On 03/01/2017 12:41 AM, Roland Kammerer wrote: >>> On 02/28/2017 12:44 AM, Roland Kammerer wrote: Yes it uses dual-primary, only during the migration. From what we >saw it works

Re: [DRBD-user] Testing new DRBD9 dedicated repo for PVE

Il 17/02/2017 14:16, Lars Ellenberg ha scritto: > Thanks, I've updated to 0.99.2 now in repo; much better, most resources > are up at startup. > > drbdmanage restart keeps failing (sometimes shutdown, wait, startup > succeeds) : Just upgraded to python-drbdmanage 0.99.3-1 from pve repo.

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD 9 on pve: failure creating new container

Il 21/03/2017 15:39, Michele Rossetti ha scritto: > The same problem I had some days ago creating a KVM on a node not > primary, the creation failed but, after some attempts I found with > "drbdmanage a" 6 disk created and I had to remove them with "drbdmanage > remove-resource -f" > > It seems a

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd-9.0.8

Il 16/07/2017 18:55, Yannis Milios ha scritto: >>> so drbd does not works after reboot (the old drbd_transport_tcp loading > fails, >> of course) > > I had the same problem but I managed to overcome it by issuing the > following commands (after the upgrade to 9.0.8): > >> dkms remove -m drbd -v

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd-9.0.8

Su sabato 8 luglio 2017 15:08:51 CEST, Yannis Milios ha scritto: Thanks for bringing the latest version in PVE repo! Thanks from my side too. I am testing it; upgrade procedure of drbd-dkms still fails to rebuild drbd_transport_tcp module , as reported in

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd.service file in root-directory

Il 20/07/2017 12:19, Dominic Pratt ha scritto: > Hi there, > > we‘ve stumbled upon the file drbd.service in our root-directory (/), > which propably doesn’t belong there. Same here. rob ___ drbd-user mailing list drbd-user@lists.linbit.com

Re: [DRBD-user] Show Current Resync Rate

Il 26/07/2017 09:06, Vladimír Bartoš ha scritto: > you can get actual resync speed from > > /sys/kernel/debug/drbd/resources/${resource_name}/connections/${hostname}/0/proc_drbd This is very interesting, thanks! rob > -- > Vlado Bartos > bar...@jadro.org

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd-9.0.8

Il 19/06/2017 18:32, Philipp Reisner ha scritto: > Hi, > > finally it is there! With two rc's and surprising bug reports coming in late, > the release process has been a bit more challenging than usual. Maybe > the fact that I am doing this release while being in Beijing for the first > LinuxCon

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9, ZFS storage plugin and PVE snapshot/clones integration

Il 06/03/2017 11:23, Yannis Milios ha scritto: > Hello, > > First, excuse me if this question is not related to DRBD devs, but I > wasn't sure where else I should ask for. > I'm testing DRBD9 ZFS storage plugin on a 3 node PVE cluster. > So far everything work flawlessly and I believe that DRBD9

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9, ZFS storage plugin and PVE snapshot/clones integration

Il 23/08/2017 10:26, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:14:39AM +0200, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> Il 06/03/2017 11:23, Yannis Milios ha scritto: >>> Hello, >>> >>> First, excuse me if this question is not related to DRBD devs, but I >

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd-9.0.8

Il 28/06/2017 08:53, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: >> Great! Will you update "drbd-dkms" package in proxmox-4 repo as well >> anytime soon? > Sure, this will happen. Eventually. Thank you , I will have a chance to test it and report. Eventually ;-) rob

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd cluster initialize

Il 15 settembre 2017 18:56:02 CEST, Tsirkas Georgios ha scritto: >Thank you very much for your answer. >Another question is about Proxmox 5 and drbd9 module. >I load drbd9 module with drbd-dkms package. But seems that it doesnt >work. What are the symptoms ? I have

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd cluster initialize

Il 18/09/2017 12:35, Tsirkas Georgios ha scritto: > What kernel use? > What kernel-headers ? > Which repository? Stock pve5 repo for proxmox stuff, linbit pve4 for drbd stuff, including the perl storage pve middleware for drbd9. rob ___ drbd-user

