was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150412/7f16d991/attachment.html>
for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150412/2639b6e5/attachment.html>
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Martin Peres wrote:
> On 05/02/2015 11:49, Christian König wrote:
>>
>> Am 04.02.2015 um 23:27 schrieb Alex Deucher:
>>>
>>> 0-255 seems to be the preferred range for the pwm interface.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
>>
>> Yeah, using 100 on a 8bit pwm
||.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150412/ae2a5133/attachment.html>
...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150412/68db5a2c/attachment-0001.html>
are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150412/3e8c26f7/attachment.html>
Hi Sevan,
Big thanks for going through this. It's always nice to hear back the
BSD folk :-)
On 11 April 2015 at 06:15, Sevan Janiyan wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm upstreaming a merge of two patches taken from the FreeBSD ports
> tree & NetBSD's pkgsrc tree so the credit/blame is not mine. :)
>
> The