Re: [DRBD-user] drbdmanage-proxmox v2.0

Il 21/09/2017 20:28, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 19/09/2017 17:21, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: >> Dear proxmox users & testers, >> >> we have published version 2.0 of drbdmanage-proxmox, and we created a >> publicly available, dedicated proxmox-5 repo[1]

Re: [DRBD-user] drbdmanage-proxmox v2.0

Il 19/09/2017 17:21, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > Dear proxmox users & testers, > > we have published version 2.0 of drbdmanage-proxmox, and we created a > publicly available, dedicated proxmox-5 repo[1]. Very welcome new, really! > As usual, we also provide tar-balls[2], and a git repo[3]. >

Re: [DRBD-user] Cancelling pending actions

Il 05/10/2017 10:19, Martyn Spencer ha scritto: > Thanks for the tip, Rob. You're welcome, but I think we all have to thank Vlado Bartos, for this: https://lists.gt.net/drbd/users/29049#29049 bye, rob ___ drbd-user mailing list

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd9: drbdmanage.storage.lvm_thinlv.LvmThinLv plugin - free space calculation still wrong (drbdmanage update-pool)

Il 09/10/2017 16:48, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 09/10/2017 15:35, Robert Altnoeder ha scritto: >> On 10/09/2017 11:04 AM, Roberto Resoli wrote: >>> I currently remove snap_percent from used space in "update_pool" >>> function inside >>> >>&

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd9: drbdmanage.storage.lvm_thinlv.LvmThinLv plugin - free space calculation still wrong (drbdmanage update-pool)

Il 09/10/2017 15:35, Robert Altnoeder ha scritto: > On 10/09/2017 11:04 AM, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> I currently remove snap_percent from used space in "update_pool" >> function inside >> >> /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/drbdmanage/storage/lvm_thinlv.py &g

Re: [DRBD-user] drbdmanage-proxmox v2.0

Il 19/09/2017 17:21, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > Dear proxmox users & testers, > > we have published version 2.0 of drbdmanage-proxmox, and we created a > publicly available, dedicated proxmox-5 repo[1]. > > As usual, we also provide tar-balls[2], and a git repo[3]. ... > I would also like

[DRBD-user] drbdmanage-proxmox reports wrong total size for drbd storage

In proxmox GUI drbd9 storage plugin reports as total size the aggregate cluster size: In file "/usr/share/perl5/PVE/Storage/Custom/DRBDPlugin.pm" at line 215 the command drbdmanage list-free-space $redundancy -m is used to get $total_space and $free_space, but the first number returned is the

Re: [DRBD-user] drbdmanage-proxmox reports wrong total size for drbd storage

Il 17/10/2017 16:25, Robert Altnoeder ha scritto: > On 2017/10/17 3:19 PM, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> but the second [editor's note] number returned is the >> "Aggregate cluster storage", as stated by the output >> of the same command without the "machine-rea

Re: [DRBD-user] drbdmanage-proxmox reports wrong total size for drbd storage

Il 17/10/2017 15:19, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > drbdmanage list-free-space $redundancy -m > > is used to get $total_space and $free_space, > > but the first number returned is the "Aggregate cluster storage", Sorry, it is the second number; for instance: # d

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd9: drbdmanage.storage.lvm_thinlv.LvmThinLv plugin - free space calculation still wrong (drbdmanage update-pool)

Il 11/10/2017 14:57, Alexander Barton ha scritto: > Hi! > > Am 09.10.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Robert Altnoeder > <robert.altnoe...@linbit.com>: > >> On 10/09/2017 11:04 AM, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> >>> I currently remove snap_percent from used space in &quo

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd 9.0.9 - drbd-utils 9.1.0 : "drbdadm adjust" segfaults

Il 07/09/2017 21:13, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > I have just updated to drbd 9.0.9 - drbd-utils 9.1.0 from the proxmox4 repo. ... > Symptoms: > > Issuing a "drbdadm adjust" command results in a segfault: > > For instance: > > # drbdadm down vm-105-disk-

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd 9.0.9 - drbd-utils 9.1.0 : "drbdadm adjust" segfaults

Il 08/09/2017 11:10, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Regarding resource files, I retried this morning to reboot a node; > drbdmanaged takes very long to settle down (drbdmanage commands going > timout); in the meanwhile, very few .res are generated, so I have to > wait for issuing drb

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd 9.0.9 - drbd-utils 9.1.0 : "drbdadm adjust" segfaults

Il 08/09/2017 10:45, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:17:18AM +0200, Roberto Resoli wrote: ... > It would be great if you could post the *.res file. You can find it attached here; i included also in the tgz the global_common file; i suspect that some resync configu

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd 9.0.9 - drbd-utils 9.1.0 : "drbdadm adjust" segfaults

Il 08/09/2017 17:10, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> Il 08/09/2017 10:45, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: >>> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:17:18AM +0200, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> ... >>> It would be great

[DRBD-user] DRBD9 - No free space on pool

Hello, I am facing unability to create new volumes or enlarge old ones on a three node DRBD9 cluster. DRBD9 packages are latest from proxmox-4 linbit repo. DRBD9 storage uses ThinLV volumes as backend, and replicaton size is three for all volumes. # drbdmanage list-free-space -m 3 0,5032497152

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9 - No free space on pool

Il 30/08/2017 18:28, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Hello, > > I am facing unability to create new volumes or enlarge old ones on a > three node DRBD9 cluster. > > DRBD9 packages are latest from proxmox-4 linbit repo. In detail: drbd-dkms 9.0.8+linbit-1 drbd-utils 9.0.0+l

[DRBD-user] drbd 9.0.9 - drbd-utils 9.1.0 : "drbdadm adjust" segfaults

I have just updated to drbd 9.0.9 - drbd-utils 9.1.0 from the proxmox4 repo. Context: # uname -r 4.10.17-2-pve # cat /proc/drbd version: 9.0.9-1 (api:2/proto:86-112) GIT-hash: f7b979e7af01813e031aac579140237640c94569 build by root@pve2, 2017-09-07 13:02:48 Transports (api:16): tcp (9.0.9-1) #

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9 - No free space on pool

Su venerdì 1 settembre 2017 21:44:55 CEST, Roberto Resoli <robe...@resolutions.it> ha scritto: Su venerdì 1 settembre 2017 11:13:02 CEST, Roberto Resoli <robe...@resolutions.it> ha scritto: Il 01/09/2017 09:30, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: ... hm, the environment for these com

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9 - No free space on pool

Su venerdì 1 settembre 2017 11:13:02 CEST, Roberto Resoli <robe...@resolutions.it> ha scritto: Il 01/09/2017 09:30, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: ... hm, the environment for these commands should be LC_ALL="C", LANG="C", Right, I should have guessed that.

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9 - No free space on pool

Il 31/08/2017 08:13, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 30/08/2017 18:39, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >> Il 30/08/2017 18:28, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am facing unability to create new volumes or enlarge old ones on a >>> thr

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9 - No free space on pool

Il 01/09/2017 09:30, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > you got that one reverse, but anyways. yes, sorry >> and rerun >> >> drbdmanage update-pool >> >> on each node. >> >> Now free space is correct: > hm, the environment for these commands should be LC_ALL="C", LANG="C", Right, I should have

Re: [DRBD-user] pve-headers from stable repository

Il 29/08/2017 10:01, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 05:10:20PM +0300, Tsirkas Georgios wrote: >> Hello, >> I have installed proxmox5 and want to install drbd9. For installation , i >> think that needs dkms with pve-headers . >> Which is the stable repository for pve-headers?

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD9 - No free space on pool

Il 30/08/2017 18:39, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 30/08/2017 18:28, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >> Hello, >> >> I am facing unability to create new volumes or enlarge old ones on a >> three node DRBD9 cluster. >> >> DRBD9 packages are latest from proxmo

Re: [DRBD-user] Cancelling pending actions

Il 05/10/2017 18:06, Robert Altnoeder ha scritto: > On 10/05/2017 08:49 AM, Roberto Resoli wrote: ... >> cat >> /sys/kernel/debug/drbd/resources/${resource_name}/connections/${node_name}/0/proc_drbd >> > > However, the contents and format of anything under /sys/kernel/d

Re: [DRBD-user] Cancelling pending actions

Il 11/10/2017 21:22, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: >> drbdmon is included in recent drbd-utils versions. > Unfortunately is not in current (9.1.1) drbd-utils package in pve5 repo. Sorry, I meant that *drbdtop* is not in current drbd-utils package.

[DRBD-user] drbd9: drbdmanage.storage.lvm_thinlv.LvmThinLv plugin - free space calculation still wrong (drbdmanage update-pool)

I am close following recent developments of drbd9; I am using the drbdmanage.storage.lvm_thinlv.LvmThinLv plugin on a pve5 three node cluster installation (drbdmanaged is from recent pve5 repo: drbdmanage 0.99.12 ). As I reported in detail some time ago on this list[1], i think that free space

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd-9.0.10rc1 & drbd-utils-9.2.0rc1

Il 14/12/2017 12:51, Roberto Resoli ha scritto: > Il 14/12/2017 12:41, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: >>> config.status: error: cannot find input file: `user/shared/config.h.in' >> That one is generated by autoheader, and what you want to run is >> ./autogen.sh > Thanks, bu

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd-9.0.10rc1 & drbd-utils-9.2.0rc1

Il 14 dicembre 2017 15:33:36 CET, Roland Kammerer <roland.kamme...@linbit.com> ha scritto: >On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 03:03:22PM +0100, Roberto Resoli wrote: ... >> I will try to resume in the proposed patch to README.md my findings, >> while waiting for rc2. > >As I a

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd-9.0.10rc1 & drbd-utils-9.2.0rc1

Il 05/12/2017 14:29, Philipp Reisner ha scritto: > Please help testing the release candidate. I would like to help testing; could someone point me to building instructions? I found a section[1] 4.3 in the User Guide for drbd8, but none for drbd9 . bye, rob [1]

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd-9.0.10rc1 & drbd-utils-9.2.0rc1

Il 14/12/2017 12:00, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:54:40AM +0100, Roberto Resoli wrote: >> Il 05/12/2017 14:29, Philipp Reisner ha scritto: >>> Please help testing the release candidate. >> >> I would like to help testing; coul

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd-9.0.10rc1 & drbd-utils-9.2.0rc1

Il 14/12/2017 12:41, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: >> config.status: error: cannot find input file: `user/shared/config.h.in' > That one is generated by autoheader, and what you want to run is > ./autogen.sh Thanks, building now ... some hint in README.md file would'nt hurt; will try to propose an

Re: [DRBD-user] proxmox kernel 4.13.8-2 breaks drbd9

Il 04/12/2017 09:52, Roland Kammerer ha scritto: >> At reboot, .drbdctrl resource is not coming up cleanly, and reults out >> of sync on both secondary nodes. > Did you/actually dkms recompile the kernel module? The new module for that kernel was in place, after reboot i checked if drbd modules

Re: [DRBD-user] Strange drbdtop results

Il 11/05/2018 19:02, Yannis Milios ha scritto: >>drbdtop on a resource with detailed >status give me OutOfSync on some >>nodes. > > I try to adjust all resources without any success on solving this problem > > > That can be solved by “disconnect/connect” the resource that has out of > sync

Re: [DRBD-user] Strange drbdtop results

Il 11/05/2018 16:13, Jean-Daniel TISSOT ha scritto: > │  .drbdctrl | Secondary | ✓ | ✗ (1)  | ✓   | ✗ (1)    This is really weird; .drbdctrl resource have to be in perfect shape on all nodes before attempting anything else ... rob

  1   2   >